Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 65, Number 8, December 2008
Article Number 801
Number of page(s) 8
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008064
Published online 04 December 2008
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 65 (2008) 801
  1. Abrams M.D., 1990. Adaptations and responses to drought in Quercus species of North America. Tree Physiol. 7: 227–238 [PubMed].
  2. Beon M. and Bartsch N., 2003. Early seedling growth of pine (Pinus densiflora) and oaks (Quercus serrata, Q. mongolica, Q. variabilis) in response to light intensity and soil moisture. Plant Ecol. 167: 97–105 [CrossRef].
  3. Blake T.J. and Tschaplinski T.J., 1986. Role of water relations and photosynthesis in the release of buds from apical dominance and the early reinvigoration of decapitated poplars. Physiol. Plant. 68: 287–293 [CrossRef].
  4. Bond W.J. and Midgley J.J., 2001. Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 45–51 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  5. Borchert R., 1975. Endogenous shoot growth rhythms and indeterminate shoot growth in oak. Physiol. Plant. 35: 152–157 [CrossRef].
  6. Bourdeau P., 1954. Oak seedling ecology determining segregation of species in Piedmont oak-hickory forests. Ecol. Monogr. 24: 297–320 [CrossRef].
  7. Cecich R.A., 1993. Flowering and oak regeneration. In: Loftis D.L. and C.E. McGee (Eds.), Oak Regeneration: Serious Problems Practical Recommendations, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, pp. 79–95.
  8. Chaar H., Colin F., and Collet C., 1997. Effects of environmental factors on the shoot development of Quercus petraea seedlings. A methodological approach. For. Ecol. Manage. 97: 119–131.
  9. Collet C. and Frochot H., 1996. Effects of interspecific competition on periodic shoot elongation in oak seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 1934–1942 [CrossRef].
  10. Collet C., Ningre F., and Frochot H., 1998. Modifying the microclimate around young oaks through vegetation manipulation: effects on seedling growth and branching. For. Ecol. Manage. 110: 249–262 [CrossRef].
  11. Cowan I.R., 1994. As to the mode of action of guard cells in dry air. In: Schulze, E.D. and M.M. Caldwell (Eds.), Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 205–229.
  12. Crow T.R., 1988. Reproductive mode and mechanism for self-replacement of northern red oak (Quercus rubra) – a review. For. Sci. 34: 19–40.
  13. Dickson R.E., Isebrands J.G., and Tomlinson P.T., 1990. Distribution and metabolism of current photosynthate by single-flush northern red oak seedlings. Tree Physiol. 7: 65–77 [PubMed].
  14. Dickson R.E., Tomlinson P.T., and Isebrands J.G., 2000a. Allocation of current photosynthates and changes in tissue dry weight within northern red oak seedlings: individual leaf and flush carbon contribution during episodic growth. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1296–1307 [CrossRef].
  15. Dickson R.E., Tomlinson P.T., and Isebrands. J.G., 2000b. Partitioning of current photosynthate to different chemical fractions in leaves, stems, and roots of northern red oak seedlings during episodic growth. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1308–1317 [CrossRef].
  16. Fitter A.H. and Hay R.K.M., 1987. Environmental physiology of plants. Second Ed., Academic Press, London, 423 p.
  17. Gardiner E.S. and J.D. Hodges. 1998. Growth and biomass distribution of cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) seedlings as influenced by light availability. For. Ecol. Manage. 108: 127–134.
  18. Gardiner E.S., Russell D.R., Oliver M., and Dorris L.C. Jr, 2002. Bottomland hardwood afforestation: state of the art. In: Holland M.M., Warren M.L., and Stanturf J.A., (Eds.), Proc. Conference on Sustainability of Wetlands and Water Resources: How Well Can Riverine Wetlands Continue to Support Society into the 21st Century? USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-50, pp. 75–86.
  19. Geiger D.R., 1987. Understanding interactions of source and sink regions of plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 25: 659–666.
  20. Gottschalk K.W., 1994. Shade, leaf growth and crown development of Quercus rubra, Quercus velutina, Prunus serotina and Acer rubrum seedlings. Tree Physiol. 14: 735–749 [PubMed].
  21. Hanson P.J., Dickson R.E., Isebrands J.G., Crow T.R., and Dixon R.K., 1986. A morphological index of Quercus seedling ontogeny for use in studies on physiology and growth. Tree Physiol. 2: 273–281 [PubMed].
  22. Hodges J.D., 1967. Patterns of photosynthesis under natural environmental conditions. Ecol. 48: 234–242 [CrossRef].
  23. Isebrands J.G. and Nelson N.D., 1983. Distribution of [ 14C] -labeled photosynthates within intensively cultured Populus cones during the establishment year. Physiol. Plant. 59: 9–18 [CrossRef].
  24. Isebrands J.G. and Dickson R.E., 1991. Measuring carbohydrate production and distribution: radiotracer techniques and applications. In: Lassoie J.P., and Hinckley T.M., (Eds.), Techniques and Approaches in Forest Tree Ecophysiology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 358–385.
  25. Jenkins M.W., and Chambers J.L., 1989. Understory light levels in mature hardwood stands after partial overstory removal. For. Ecol. Manage. 26: 247–256 [CrossRef].
  26. Johnson P.S., Shifley S.R., and Rogers R., 2002. The ecology and silviculture of oaks, CABI Pub., Oxon, UK, 503 p.
  27. Kammesheidt L., 1998. The role of tree sprouts in the restoration of stand structure and species diversity in tropical moist forest after slash-and-burn agriculture in Eastern Paraguay. Plant Ecol. 139: 155–165 [CrossRef].
  28. Kolb T.E., Steiner K.C., McCormick L.H., and Bowersox T.W., 1990. Growth response of northern red-oak and yellow-poplar seedlings to light, soil moisture and nutrients in relation to ecological strategy. For. Ecol. Manag. 38: 65–78 [CrossRef].
  29. Kruger E.L. and Reich P.B., 1993a. Coppicing alters ecophysiology of Quercus rubra saplings in Wisconsin forest openings. Physiol. Plant. 89: 741–750 [CrossRef].
  30. Kruger E.L. and Reich P.B., 1993b. Coppicing affects growth, root:shoot relations and ecophysiology of potted Quercus rubra seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 89: 751–760 [CrossRef].
  31. Lockhart B.R., Hodges J.D., Gardiner E.S., and Ezell A.W., 2003. Photosynthate distribution patterns in cherrybark oak seedling sprouts. Tree Physiol. 23: 1137–1146 [PubMed].
  32. Lorimer C.G., 1993. Causes of the oak regeneration problem. In: Loftis D.L. and McGee C.E., (Eds.), Oak Regeneration: Serious Problems Practical Recommendations, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, pp. 14–39.
  33. Peterson R.G., 1985. Design and analysis of experiments, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 429 p.
  34. Reich P.B., Teskey R.O., Johnson P.S. and Hinckley T.M., 1980. Periodic root and shoot growth in oak. For. Sci. 26: 590–598.
  35. Sander I.V., 1971. Height growth of new oak sprouts depends on size of advance reproduction. J. For. 69: 809–811.
  36. Sander I.V., 1972. Size of oak advance reproduction: key to growth following harvest cutting. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NC-79, 6 p.
  37. SAS, 1985. SAS/STAT$^{\rm TM}$ guide for personal computers, version 6 ed, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 378 p.
  38. Taylor J.S., Blake T.J., and Pharis R.P., 1982. The role of plant hormones and carbohydrates in the growth and survival of coppiced Eucalyptus seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 55: 421–430 [CrossRef].
  39. Tschaplinski T.J. and Blake T.J., 1989a. Photosynthetic reinvigoration of leaves following shoot decapitation and accelerated growth of coppice shoots. Physiol. Plant. 75: 157–165 [CrossRef].
  40. Tschaplinski T.J. and Blake T.J., 1989b. The role of sink demand in carbon partitioning and photosynthetic reinvigoration following shoot decapitation. Physiol. Plant. 75: 166–173 [CrossRef].
  41. Turgeon R., 1989. The sink-source transition in leaves. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 40: 119–138 [CrossRef].
  42. Tworkoski T.J., Ross M.S., and Hopper G.M., 1990. Analysis of chestnut and scarlet oak stump sprout growth. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 112–116 [CrossRef].
  43. van Hees A.F.M., 1997. Growth and morphology of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings in relation to shading and drought. Ann. Sci. For. 54: 9–18 [CrossRef].
  44. Watt R.F., 1979. The need for adequate regeneration in oak stands. In: Holt, H.A. and B.C. Fischer (Eds.), Proc. Regenerating Oaks in Upland Hardwood Forests, Purdue Univ., Lafayette, IN, pp. 11–17.
  45. Welander N.T. and Ottosson B., 1998. The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. For. Ecol. Manage. 107: 117–126 [CrossRef].
  46. Ziegenhagen B. and Kausch W., 1995. Productivity of young shaded oaks (Quercus robur L.) as corresponding to shoot morphology and leaf anatomy. For. Ecol. Manage. 72:97–108.