Open Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 62, Number 8, December 2005
Page(s) 845 - 851
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005075
Published online 15 December 2005
References of Ann. For. Sci. 62 845-851
  1. Anonymous, Forestry statistics 2002, Official Statistics of Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 2002, pp. 1-107.
  2. Brown S., Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges, Environ. Pollut. 116 (2002) 363-372 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  3. Feldhusen K., Hammarskjöld G., Mjureke D., Pettersson S., Sandberg T., Staaf H., Svensson U., Österberg K., Sweden's National Inventory Report 2004, Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.
  4. Fink S., Feldhusen K., Hammarskjöld G., Pettersson S., Staaf H., Österberg K., Adolfsson R., Ivarsson A., Lidén M., Petersson H., Sweden's National Inventory Report 2003, Submitted under the United Nations Convention on Climate Change, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2003.
  5. IPCC, Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry, IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, 2004.
  6. Jenkins J.C., Chojnacky D.C., Heath L.S., Birdsey R., National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species, For. Sci. 49 (2003) 12-35.
  7. Kauppi P.E., Mielikäinen K., Kuusela K., Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971 to 1990, Science 256 (1992) 70-74.
  8. Kauppi P.E., Tomppo E., Ferm A., C and N storage in living trees within Finland since 1950s, Plant Soil 168-169 (1995) 633-638.
  9. Laasasenaho J., Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch, Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 108 (1982) 1-74.
  10. Laitat E., Karjalainen T., Loustau D., Lindner M., Towards an integrated scientific approach for carbon accounting in forestry, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 4 (2000) 241-251.
  11. Lehtonen A., Mäkipää R., Heikkinen J., Sievänen R., Liski J., Biomass expansion factors (BEF) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 188 (2004) 211-224 [CrossRef].
  12. Löwe H., Seufert G., Raes F., Comparison of methods used within member states for estimating CO2 emissions and sinks according to UNFCCC and EU monitoring mechanism: forest and other wooded land, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 4 (2000) 315-319.
  13. Marklund L.G., Biomass functions for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. of Forest Survey, 1987, pp. 1-127.
  14. Marklund L.G., Biomassafunktioner för tall, gran och björk i Sverige, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Rapporter-Skog 45 (1988) 1-73.
  15. Milne R., van Oijen M., A comparison of two modelling studies of environmental effects on forest carbon stocks across Europe, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 911-923.
  16. Näslund M., Funktioner och tabeller för kubering av stående träd. Tall, gran och björk i södra Sverige samt i hela landet., Meddelande från Statens Skogsförsöksanstalt 36 (1947) 1-81.
  17. Ranneby B., Cruse T., Hägglund B., Jonasson H., Swärd J., Design a new national forest survey for Sweden, Stud. For. Suec. 177 (1987) 1-29.
  18. Schoene D., Assessing and reporting forest carbon stock changes for FRA, UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol: a concerted effort? in: Luhtala A., Varjo J. (Eds.), Proceedings of FAO expert consultation on global forest resource assessment 2002, Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 2002, pp. 290-297.
  19. Schroeder P., Brown S., Mo J., Birdsey R., Cieszewski C., Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data, For. Sci. 43 (1997) 424-434.
  20. Tomppo E., National forest inventory in Finland and its role in estimating the carbon balance of forests, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 4 (2000) 241-320.
  21. UN-ECE/FAO, Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand (industrialized temperate/boreal countries), UN-ECE/FAO Contribution to the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000, Main Report, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2000.
  22. Van Camp N., Vande Walle I., Mertens J., De Neve S., Samson R., Lust N., Lemeur R., Boeckx P., Lootens P., Beheydt D., Mestdagh I., Sleutel S., Verbeeck H., Van Cleemput O., Hofman G., Carlier L., Inventory-based carbon stock of Flemish forests: a comparison of European biomass expansion factors, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 677-682 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  23. Wirth C., Schumacher J., Schulze E.D., Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe - a meta-analysis approach towards prediction and uncertainty estimation, Tree Physiol. 24 (2004) 121-139 [PubMed].