Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 63, Number 2, March 2006
Page(s) 177 - 188
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005110
Published online 23 February 2006
References of Ann. For. Sci. 63 177-188
  1. AFES, A sound reference base for soils, INRA, Paris, 1998.
  2. Aubert M., Alard D., Bureau F., Diversity of plant assemblages in managed temperate forests: a case study in Normandy (France), For. Ecol. Manage. 175 (2003) 321-337 [CrossRef].
  3. Aubert M., Bureau F., Alard D., Bardat J., Effect of tree mixture on the humic epipedon and vegetation diversity in managed beech forest (Normandy, France), Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004) 233-248 [CrossRef].
  4. Aubert M., Hedde M., Decaëns T., Bureau F., Margerie P., Alard D., Effects of tree composition on earthworms and other macro-invertebrates in beech forests of Upper Normandy (France), Pedobiologia 47 (2003) 904-612.
  5. Baize B., Guide des analyses en pédologie, INRA Editions, Paris, 2000.
  6. Ballard T.M., Impacts of forest management on northern forest soils, For. Ecol. Manage. 133 (2000) 37-42 [CrossRef].
  7. Bardat J., Phytosociologie et écologie des forêts de Haute-Normandie : leur place dans le contexte sylvatique ouest-européen, Bull. Soc. Bot. Centre-Ouest (1993) 376.
  8. Beniamino F., Ponge J.-F., Arpin P., Soil acidification under the crown of oak trees: I. Spatial distribution, For. Ecol. Manage. 40 (1991) 221-232 [CrossRef].
  9. Bernier N., Fonctionnement biologique des humus et dynamique des pessières alpines. Le cas de la forêt de Macot-La-Plagne (Savoie), Ecologie 28 (1997) 23-44.
  10. Bernier N., Ponge J.-F., Humus form dynamics during the sylvogenetic cycle in a mountain spruce forest, Soil. Biol. Biochem. 26 (1994) 183-220 [CrossRef].
  11. Boerner R.E.J., Scherzer A.J., Brinkman J.A., Spatial patterns of inorganic N, P availability, and organic C in relation to soil disturbance: a chronosequence analysis, Appl. Soil Ecol. 7 (1998) 159-177 [CrossRef].
  12. Boettcher S.E., Kalisz P.J., Single-tree influence on soil properties in the mountains of eastern Kentucky, Ecology 71 (1990) 1365-1372.
  13. Bonneau M., Evolution of the mineral fertility of an acidic soil during a period on ten years in the Vosges mountains (France). Impact of humus mineralisation, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 253-260 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  14. Bonneau M., Souchier B., Pédologie. Tome 1 - Constituants et propriétés du sol, Masson, Paris, 1994.
  15. Brandtberg P.-O., Lundkvist H., Bengtsson J., Changes in forest-floor chemistry caused by birch admixture in Norway spruce stands, For. Ecol. Manage. 130 (2000) 253-264 [CrossRef].
  16. Brêthes A., Catalogue des stations forestières du nord de la Haute-Normandie, Office national des forêts, Paris, 1984.
  17. Brêthes A., Brun J.J., Jabiol B., Ponge J.F., Toutain F., Classification of forest humus forms: a French proposal, Ann. Sci. For. 52 (1995) 535-546.
  18. Brêthes A., Brun J.-J., Jabiol B., Ponge J.-F., Toutain F., Souchier B., Bouché M.B., Types of humus form in temperate forests, in: AFES (Eds.), A sound reference base for soils, INRA, Paris, 1998, pp. 266-282.
  19. Bringmark E., Bringmark L., Improved soil monitoring by use of spatial pattern, Ambio 27 (1998) 45-52.
  20. Brown A.H.F., Functioning of mixed-species stands at Gisburn, N.W. England, in: Cannell M.G.R., Malcolm D.C., Robertson P.A. (Eds.), The ecology of mixed-species stands of trees, Blackwelll Scientific Publications, 1992, pp. 125-150.
  21. Ciesielski H., Sterckeman T., Determination of cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations in soil by means of cobalt hexamine trichloride. Effects of experimental conditions, Agronomie 17 (1997) 1-7.
  22. Deconchat M., Effets des techniques d'exploitation forestière sur l'état de surface du sol, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 653-661 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  23. Deschaseaux A., Ponge J.-F., Changes in the composition of humus profiles near the trunk base of an oak tree (Quercus petraea (Mattus.) Liebl.), Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 37 (2001) 9-16 [CrossRef].
  24. Dyer B., On the analytical determination of probably available "mineral" plant food in soils, J. Chem. Soc. 65 (1894) 115-167.
  25. Epron D., Ngao J., Granier A., Interannual variation of soil respiration in a beech forest ecosystem over a six-year study, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 499-505 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  26. Espiau P., Peyronel A., L'acidité d'échange dans les sols. Méthode de détermination de l'aluminium échangeable et des protons échangeables, Sci. Sol 3 (1976) 161-175.
  27. ESRI, ArcGIS - Geostatistical analyst, ESRI, New-York, 2001.
  28. Ettema C.H., Wardle D.A., Spatial soil ecology, Tree 17 (2002) 177-183.
  29. FAO, World reference bases for soil resources, Rome, 1998.
  30. Ferrari J.B., Fine scale patterns of leaf litterfall and nitrogen cycling in an old-growth forest, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 291-302 [CrossRef].
  31. Garay I., Étude d'un écosystème forestier mixte: II. Les sols, Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 17 (1980) 525-541.
  32. Gobat J.-M., Aragno M., Matthey W., Le sol vivant, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, 1998.
  33. Green R.N., Trowbridge R.L., Klinka K., Towards a taxonomic classification of humus forms, For. Sci. Monogr. 29 (1993) 1-46.
  34. Jabiol B., Brêthes A., Ponge J.-F., Toutain F., Brun J.-J., L'humus sous toutes ses formes, ENGREF, Nancy, 1995.
  35. Jabiol B., Höltermann A., Gégout J.-C., Ponge J.-F., Brêthes A., Typologie des formes d'humus peu actives, Étude Gestion Sols 7 (2000) 133-154.
  36. Johnston K., Ver Hoef J.M., Krivoruchko K., Lucas N., Using ArcGIS Geostatistical analyst, ESRI, New York, 2001.
  37. Kolasa J., Rollo C.D., Introduction: the heterogeneity of heterogeneity, a glossary, in: Kolassa J., Pickett S.T.A. (Eds.), Ecological heterogeneity, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991, pp. 1-23.
  38. Laignel B., Quesnel F., Lecoustumier M.-N., Meyer R., Variability of the clay fraction of the clay with flints of the western part of the Paris Basin, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 326 (1998) 467-472.
  39. Lautridou J.-P., Le cycle périglaciaire pléistocène en Europe du Nord-Ouest et plus particulièrement en Normandie, Thesis, University of Caen, Caen, 1985.
  40. McMahon S., A survey method for assessing sites disturbance, New Zealand Logging Industry, Rotorua, 1995, 54 p.
  41. Michalet R., Gandoy C., Cadel G., Girard G., Grossi J., Joud D., Pache G., Humus functioning types in evergreen coniferous forests of the French Inner Alps., C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sci. Vie 324 (2001) 59-70.
  42. Morris S.J., Spatial distribution of fungal and bacterial biomass in southern Ohio hardwood forest soils: fine scale variability and microscale patterns, Soil. Biol. Biochem. 31 (1999) 1375-1386 [CrossRef].
  43. Möttönen M., Jarvinen E., Hokkanen T.J., Kuuluvainen T., Ohtonen R., Spatial distribution of soil ergosterol in the organic layer of a mature Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forest, Soil. Biol. Biochem. 31 (1999) 503-516 [CrossRef].
  44. Muys B., The influence of tree species on humus quality and nutrient availability on a regional scale (Flanders, Belgium), in: Nilsson L.O., Hüttl R.F., Johansson U.T. (Eds.), Nutrient uptake and cycling in forest ecosystems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1995, pp. 649-660.
  45. Neirynck J., Mirtcheva S., Sioen G., Lust N., Impact of Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Fraxinus excelsior L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., Quercus robur L., and Fagus sylvatica L. on earthworm biomass and physico-chemical properties of loamy topsoil, For. Ecol. Manage. 133 (2000) 275-286 [CrossRef].
  46. Ponge J.-F., Prat B., Les collemboles, indicateurs du mode d'humification dans les peuplements résineux, feuillus et mélangés: résultats obtenus en forêt d'Orléans, Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 19 (1982) 237-250.
  47. Ponge J.-F., Delhaye L., The heterogeneity of humus profiles and earthworm communities in a virgin beech forest, Biol. Fertil. Soils 20 (1995) 20-24.
  48. Ponge J.-F., Ferdy J., Growth of Fagus sylvatica in an old-growth forest as affected by soil and light conditions, J. Veg. Sci. 8 (1997) 789-796.
  49. Prescott C.E., Maynard D.G., Laiho R., Humus in northern forests: friend or foe? For. Ecol. Manage. 133 (2000) 23-36 [CrossRef].
  50. Qian H., Klinka K., Spatial variability of humus forms in some coastal forest ecosystems of British Columbia, Ann. For. Sci. 52 (1995) 653-666.
  51. Rossi J.-P., Delaville L., Quénéhervé P., Microspatial structure of plant-parasitic nematode community in a sugarcane field in Martinique, Appl. Soil Ecol. 3 (1996) 17-26 [CrossRef].
  52. Rossi J.P., Lavelle P., Ebagnerin-Tondoh J., Statistical tool for soil biology X. Geostatistical analysis, Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 31 (1995) 1-9.
  53. Saetre P., Baath E., Spatial variation and patterns of soil microbial community structure in a mixed spruce-birch stand, Soil. Biol. Biochem. 32 (2000) 909-917 [CrossRef].
  54. Schütz J.-P., Sylviculture 2 : la gestion des forêts irrégulières et mélangées, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, 1997.
  55. SSAJ, Glossary of soil science terms, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA, 1997.
  56. Statistix, Analytical Software, Analytical Software Publisher, Tallahassee, 1998.
  57. Sulkava P., Huhta V., Habitat patchiness affects decomposition and faunal diversity: a microcosm experiment on forest floor, Oecologia 116 (1998) 390-396 [CrossRef].
  58. Tenenhaus M., Young F.W., An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data, Psychometrika 50 (1985) 91-119 [MathSciNet].
  59. Thioulouse J., Chessel D., Doledec S., Olivier J.M., ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software, Stat. Comput. 7 (1997) 75-83 [CrossRef].
  60. Toutain F., Activité biologique des sols, modalité et lithodépendance, Biol. Fertil. Soils 3 (1987) 31-38.
  61. Webster R., Oliver M.A., Geostatistics for environmental scientists, John Wiley & Sons, England, 2001.
  62. Wiens J.A., Ecological heterogeneity: an ontogeny of concepts and approaches, in: Hutchings M.J., John E.A., Stewart A.J. (Eds.), Ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity, Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2000, pp. 8-30.