Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 62, Number 5, July-August 2005
Page(s) 429 - 440
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005039
References of Ann. For. Sci. 62 429-440
  1. Anonymous, Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests, 4th ed., Programme C Coordinating Centre Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products (BFH), Hamburg, 1998.
  2. Arpin P., Ponge J.-F., Faille A., Blandin P., Diversity and dynamics of eco-units in the biological reserves of the Fontainebleau Forest (France): Contribution of soil biology to a functional approach, Eur. J. Soil Biol. 34 (1998) 167-177 [CrossRef].
  3. Barden L.S., Forest development in canopy gaps of a diverse hardwood forest of the southern Appalachian Mountains, Oikos 37 (1981) 205-209.
  4. Bazzaz F.A., The physiological ecology of plant succession, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10 (1979) 351-371 [CrossRef].
  5. Bierzychudek P., Life histories and demography of shade-tolerant temperate forest herbs: a review, New Phytol. 90 (1982) 757-776.
  6. Boncina A., Comparison of structure and biodiversity in the Rajhenav virgin forest remanant and managed forest in the Dinaric region of Slovenia, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 9 (2000) 201-211.
  7. Bormann F.H., Likens G.E., Catastrophic disturbance and the steady state in Northern hardwood forests, Am. Sci. 67 (1979) 660-669.
  8. Braun-Blanquet J., Plant sociology, New York and London, 1932.
  9. Canham C.D., An index for understory light levels in and around canopy gaps, Ecology 69 (1988) 1634-1637.
  10. Canham C.D., Denslow J.S., Platt W.J., Runkle J.R., Spies T.A., White P.S., Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests, Can. J. For. Res. 20 (1990) 620-631.
  11. Canham C.D., Marks P.L., The response of woody plants to disturbance: patterns of establishment and growth, in: Pickett S.T.A., White P.S. (Eds.), The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 1985, pp. 197-216.
  12. Collins B.S., Pickett S.T.A., Demographic responses of herb layer species to experimental canopy gaps in Northern Hardwoods Forests, J. Ecol. 76 (1988) 437-450.
  13. Collins B.S., Pickett S.T.A., Response of herb layer to experimental canopy gaps, Am. Midl. Nat. 119 (1988) 282-290.
  14. Curt T., Prévosto B., KLesczewski M., Lepart J., Post-grazing Scots pine colonization of mid-elevation heathlands: population structure, impact on vegetation composition and diversity. Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 711-774.
  15. Diaz S., Cabido M., Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes, Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 (2001) 646-655 [CrossRef].
  16. Diekmann M., Dupré C., Acidification and eutrophication of deciduous forests in northwestern Germany demonstrated by indicator species analysis, J. Veg. Sci. 8 (1997) 855-864.
  17. Diekmann M., Falkengren-Gerup U., Prediction of species response to atmospheric nitrogen deposition by means of ecological measure and life history traits, J. Ecol. 90 (2002) 108-120 [CrossRef].
  18. Dufrêne M., Legendre P., Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach, Ecol. Monogr, 67 (1997) 345-366.
  19. Dzwonko Z., Relations between the floristic composition of isolated young woods and their proximity to ancient woodland, J. Veg. Sci. 4 (1993) 693-698.
  20. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W., Paulißen D., Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa, Scripta Geobotanica 18, Goltze, Göttingen, 1992.
  21. Emborg J., Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark, For. Ecol. Manage. 106 (1998) 83-95.
  22. Ertsen A.C.D., Alkemade J.R.M., Wassen M.J., Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity, nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands, Plant Ecol. 135 (1998) 113-124 [CrossRef].
  23. Goldblum D., The effects of treefall gaps on understorey vegetation in New York, USA, J. Veg. Sci. 8 (1997) 125-132.
  24. Gondard H., Deconchat M., Effects of soil surface disturbance after logging on plant functional types, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 725-732 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  25. Gray A.N., Spies T.A., Easter M.J., Microclimatic and soil moisture response to gap formation in coastal Douglas-fir forests, Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002) 332-343 [CrossRef].
  26. Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G., Hunt R., Comparative Plant Ecology. A functional approach to common British species, Unwin-Hyman, London, 1988.
  27. Halpern C.B., Early successional patterns of forest species: interactions of life history traits and disturbance, Ecology 70 (1989) 704-720.
  28. Hodkinson D.J., Askew A.P., Thompson K., Hodgson J.G., Bakker J.P., Bekker R.M., Ecological correlates of seed size in the British flora, Funct. Ecol. 12 (1998) 762-766 [CrossRef].
  29. Honnay O., Degroote B., Hermy M., Ancient-forest plant species in western Belgium: a species list and possible ecological mechanisms, Belg. J. Bot. 130 (1998) 139-154.
  30. Hughes J.W., Fahey T.J., Colonization of herbs and shrubs in a disturbed northern hardwood forest, J. Ecol. 79 (1991) 605-616.
  31. Jabiol B., Brêthes A., Ponge J.F., Toutain F., Brun J.-J., L'humus sous toutes ses formes, École Nationale du Génie Rurale, des Eaux et Forêts, Nancy, 1995.
  32. Larson B.C., Oliver C.D., Forest Stand Dynamics, update ed., John Wiley and sons Inc., New York, 1996, 520 p.
  33. Lavorel S., Mc Intyre S., Landsberg J., Forbes T.D.A., Plant functional classifications : from general groups to specific groups based on response disturbance, Trends Ecol. Evol. 12 (1997) 474-478 [CrossRef].
  34. Lavorel S., Rochette C., Lebreton J.-D., Functional groups for the response to disturbance in Mediterranean old fields, Oikos 84 (1999) 480-498.
  35. Matlack R.G., Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America, Ecology 75 (1994) 1491-1502.
  36. McCune B., Mefford M.J., PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, version 4, MjM Software Design, 1999, 237 p.
  37. Moore M.R., Vankat J.L., Response of the herb layer to the gap dynamics of a mature beech-maple forest, Am. Midl. Nat. 115 (1986) 336-347.
  38. Naem S., Wright J.P., Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem, Ecol. Lett. 6 (2003) 567-579 [CrossRef].
  39. Noirfalise A., Les stations forestières de Belgique, Presses agronomiques de Gembloux, 1984.
  40. Paré D., Van Cleve K., Soil nutrient availability and relationships with aboveground biomass production on postharvested upland white spruce sites in interior Alaska, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1223-1232.
  41. Parsons A.N., Knight D.H., Miller S.L., Root gap dynamics in lodgepole pine forest: nitrogen transformation in gaps of different size, Ecol. Appl. 4 (1994) 354-362.
  42. Peet R.K., Christensen N.L., Succession: a population process, Vegetatio 43 (1980) 486-499.
  43. Pickett S.T.A., McDonnell M.J., Changing perspectives in community dynamics, a theory of successional forces, Trends Ecol. Evol. 4 (1989) 241-245 [CrossRef].
  44. Pickett S.T.A., White P.S., The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 1985.
  45. Phillips D.L., Shure D.J., Patch-size effects on early succession in Southern Appalachian forests, Ecology 71 (1990) 204-212.
  46. Poulson T.L., Platt W.J., Gap light regimes influence canopy tree diversity, Ecology 70 (1989) 553-555.
  47. Rameau J.C., Les grands modèles de dynamique linéaire forestière observable en France, Liens avec les phénomènes cycliques, in : Dubois J.J., Gehu J.M. (Eds.), Colloques phytosociologiques, XX, Phytodynamique et biogeographie, historique des forêts, J. Cramer, Berlin Stuttgart, 1991, pp. 241-272.
  48. Runkle J.R., Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States, Ecology 62 (1981) 1041-1051.
  49. SAS institute inc., SAS Online Doc® 9. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2002.
  50. Schaffers A.P., Sykora K.V., Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements, J. Veg. Sci. 11 (2000) 225-244.
  51. Scheiner S.M., Measuring pattern diversity, Ecology 73 (1992) 1860-1867.
  52. Schumann M.E., White A.S., Witham J.W., The effects of harvest-created gaps on plant species diversity, composition, and abundance in a Maine oak-pine forest, For. Ecol. Manage. 176 (2003) 543-561.
  53. Schupp E.W., Howe H.F., Augspurger C.K., Levey D.J., Arrival and survival in tropical treefall gaps, Ecology. 70 (1989) 562-564.
  54. Shure D.J., Philips D.L., Litter fall patterns within different-sized disturbance patches in a southern Appalachian mountain forest, Am. Midl. Nat. 118 (1987) 348-357.
  55. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J., Biometry, 3rd ed., W.H. Freeman & Co., New York, 1995.
  56. Sousa P.W., The role of disturbance in natural communities, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15 (1984) 353-391 [CrossRef].
  57. Spies T.A., Halpern C.B., Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest, Ecol. Appl. 5 (1995) 913-934.
  58. Thompson K., Bakker J., Bekker R., The soil seed banks of North West Europe: methodology, density and longevity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
  59. Thompson K., Bakker J.P., Bekker R.M., Hodgson J.G., Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora, J. Ecol. 86 (1998) 163-169 [CrossRef].
  60. Tilman D., Knops J., Wedin D., Reich P., Ritchie M., Siemann E., The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes, Science 277 (1997) 1300-1302 [CrossRef].
  61. Ulanova N.G., The effects of windthrow on forests at different spatial scales: a review, For. Ecol. Manage. 135 (2000) 155-167.
  62. Van der Maarel E., Relations between sociological-ecological species groups and Ellenberg indicator values, Phytocoenologia 23 (1993) 343-362.
  63. Verheyen K., Gutenspergen G.R., Biesbrouck B., Hermy M., An integrated analysis of the effects of past land use on forest herb colonization at the landscape scale, J. Ecol. 91 (2003) 731-742 [CrossRef].
  64. Warr S.J., Kent M., Thompson K., Seed bank composition in five woodlands in South-West England, J. Biogeogr. 21 (1994) 151-168.
  65. Weiher E., Van der Werf A., Thompson K., Roderick M., Garnier E., Eriksson O., Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology, J. Veg. Sci. 10 (1999) 609-620.
  66. Wencélius E., Tempêtes de décembre 1999 : évaluation des dégâts forestiers par l'Inventaire forestier national, Rev. For. Fr. LIV, numéro special (2002) 20-30.
  67. Westoby M., Leishman M., Lord J., Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 351 (1996) 1309-1318.