Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 65, Number 8, December 2008
Article Number 810
Number of page(s) 8
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008062
Published online 04 December 2008
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 65 (2008) 810
  1. Collardet J. and Besset J., 1988. Bois commerciaux, Tome 1, les résineux (conifères), CTBA, 278 p.
  2. Fields S., 2001. Caution-children at play: how dangerous is CCA? Environ. Health Perspective, 109: 262–269.
  3. Gambetta A., Susco D., and Zanuttini R., 2004. Determination of the natural durability of larch wood (Larix decidua Mill.) from the Western Italian Alps. Holzforschung 58: 678–681 [CrossRef].
  4. Gierlinger N., 2003. Chemistry, colour and brown-rot decay resistance of larch heartwood and FT-NIR based prediction models, Dissertation, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien, 129 p.
  5. Gierlinger N. and Wimmer R., 2004. Radial distribution of heartwood extractives and lignin in mature European larch. Wood Fiber Sci. 36: 387–394.
  6. Gierlinger N., Jacques D., Marchal M., Wimmer R., Schwanninger M., and Pâques L.E., 2002. Heartwood extractives and natural durability of larch – Relationships and their prediction by FT-NIR spectroscopy. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Gap (Hautes-Alpes) – Auvergne & Limousin, September 16–21, pp. 414-421.
  7. Gierlinger N., Jacques D., Schwanninger M., Wimmer R., Hinterstoisser B., and Pâques L.E., 2003. Rapid prediction of natural durability of larch heartwood using Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 1727–1736 [CrossRef].
  8. Gierlinger N., Jacques D., Grabner M., Wimmer R., Schwanninger M., Rozenberg P., and Pâques L.E., 2004a. Colour of larch heartwood and relationships to brown-rot decay-resistance. Trees 18: 102–108.
  9. Gierlinger N., Jacques D., Schwanninger M., Wimmer R., and Pâques L.E., 2004b. Heartwood extractives and lignin content of different larch species (Larix sp.) and relationships to brown-rot decay-resistance. Trees 18: 230–236.
  10. Harju A.M. and Venäläinen M., 2002. Genetic parameters regarding the resistance of Pinus sylvestris heartwood to decay caused by C. Puteana. Scand. J. For. Res. 17: 199–205 [CrossRef].
  11. Harju A.M., Venäläinen M., Beuker E., Velling P., and Viitanen H., 2001. Genetic variation in the decay resistance of Scots pine wood against brown rot fungus. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 1244–1249 [CrossRef].
  12. Jacques D., 1991. Synthèse des résultats des tests de provenances de mélèze d'Europe en Belgique. Trav. Sta. Rech. Forest., Gembloux, Sér. E, 8, 39 p.
  13. Jacques D., Curnel Y., Jourez B., and Pâques L.E., 2002. Among and within provenance variability for decay resistance of larch wood to fungi. Improvement of Larch (Larix sp.) for better growth, stem form and wood quality. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Gap (Hautes-Alpes) – Auvergne & Limousin, September 16–21, pp. 405-413.
  14. NBN- EN 350-1, 1994. Durabilité du bois et des matériaux dérivés du bois – Durabilité naturelle du bois massif – Partie 1: Guide des principes d'essai et de classification, de la durabilité naturelle du bois.
  15. NBN- EN 350-2, 1994. Durabilité du bois et des matériaux dérivés du bois - Durabilité naturelle du bois massif – Partie 2: Guide de la durabilité naturelle du bois et de l'imprégnabilité d'essences de bois choisies pour leur importance en Europe.
  16. Nilsson T., 1997. Natural durability of larch heartwood against decay. Internat. Res. Group on Wood Pres., Stockholm, IRG Doc. No. IRG/WP 97-10201, 22 p.
  17. Pâques L., 1989. A critical review of larch hybridization and its incidence on breeding strategies. Ann. Sci. For. 46: 141–153 [CrossRef].
  18. Pâques L.E., 1996a. Variabilité naturelle du mélèze. I. Mélèze d'Europe: bilan de 34 ans de test comparatif de provenances. Ann. Sci. For. 53: 51–67.
  19. Pâques L.E., 1996b. Variabilité naturelle du mélèze. II. Mélèze du Japon: bilan de 36 ans de test comparatif de provenances. Ann. Sci. For. 53: 69–78.
  20. Pâques L.E., 2001. Genetic control of heartwood content in larch. Silvae Genet. 50: 69–75.
  21. Pâques L.E., 2002. Heterosis in interspecific hybrids between European and Japanese larch. Improvement of Larch (Larix sp.) for better growth, stem form and wood quality. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Gap (Hautes-Alpes) – Auvergne & Limousin, September 16–21, pp. 155-163.
  22. Pechmann von H. and Schaile O., 1955. Untersuchtungen über die Holzeigenschaften japanischer Lärchen. Forstwiss. Centr. Bl. 74: 87–113 [CrossRef].
  23. Philippe G., Curnel Y., Jacques D., Lee S., and Matz S., 2002. Performances of hybrid larch (Larix $\times$ eurolepis Henry) varieties across Europe: early results for survival, stem form and growth rate. In: Improvement of Larch (Larix sp.) for better growth, stem form and wood quality, proceedings of an International Symposium, Gap (Hautes-Alpes) – Auvergne & Limousin, September 16–21, pp. 127-139.
  24. Rapp A., Viitanen H., and Nilsson T., 2002. The influence of natural durability of four different Larix species to their possible end-use in construction industry. In: Wood in construction industry: prospectives of reconstruction, Inter. Conf. Proc., Zagreb, Croatia, 19th April, pp. 11–16.
  25. R Development Core Team, 2005. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org.
  26. Sailer M. and van Etten B., 2004. Potential wood protection strategies using physiological requirements of wood degrading fungi. HERON 49: 327–337.
  27. SAS Institute Inc, 2003. SAS for windows, Cary, NC, USA.
  28. Schneck V., Schneck D., Grotehusmann H., and Pâques L.E., 2002. Techniques of hybrids larch over a broad range of site conditions. In: Improvement of Larch (Larix sp.) for better growth, stem form and wood quality, proceedings of an International Symposium, Gap (Hautes-Alpes) – Auvergne & Limousin, September 16–21, pp. 119–126.
  29. Schöber R., 1977. Vom II. Internationalen Lärchenprovenienzversuch. Ein Beitrag zur Lärchenherkunftsfrage. Schriftenreihe der Forestlichen Fakultät Göttingen, 358 p.
  30. Srinivasan U., Ung. T., Taylor A., and Cooper P.A., 1999. Natural durability and waterborne preservative treatability of tamarack. For. Prod. J. 49: 82–87.
  31. US Forest Service, 1967. Comparative Decay Resistance of Heartwood of Native Species, Research note FPL 0153, 2 p.
  32. Van Acker J., Stevens M., Carey J., Sierra-Alvarez R., Militz H., Le Bayon I., Kleist G., and Peek R.D., 2003. Biological durability of wood in relation to end-use. Holz Roh Werkst. 61: 35–45 [CrossRef].
  33. Venäläinen M., Harju A.M., Nikkanen T., Paajanen L., Velling P., and Viitanen H., 2001. Genetic variation in the decay resistance of Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) wood. Holzforschung 55: 1–6.
  34. Venäläinen M., Harju A.M., Kainulainen P., Viitanen H., and Nikulainen, 2003. Variation in the decay resistance and its relationship with other wood characteristics in old Scots pines. Ann. For. Sci. 60: 409–417 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  35. Viitanen H., Paajan L., Saranpaa P., and Viitaniemi P., 1997. Durability of larch (Larix spp.) wood against brown-rot fungi. Group on Wood Pres., Whistler, BC, Canada, IRG Doc. N° IRG/WP 97-10228, 8 p.
  36. Windeisen E., Wegener G., Lesnino G., and Schumacher P., 2002. Investigation of the correlation between extractives content and natural durability in 20 cultivated larch trees. Holz Roh Werkst. 60: 373–374 [CrossRef].