Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 61, Number 7, October-November 2004
Page(s) 695 - 704
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004060
References of Ann. For. Sci. 61 695-704
  1. Balneaves J.M., Biological advantages of using the direct on-bed packing system in a droughty climate, in: Menzies M.I. (Ed.), Proceedings of the IUFRO, conference "Efficiency of Stand Establishment", Rotorua, New Zealand, September 1989, IUFRO, Rotorua, 1990.
  2. Bernier P.Y., Comparing natural and planted black spruce seedlings. I. Water relations and growth, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 2427-2434.
  3. Binder W.D., Scagel R.K., Krumlik G.J., Root growth potential: Facts, myths, value?, in: Proceedings, Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Association, USDA Gen. Tech. Rep. RM 167, 1988, pp. 111-118.
  4. Brissette J.C., Chambers J.L., Leaf water status and root system water flux in shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) seedlings in relationship to new growth after transplanting, Tree Physiol. 11 (1992) 289-303 [PubMed].
  5. Burdett A.N., New methods for measuring root growth capacity: Their value in assessing lodgepine stock quality, Can. J. For. Res. 9 (1979) 63-67.
  6. Burdett A.N., Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock, Can. J. For. Res. 20 (1990) 415-427.
  7. Canell M.G.R., Tabbush P.M., Deans J.D., Hollingsworth M.K., Sheppard L.J., Philipson J.J., Murray M.B., Sitka spruce and Douglas-fir seedlings in the nursery and in cold storage: Root growth potential, carbohydrate content, dormancy, frost hardiness and mitotic index, Forestry 63 (1990) 9-27.
  8. Carlson W.C., Root system consideration in the quality of loblolly pine seedlings, South J. Appl. For. 10 (1986) 87-92.
  9. Coutts M.P., Leaf water potential and control of water loss in droughted Sitka spruce seedlings, J. Exp. Bot. 32 (1981) 1193-1201.
  10. Fernández M., Gil L., Pardos J.A., Response of Pinus pinaster Ait. Provenances at early age to water suply. I. Water relation parameters, Ann. For. Sci. 56 (1999) 179-187.
  11. Folk R.S., Grossnickle S.C., Determining field performance potential with the use of limiting environmental conditions, New For. 13 (1997) 121-138.
  12. Garriou D., Girard S., Guehl J.M., Généré B., Effect of desiccation during cold storage on planting stock quality and field performance in forest species, Ann. For. Sci. 57 (2000) 101-111 [EDP Sciences].
  13. Girard S., Clement A., Cochard H., Boulet-Gercout B., Guehl J.M., Effects of desiccation on post-planting stress in bare-root Corsican pine seedlings, Tree Physiol. 17 (1997) 429-435 [PubMed].
  14. Grossnickle S.C., Ecophysiology of Northern spruce species. The performance of planted seedlings, NRC-CNRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada, 2000.
  15. Grossnickle S.C., Blake T.J., Acclimation of cold-stored jack pine and white spruce seedlings: Effect of soil temperature on water relation patterns, Can. J. For. Res. 15 (1985) 544-550.
  16. Guehl J.M., Clement A., Kaushal P., Aussenac G., Planting stress, water status and non-structural carbohydrate concentration in Corsican pine seedlings, Tree Physiol. 12 (1993) 173-183 [PubMed].
  17. Jiang Y., McDonald E., Zwiazek J.J., Effects of cold storage and water stress on water relations and gas exchange of white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings, Tree Physiol. 15 (1995) 267-273 [PubMed].
  18. Kaufmann M.R., Stomatal control and the development of water deficit in Engelman spruce seedlings during drought, Can. J. For. Res. 9 (1979) 297-304.
  19. Kaushall P., Aussenac G., Transplanting shock in Corsican pine and cedar of Atlas seedlings: Internal water deficits, growth and root regeneration, For. Ecol. Manage. 27 (1989) 29-40.
  20. Kozlowski T.T., Water supply and tree growth. I. Water deficits, For. Abstr. 43 (1982) 57-95.
  21. Livingston N.J., Black T.A., Water stress and survival of three species of conifer seedlings planted on a high elevation south-facing clear-cut, Can. J. For. Res. 17 (1987) 1115-1123.
  22. McCracken I.J., Packaging and cool storage of tree seedlings, N.Z. J. For. Sci. 24 (1979) 278-287.
  23. McCreary D.D., Duryea M.L., OSU vigor test, in: Duryea M.L. (Ed.), Principles, procedures and predictive ability, Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, procedures and predictive ability of major tests, Workshop: For. Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ, Corvailis, Oregon, 1985, pp. 85-92.
  24. McKay H.M., Electrolyte leakage from fine roots of conifer seedlings: A rapid index of plant vitality following cold storage, Can. J. For. Res. 22 (1992) 1371-1377.
  25. McKay H.M., A review of the effect of stresses between lifting and planting on nursery stock quality and performance, New For. 13 (1997) 369-399.
  26. McKay H.M., White I.M.S., Fine root electrolyte leakage and moisture content: Indices of Sitka spruce and Douglas-fir seedling performance after desiccation, New For. 13 (1997) 139-162.
  27. Mena-Petite A., Duñabeitia M.K., González-Moro B., Muñoz-Rueda A., Lacuesta M., Sequential effects of acidic precipitation and drought on water relations of Pinus radiata seedlings, J. Plant Physiol. 155 (1999) 93-100.
  28. Mena-Petite A., González-Moro B., González-Murua C., Lacuesta M., Muñoz-Rueda A., Sequential effects of acidic precipitation and drought on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Pinus radiata D. Don seedlings, J. Plant Physiol. 156 (2000) 84-92.
  29. Mena-Petite A., Ortega-Lasuen U., González-Moro B., Lacuesta M., Muñoz-Rueda A., Storage duration and temperature effect on the functional integrity of container and bare-root Pinus radiata D. Don stock types, Trees 15 (2001) 289-296 [CrossRef].
  30. Mena-Petite A., Robredo A., Alcalde S., Duñabeitia M.K., González-Moro B., Lacuesta M., Muñoz-Rueda A., Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of Pinus radiata D. Don seedlings during and after several storage regimes and their effects on post-planting survival, Trees 17 (2003) 133-143.
  31. Nambiar E.K.S., Bowen G.D., Sands R., Root regeneration and plant water status of Pinus radiata D. Don seedlings transplanted to different soil temperatures, J. Exp. Bot. 30 (1979) 1119-1131.
  32. Nguyen A., Lamant A., Variation in growth and osmotic regulation of roots of water-stressed maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) provenances, Tree Physiol. 5 (1989) 123-133 [PubMed].
  33. Nguyen-Queyrens A., Costa P., Loustau D., Plomion C., Osmotic adjustment in Pinus pinaster cuttings in response to a soil drying cycle, Ann. For. Sci. 59 (2002) 795-799 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  34. Omi S.K., Yoder B., Rose R., Fall lifting and long-term freezer storage of ponderosa pine seedlings: Effects on post-storage leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, and root growth potential, Tree Physiol. 8 (1991) 315-325 [PubMed].
  35. Picon-Cochard C., Guehl J.M., Leaf gas exchange and carbohydrate concentrations in Pinus pinaster plants subjected ot elevated CO2 and a soil drying cycle, Ann. For. Sci. 56 (1999) 71-76.
  36. Sands R., Transplanting stress in radiata pine, Aust. For. Res. 14 (1984) 67-72.
  37. Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D., Hemmingsen E.A., Sap pressure in vascular plants, Science 148 (1965) 339-346.
  38. Simpson D.G., Vyse A., Thomson C.F., Roots growth effects on field performance, in: Proceedings, Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations, USDA For. Ser. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167, 1988, pp. 111-118.
  39. Sucoff E., Buschena C., Tamte P., Desiccation and water potentials in the roots, leaves, and shoots of bare-root red pine and white spruce, Can. J. For. Res. 15 (1985) 989-992.
  40. Symeonidou M.V., Buckley P.G., The effect of pre-planting desiccation on survival and growth of Prunus cerasifera seedlings and the relationship of physiological indicators at planting with field performance and survival, Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 44 (1997) 514-517.
  41. Tanaka Y., Brotherton P., Hosteter S., Chapman D., Dyce S., Balanger J., Johnson B., Duke S., The operational stock quality testing program at Weyerhaeuser, New For. 13 (1997) 423-437.