Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 63, Number 1, January-February 2006
Page(s) 101 - 110
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005102
Published online 28 January 2006
References of Ann. For. Sci. 63 101-110
  1. Barthélémy D., Caraglio Y., Costes E., Architecture, gradients morphogénétiques et âge physiologique chez les végétaux, in: Bouchon J., de Reffye P., Barthélémy D. (Eds.), Modélisation et simulation de l'architecture des plantes, INRA Editions, Science Update, Paris, 1997, pp. 89-136.
  2. Bergström R., Danell K., Effects of simulated winter browsing by moose on morphology and biomass of two birch species, J. Ecol. 75 (1987) 533-544.
  3. Bossdorf O., Schröder S., Prati D., Auge H., Palatability and tolerance to simulated herbivory in native and introduced populations of Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae), Am. J. Bot. 91 (2004) 856-862.
  4. Brown C.L., McAlpine R.G., Kormanik P.P., Apical dominance and form in woody plants: a reappraisal, Am. J. Bot. 54 (1967) 153-162.
  5. Buck-Sorlin G.H., Bell A.D., Models of crown architecture in Quercus petraea and Q. robur: shoot lengths and bud numbers, Forestry 73 (2000) 1-19 [CrossRef].
  6. Caraglio Y., Barthélémy D., Revue critique des termes relatifs à la croissance et à la ramification des tiges des végétaux vasculaires, in: Bouchon J., de Reffye P., Barthélémy D. (Eds.), Modélisation et simulation de l'architecture des plantes, INRA Editions, Science Update, Paris, 1997, pp. 11-87.
  7. Chaar H., Colin F., Leborgne G., Artificial defoliation, decapitation of the terminal bud, and removal of the apical tip of the shoot in sessile oak seedlings and consequences on subsequent growth, Can. J. For. Res. 27 (1997) 1614-1621 [CrossRef].
  8. Chamberlin E.A., Aarsen L.W., The cost of apical dominance in white pine (Pinus strobus L.): growth in multi-stemmed versus single-stemmed trees, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 123 (1996) 268-272.
  9. Champagnat P., Formation of the trunk in woody plants, in: Tomlinson P.B., Zimmerman H. (Eds.), Tropical trees as living systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1976, pp. 401-422.
  10. Champagnat P., Rest and activity in vegetative buds of trees, Ann. Sci. For. 46 (1989) 9-26.
  11. Collin P., Badot P.-M., Millet B., Croissance rythmique et développement du chêne rouge d'Amérique, Quercus rubra L., cultivé en conditions contrôlées, Ann. Sci. For. 53 (1996) 1059-1069.
  12. Conti H.A., Características climáticas de la Patagonia, in: Correa M.N. (Ed.), Flora Patagónica VIII (I), INTA, Buenos Aires, 1998, pp. 31-47.
  13. Cornelissen J.H.C., Growth, morphology and leaf characteristics after simulated herbivory in Chinese subtropical evergreen saplings, Ecol. Res. 8 (1993) 143-150.
  14. Costes E., Reffye P. de, Lichou J., Guédon Y., Audubert A., Jay M., Stochastic modelling of apricot growth units and branching, Acta Hortic. 313 (1992) 89-98.
  15. Davidson C.G., Remphrey W.R., Shoot neoformation in clones of Fraxinus pennsylvanica in relation to genotype, site and pruning treatments, Trees 8 (1994) 205-212.
  16. Diehl P., Mazzarino M.J., Funes F., Fontenla S., Gobbi M., Ferrari J., Nutrient conservation strategies in native Andean-Patagonian forests, J. Veg. Sci. 14 (2003) 63-70.
  17. Eckstein R.L., Karlsson P.S., Weih M., Leaf life span and nutrient resorption as determinants of plant nutrient conservation in temperate-arctic regions, New Phytol. 143 (1999) 177-189 [CrossRef].
  18. Fink S., The occurrence of adventitious and proventitious buds within the bark of some temperate and tropical trees, Am. J. Bot. 70 (1983) 532-542.
  19. Frey B.R., Lieffers V.J., Landhäusser S.M., Comeau P.G., Greenway K.J., An analysis of sucker regeneration of trembling aspen, Can. J. For. Res. 33 (2003) 1169-1179 [CrossRef].
  20. Hallé F., Oldeman R.A.A., Essai sur l'architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux, Masson, Paris, 1970.
  21. Hallé F., Oldeman R.A.A., Tomlinson P., Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978.
  22. Hatta H., Honda H., Fisher J.B., Branching principles governing the architecture of Cornus kousa (Cornaceae), Ann. Bot. 84 (1999) 183-193 [CrossRef].
  23. Haukioja E., The influence of grazing on the evolution, morphology and physiology of plants as modular organisms, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 333 (1991) 241-247.
  24. Haukioja E., Koricheva J., Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants, Evol. Ecol. 14 (2000) 551-562 [CrossRef].
  25. Haukioja E., Ruohomäki K., Senn J., Suomela J., Walls M., Consequences of herbivory in the mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa): importance of the functional organization of the tree, Oecologia 82 (1990) 238-247 [CrossRef].
  26. Heuret P., Barthélémy D., Nicolini E., Atger C., Analyse des composantes de la croissance en hauteur et de la formation du tronc chez le chêne sessile, Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. (Fagaceae) en sylviculture dynamique, Can. J. Bot. 78 (2000) 361-373 [CrossRef].
  27. Hjältén J., Danell K., Ericson L., Effects of simulated herbivory and intraspecific competition on the compensatory ability of birches, Ecology 74 (1993) 1136-1142.
  28. Honda H., Hatta H., Fisher J.B., Branch geometry in Cornus kousa (Cornaceae): computer simulations, Am. J. Bot. 84 (1997) 745-755 [PubMed].
  29. Horn H.S., The adaptive geometry of trees, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1971.
  30. Loewe V., Toral M., Camelio M.E., López C., Monografía de coigüe, Nothofagus dombeyi, INFOR, CONAF, Santiago de Chile, 1997.
  31. Marquis R.J., Lill J.T., Piccinni A., Effect of plant architecture on colonization and damage by leaftying caterpillars of Quercus alba, Oikos 99 (2002) 531-537 [CrossRef].
  32. McCurdy W.D., Powell G.R., Syllepsis in Larix laricina: association of sylleptic branching with cross-sectional stem growth and stem form of saplings, Can. J. For. Res. 17 (1987) 1609-1619.
  33. McNaughton S.J., Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory, Oikos 40 (1983) 329-336.
  34. Milligan R.H., Insects damaging beech (Nothofagus) forests, Proc. New Zealand Ecol. Soc. 21 (1974) 32-40.
  35. Minitab, Data Analysis Software, standard version 7.1., State College Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, 1989.
  36. Mutke S., Sievänen R., Nikinmaa E., Perttunen J., Gil L., Crown architecture of grafted Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.): shoot growth and bud differentiation, Trees 19 (2005) 15-25 [CrossRef].
  37. Nicolini E., Barthélémy D., Heuret P., Influence de la densité du couvert forestier sur le développement architectural de jeunes chênes sessiles, Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. (Fagaceae), en régénération forestière, Can. J. Bot. 78 (2000) 1531-1544 [CrossRef].
  38. Parker T., Johnson F.D., Branching and terminal growth of western red cedar, Northwest Sci. 61 (1987) 7-12.
  39. Puntieri J.G., Barthélémy D., Martinez P., Raffaele E., Brion C., Annual-shoot growth and branching patterns in Nothofagus dombeyi (Fagaceae), Can. J. Bot. 76 (1998) 673-685 [CrossRef].
  40. Puntieri J.G., Pysek P., Branching and competitive hierarchies in populations of Galium aparine, Can. J. Bot. 76 (1998) 63-74 [CrossRef].
  41. Puntieri J.G., Raffaele E., Martinez P., Barthélémy D., Brion C., Morphological and architectural features of young Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. et Endl.) Krasser (Fagaceae), Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 130 (1999) 395-410.
  42. Puntieri J.G., Souza M.S., Barthélémy D., Brion C., Núñez M., Mazzini C., Preformation, neoformation, and shoot structure in Nothofagus dombeyi (Nothofagaceae), Can. J. Bot. 78 (2000) 1044-1054 [CrossRef].
  43. Puntieri J.G., Barthélémy D., Mazzini C., Brion C., Periods of organogenesis in shoots of Nothofagus dombeyi (Mirb.) Oerst. (Nothofagaceae), Ann. Bot. 89 (2002) 115-124 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  44. Puntieri J.G., Stecconi M., Barthélémy D., Preformation and neoformation in shoots of Nothofagus antarctica (G. Forster) Oerst. (Nothofagaceae) shrubs from northern Patagonia, Ann. Bot. 89 (2002) 665-673 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  45. Puntieri J.G., Souza M.S., Brion C., Mazzini C., Barthélémy D., Axis differentiation in two South American Nothofagus species (Nothofagaceae), Ann. Bot. 92 (2003) 589-599 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  46. Raffaele E., Puntieri J.G., Martinez P., Marino J., Brion C., Barthélémy D., Comparative morphology of annual shoots in seedlings of five Nothofagus species from Argentinean Patagonia, C. R. Acad. Sci. 321 (1998) 305-311.
  47. Rousseaux C., Julkunen-Tiitto R., Searles P.S., Scopel A.L., Aphalo P.J., Ballaré C.L., Solar UV-B radiation affects leaf quality and insect herbivory in the southern beech tree Nothofagus antarctica, Oecologia 138 (2004) 505-512 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  48. Rust S., Hüttl R.F., The effect of shoot architecture on hydraulic conductance in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Trees 14 (1999) 39-42.
  49. Scoppa C.O., Los suelos, in: Correa M.N. (Ed.), Flora Patagónica VIII (I), INTA, Buenos Aires, 1998, pp. 15-30.
  50. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J., Biometry, 2nd ed., Freeman and Co., New York, 1981.
  51. Souza M.S., Puntieri J.G., Barthélémy D., Brion C., Bud content and its relation to shoot size and structure in Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. et Endl.) Krasser (Nothofagaceae), Ann. Bot. 85 (2000) 547-555 [CrossRef].
  52. Strauss S.Y., Agrawal A.A., The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory, Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 (2003) 179-185.
  53. Watson M.A., Integrated physiological units in plants, Trends Ecol. Evol. 1 (1986) 119-123 [CrossRef].
  54. Wilson B.F., Apical control of branch growth and angle in woody plants, Am. J. Bot. 87 (2000) 601-607 [PubMed].
  55. Wilson B.F., Archer R.R., Tree design: some biological solutions to mechanical problems, Bioscience 29 (1979) 293-298.