Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 61, Number 7, October-November 2004
Page(s) 677 - 682
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004066
References of Ann. For. Sci. 61 677-682
  1. Baskerville G.L., Use of logarithmic regression in the estimate of plant biomass, Can. J. For. Res. 2 (1972) 49-53.
  2. Bolin B., Sukumar R., Global perspective, in: Watson R.T., Noble I.R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N.H., Verardo D.J., Dokken D.J. (Eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, Special Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 25-46.
  3. Brown S., Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges, Environ. Pollut. 116 (2002) 363-372 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  4. Coomes D.A., Allen R.B., Scott N.A., Goulding C., Beets P., Designing systems to monitor carbon stocks in forests and shrublands, For. Ecol. Manage. 164 (2002) 89-108.
  5. Crow T.R., Laidly P.R., Alternative models for estimating woody plant biomass, Can. J. For. Res. 10 (1980) 367-370.
  6. Crow T.R., Schlaegel B.E., A guide to using regression equations for estimating tree biomass, North. J. Appl. For. 5 (1988) 15-22.
  7. Dagnelie P., Palm R., Rondeux J., Thill A., Tables de cubage des arbres et des peuplements forestiers, Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux, 1985.
  8. Duvigneaud P., La synthèse écologique, Doin éditeurs, Paris, 1984.
  9. Forest and Green Areas Division (FGAD), The Forest Inventory of the Flemish Region. Results of the first inventory 1997-1999, Ministry of the Flemish Community, 2001 (in Dutch).
  10. Goodale C.L., Apps M.J., Birdsey R.A., Field C.B., Heath L.S., Houghton R.A., Jenkins J.C., Kohlmaier G.H., Kurz W., Liu S., Nabuurs G.J., Nilsson S., Shvidenko A.Z., Forest carbon sinks in the Northern hemisphere, Ecol. Appl. 12 (2002) 891-899.
  11. Heath L.S., Smith J.E., An assessment of uncertainty in forest carbon budget projections, Environ. Sci. Policy 3 (2000) 73-82.
  12. Houghton J.T., Ding Y., Griggs D.J., Noguer M., van der Linden P.J., Dai X., Maskell K., Johnson C.A., Climate Change 2001. The Scientific Basis, Contribution of working group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University press, Cambridge, 2001.
  13. Houghton R.A., Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different? Glob. Change Biol. 9 (2003) 500-509.
  14. Huxley J.S., Problems of relative growth, Methuen & Co, London, 1932.
  15. Ketterings Q.M., Coe R., van Noordwijk M., Ambagau Y., Palm CA., Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 146 (2001) 199-209.
  16. Kohl M., Paivinen R., Study on European Forestry Information and Communication system, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, in: Watson et al. (Eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, Special Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University press, Cambridge, 1997.
  17. Löwe H., Seufert G., Raes F., Comparison of methods used within Member States for estimating CO2 emissions and sinks according to UNFCCC and EU Monitoring Mechanism: forest and other wooded land, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 4 (2000) 315-319.
  18. Montgomery D.C., Peck E.A., Introduction to linear regression analysis, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1992.
  19. Neirynck J., Maddelein D., de Keersmaeker L., Lust N., Muys B., Biomass and nutrient cycling of a highly productive Corsican pine stand on former heathland in northern Belgium, Ann. Sci. For. 55 (1998) 389-405.
  20. Ney R.A., Schnoor J.L., Mancuso M.A., A methodology to estimate carbon storage and flux in forestland using existing forest and soils databases, Environ. Monit. Assess. 78 (2002) 291-307 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  21. Pontailler J.Y., Ceulemans R., Guittet J., Biomass yield of poplar after five 2-year coppice rotations, Forestry 72 (1999) 157-163.
  22. Rondeux J., La Mesure des arbres et des peuplements forestiers, Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux, 1993.
  23. Samson R., Nachtergale L., Schauvliege M., Lemeur R., Lust N., Experimental set-up for biogeochemical research in the mixed deciduous forest Aelmoeseneie (East-Flanders), Silva Gandavensis 61 (1996) 1-14.
  24. Satoo T., Madgwick H.A.I., Forest Biomass, Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk, London, 1982.
  25. Schmitt M.D.C., Grigal D.F., Generalised biomass equations for Betula papyrifera Marsh., Can. J. For. Res. 11 (1981) 837-840.
  26. Tahvanainen L., Allometric relations to estimate aboveground dry-mass and height in Salix, Scand. J. For. Res. 11 (1996) 233-241.
  27. Telenius B.F., Non-destructive biomass estimation in Salix. Standardisation and automation of large-scale measurements in short rotation forestry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 1997.
  28. Vande Walle I., Mussche S., Samson R., Lust N., Lemeur R., The above- and belowground carbon pools of two mixed deciduous forest stands located in East-Flanders (Belgium), Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 507-517 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  29. Verwijst T., Telenius B., Biomass estimation procedures in short rotation forestry, For. Ecol. Manage. 121 (1999) 137-146.
  30. Watson R.T., Noble I.R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N.H., Verardo D.J., Dokken D.J., Land use, Land-use change, and forestry, A Special Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  31. Zianis D., Mencuccini M., Aboveground biomass relationships for beech (Fagus moesiaca Cz.) trees in Vermio Mountain, Northern Greece and generalised equations for Fagus sp., Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 439-448 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].