Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 62, Number 7, November 2005
Page(s) 681 - 688
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005064
References of Ann. For. Sci. 62 681-688
  1. Alfaro R.I., He F., Kiss G., King J., Yanchuk A., Resistance of white spruce to white pine weevil: development of a resistance index, For. Ecol. Manage. 81 (1996) 51-62 [CrossRef].
  2. Alfaro R.I., Borden J.H., King J.N., Tomlin E.S., McIntosh R.L., Bohlmann J., Mechanisms of resistance in conifers against shoot infesting insects, in: M.R. Wagner et al. (Eds.), Mechanisms and deployment of resistance in trees to insects, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordnecht, The Netherlands, 2002, pp. 101-126.
  3. Alfaro R.I., vanAkker L., Jaquish B., King J., Weevil resistance of progeny derived from putatively resistant and susceptible interior spruce parents, For. Ecol. Manage. 202 (2004) 369-377 [CrossRef].
  4. Álvarez P., Rosa E., Vega P., Vega G., Rodríguez R., Viveros forestales y uso de planta forestal en repoblación en Galicia, in: Proceedings of III Congreso Forestal Nacional, Granada, 2001, pp. 232-238.
  5. Ayres M.P., Wilkens R.T., Ruel J.J., Lombardero M.J., Vallery E., Nitrogen budgets of phloem-feeding bark beetles with and without symbiotic fungi, Ecology 81 (2000) 2198-2210.
  6. Bratt K., Sunnerheim K., Nordenhem H., Nordlander G., Langstrom B., Pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) antifeedants from lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta), J. Chem. Ecol. 27 (2001) 2253-2262 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  7. Desprez Loustau M.L., Wagner K., Components of maritime pine susceptibility to twisting rust - a path coefficient analysis, Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103 (1997) 653-665 [CrossRef].
  8. Desprez Loustau M.L., Wagner K., Influence of silvicultural practices on twisting rust infection and damage in maritime pine, as related to growth, For. Ecol. Manage. 98 (1997) 135-147 [CrossRef].
  9. Falconer D.S., Introduction to quantitative genetics, Longman Scientific & Technical, 3rd ed., New York, 1989.
  10. Fritz R.S., Resistance of hybrid plants to herbivores: genes, environment, or both? Ecology 80 (1999) 382-391.
  11. Hannerz M., Thorsen A., Mattsson S., Weslien J., Pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to cuttings and seedlings of Norway spruce, For. Ecol. Manage. 160 (2002) 11-17 [CrossRef].
  12. Herms D.A., Mattson W.J., The dilemma of plants: to growth or defend, Q. Rev. Biol. 67 (1992) 283-335 [CrossRef].
  13. Jactel H., Kleinhentz M., Marpeau-Bezard A., Marion-Poll F., Menassieu P., Burban C., Terpene variation in maritime pine constitutive oleoresin related to host tree selection by Dyorictria sylvestrella Ratz. (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae), J. Chem. Ecol. 22 (1996) 1037-1050 [CrossRef].
  14. Jactel H., Kleinhentz M., Intensive sylvicultural practices increase the risk of infestation by Dioryctria sylvestrella Ratz (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), the Maritime pine stem borer, in: J.C. Grégoire et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Integrating cultural tactics into the management of bark beetle and reforestation pests, USDA, For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-236, 1997, pp. 177-190.
  15. King J.N., Yanchuk A.D., Kiss G.K., Alfaro R.I., Genetic and phenotypic relationships between weevil (Pissodes strobi) resistance and height growth in spruce populations of British Columbia, Can. J. For. Res. 27 (1997) 732-739 [CrossRef].
  16. King J.N., Alfaro R.I., Cartwright C., Genetic resistance of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) populations to the white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi): distribution of resistance, Forestry 77 (2004) 269-278 [CrossRef].
  17. Kiss G., Yanchuk A., Alfaro R.I., Carlson J.E., Manville J.F., Recent advances in research on white pine weevil attacking spruces in British Columbia, in: W.J. Mattson et al. (Eds.), Dynamics of forest herbivory: quest for pattern and principle, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-183, 1996, pp. 150-158.
  18. Kiss G.K., Yanchuk A.D., Preliminary evaluation of genetic variation of weevil resistance in interior spruce in British Columbia, Can. J. For. Res. 21 (1991) 230-234.
  19. Kleinhentz M., Raffin A., Jactel H., Genetic parameters and gain expected from direct selection for resistance to Dioryctria sylvestrella Ratz. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Pinus pinaster Ait., using a full diallel mating design, For. Genet. 5 (1998) 147-154.
  20. Kleinhentz M., Jactel H., Menassieu P., Terpene attractant candidates of Dyorictria sylvestrella in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) oleoresin, needles, liber and headspace samples, J. Chem. Ecol. 25 (1999) 2741-2757 [CrossRef].
  21. Klepzic K.D., Schlyter F., Laboratory evaluation of plant-derived antifeedants against the pine weevil Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), J. Econ. Entomol. 92 (1999) 644-650.
  22. Leather S.R., Day K.R., Salisbury A., The biology and ecology of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): a problem of dispersal? Bull. Entomol. Res. 89 (1999) 3-16.
  23. Lombardero M.J., Ayres M.P., Lorio P.L., Ruel J., Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defences of Pinus taeda, Ecol. Lett. 3 (2000) 329-339 [CrossRef].
  24. Loomis W.E., Growth-differentiation balance vs. carbohydrate-nitrogen ratio, Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 29 (1932) 240-245.
  25. Lorio P.L., Growth-differentiation balance: a basis for understanding southern pine beetle tree interactions, For. Ecol. Manage. 14 (1986) 259-273 [CrossRef].
  26. Lynch M., Walsh B., Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, 1997.
  27. Månsson P.E., Schlyter F., Hylobius pine weevils adult host selection and antifeedants: feeding behaviour on host and non-host woody scandinavian plants, Agr. For. Entomol. 6 (2004) 165-171.
  28. Mari S., Jansson G., Jonsson A., Genetic variation in nutrient utilization and growth traits in Picea abies seedlings, Scan. J. For. Res. 18 (2003) 19-28.
  29. Merino A., Rodríguez-López A., Brañas J., Rodríguez-Soalleiro R., Nutrition and growth in newly established plantations of Eucalyptus globulus in northwestern Spain, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 509-517 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  30. Namkoong G., Maintaining genetic diversity in breeding for resistance in forest trees, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 29 (1991) 325-342.
  31. Nordlander G., Host finding in the pine weevil Hylobius abietis: effects of conifer volatiles and added limonene, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 59 (1991) 229-237 [CrossRef].
  32. O'Reilly-Wapstra J.M., Potts B.M., McArthur C., Davies N.W., Effect of nutrient variability on the genetic-based resistance of Eucalyptus globulus to a mammalian herbivore and on plant defensive chemistry, Oecologia 142 (2005) 597-605.
  33. Orlander G., Nordlander G., Effects of field vegetation control on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to newly planted Norway spruce seedlings, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 667-673 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  34. Panda N., Khush G.S., Host Plant Resistance to Insects, CAB International, UK, 1995.
  35. Petersson M., Orlander G., Effectiveness of combinations of shelterwood, scarification, and feeding barriers to reduce pine weevil damage, Can. J. For. Res. 33 (2003) 64-73 [CrossRef].
  36. Quiring D., Turgeon J., Simpson D., Smith A., Genetically based differences in susceptibility of white spruce to the spruce bud moth, Can. J. For. Res. 21 (1991) 42-47.
  37. Rosner S., Hannrup B., Resin canal traits relevant for constitutive resistance of Norway spruce against bark beetles: environmental and genetic variability, For. Ecol. Manage. 200 (2004) 77-87 [CrossRef].
  38. Sánchez-Rodríguez F., Rodríguez-Soalleiro R., Español E., López C.A., Merino A., Influence of edaphic factors and tree nutritive status on the productivity of Pinus radiata D. Don plantations in northwest Spain, For. Ecol. Manage. 171 (2002) 181-189.
  39. SAS-Institute, SAS/STAT User's guide, Version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1999.
  40. Sydow F.V., Abundance of pine weevils (Hylobius abietis) and damage to conifer seedlings in relation to silvicultural practices, Scan. J. For. Res. 12 (1997) 157-167.
  41. Tadesse W., Auñón F.J., Pardos J.A., Gil L., Alía R., Evaluación precoz de la producción de miera en Pinus pinaster Ait., Investig. Agrar. Sist. Recur. For. 10 (2001) 141-150.
  42. Tuomi J., Fagerstrom T., Niemela P., Carbon allocation, phenotypic plasticity, and induced defenses, in: D.W. Tallamy, Raupp M.J. (Eds.), Phytochemical induction by herbivores, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1991, pp. 85-104.
  43. Van Akker L., Alfaro R., Brockley R., Effects of fertilization on resin canal defences and incidence of Pissodes strobi attack in interior spruce, Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004) 855-862 [CrossRef].
  44. Wainhouse D., Hylobius abietis - host utilisation and resistance, in: F. Lieutier et al. (Eds.), Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 2004, pp. 365-379.
  45. Waring G.L., Cobb N.S., The impact of plant stress on herbivore population dynamics, in: E.A. Bernays (Ed.), Insect-plant interactions, CRC, Boca Raton Fl, 1992, pp. 167-226.
  46. Wright J.W., Introduction to forest genetics, Academic Press, New York, 1976.
  47. Zas R., Foliar nutrient status and tree growth response of young Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb. (Franco) to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization in Galicia (Northwest Spain), Investig. Agrar. Sist. Recur. For. 12 (2003) 75-85.
  48. Zas R., Serrada R., Foliar nutrient status and nutritional relationships of young Pinus radiata D. Don plantations in north-west Spain, For. Ecol. Manage. 174 (2003) 167-176 [CrossRef].
  49. Zas R., Merlo E., Fernández-López J., Genetic parameter estimates for Maritime pine in the Atlantic coast of North-west Spain, For. Genet. 11 (2004) 45-53.
  50. Zas R., Fernández-López J., Juvenile genetic parameters and genotypic stability of Pinus pinaster Ait. open pollinated families under different water and nutrient regimes, For. Sci. 51 (2005) 165-174.
  51. Zas R., Sampedro L., Prada E., Lombardero M.J., Fernández-López J., Fertilization increases Hylobius abietis L. damage in Pinus pinaster Ait. seedlings, For. Ecol. Manage. (in press).