Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 66, Number 2, March 2009
Article Number 207
Number of page(s) 10
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest/2008089
Published online 28 February 2009
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 66 (2009) 207
  1. Agee J.K., 1998. The landscape ecology of western forest fire regimes. Northwest Sci. 72: 24–34.
  2. Agee J.K., 2003. Monitoring postfire tree mortality in mixed-conifer forests of Crater Lake, Oregon, USA Nat. Areas J. 23: 114–120.
  3. Agee J.K. and Lolley M.R., 2006. Thinning and prescribed fire effects on fuels and potential fire behavior in an eastern Cascades forest, Washington, USA. Fire Ecology 2: 142–158.
  4. Agee J.K. and Skinner C.N., 2005. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 211: 83–96 [CrossRef].
  5. Arabas K.B., 1997. Fire and vegetation dynamics in the eastern serpentine barrens. Ph.D. dissertation: Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
  6. Arabas K.B., Hadley K.S., and Larson E.R., 2006. Fire history of a naturally fragmented landscape in central Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 1108–1120 [CrossRef].
  7. Barbour M., Kelley E., Maloney P., Rizzo D., Royce E., and Fites-Kaufmann J., 2002. Present and past old-growth forests of the Lake Tahoe Basin, Sierra Nevada, US. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 461–472 [CrossRef].
  8. Belsky J.A. and Blumenthal D.M., 1997. Effects of livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in upland forests of the interior west. Conserv. Biol. 11: 315–327 [CrossRef].
  9. Bilgili E., 2003. Stand development and fire behavior. For. Ecol. Manage. 179: 333–339 [CrossRef].
  10. Brose P. and Wade D., 2002. Potential fire behavior in pine flatwood forests following three different fuel reduction techniques. For. Ecol. Manage. 163: 71–84 [CrossRef].
  11. Brown J.K., Oberheu R.D., and Johnston C.M., 1982. Handbook for inventorying surface fuels and biomass in the interior west. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-129.
  12. Brown J.K. and See T.K., 1981. Downed woody fuel and biomass in the Northern Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-117.
  13. Bull E.L., Parks C.G., and Torgersen T.R., 1997. Trees and logs important to wildlife in the interior Columbia River Basin. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-391.
  14. Chen J., Franklin J.F., and Spies T.A., 1995. Growing-season microclimatic gradients from clearcut edges into old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol. Appl. 5: 74–86 [CrossRef].
  15. Cooper C.F., 1960. Changes in vegetation, structure, and growth of southwestern pine forests since white settlement. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 129–164 [CrossRef].
  16. Covington W. and Moore M.M., 1994. Southwestern ponderosa forest structure: Changes since Euro-American settlement. J. For. 92: 39–47.
  17. Deeming J.E., Burgan R.E., and Cohen J.D., 1977. The National Fire-Danger Rating System. USDA Forest Service GTR INT-39.
  18. DeLong S.C. and Kessler W.B., 2000. Ecological characteristics of mature forest remnants left by wildfire. For. Ecol. Manage. 131: 93–106 [CrossRef].
  19. Ganey J.L., 1999. Snag density and composition of snag populations on two national forests in northern Arizona. For. Ecol. Manage. 117: 169–178 [CrossRef].
  20. Hadley K.S., 1994. The role of disturbance, topography, and forest structure in the development of a montane forest landscape. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 121: 47–61 [CrossRef].
  21. Harmon M.E., Franklin J.F., Swanson F.J., Sollins P., Gregory S.V., Lattin J.D., Anderson N.H., Cline S.P., Aumen N.G., Seddel J.R., Lienkaemper G.W., Cromack K., and Cummins K.W., 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15: 133–302.
  22. Harrington M.G., 1981. Preliminary burning prescriptions for ponderosa pine fuel reductions in southeastern Arizona. USDA Forest Service Research Note RM-402.
  23. Hessburg P.F, Smith B.G., Salter R.B., Ottmar R.D., and Alvarado E., 2000. Recent changes (1930s-1990s) in spatial patterns of interior northwest forests, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 136: 53–83 [CrossRef].
  24. Hessburg P.F. and Agee J.K., 2003. An environmental narrative of Inland Northwest United States forests, 1800–2000. For. Ecol. Manage. 178: 23–59 [CrossRef].
  25. Hrinkevich K.H., 2005. Forest edge dynamics in a naturally fragmented landscape in central Oregon. M.S. thesis, Portland State University, Oregon, 108 p.
  26. Kauffman J.B. and Martin R.E., 1989. Fire behavior, fuel consumption, and forest-floor changes following prescribed understory fire in Sierra Nevada mixed conifer stands. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 455–462 [CrossRef].
  27. Knapp E.E., Keeley J.E., Ballenger E.A., and Brennan T.J., 2005. Fuel reduction and coarse woody debris dynamics with early season and late season prescribed fire in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest For. Ecol. Manage. 208: 383–397 [CrossRef].
  28. Lehmkuhl J.F., Kennedy M., Ford E.D., Singleton P.H., Gaines W.L., and Lind R.L., 2007. Seeing the forest for the fuel: Integrating ecological values and fuels management. For. Ecol. Manage. 246: 73–80 [CrossRef].
  29. McKenzie D., Raymond C.L., Kellogg L.-K.B., Norheim R.A., Andreu A.G., Bayard A.C., Kopper K.E., and Elman E., 2007. Mapping fuels at multiple scales: landscape application of the Fuel Characteristic Classification System. Can. J. For. Res. 37: 2421–2437 [CrossRef].
  30. Moore M.M., Covington W.W., and Fule P.Z., 1999. Evolutionary environment, reference conditions, and ecological restoration: a southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecol. Appl. 9: 1266–1277 [CrossRef].
  31. Oregon Climate Service (OCS), 2006. Oregon climate zone data (online). Available at: http://ocs.oce.orst.edu.
  32. Perrakis D.D.B. and Agee J.K., 2006. Seasonal fire effects on mixed-conifer forest structure and ponderosa pine resin properties. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 238–264 [CrossRef].
  33. Peterson N.V. and Groh E.A., 1969. The ages of some Holocene volcanic eruptions in the Newberry Volcano area, Oregon. Ore Geol. 31: 73–87.
  34. Pohl K.A., Hadley K.S., and Arabas K.B., 2002. A 545-year drought reconstruction for central Oregon. Phys. Geogr. 23: 302–320 [CrossRef].
  35. Rabe M.J., Morrell T.E., Green H., deVos Jr. J.C., and Miller C.R., 1998. Characteristics of ponderosa pine snag roosts used by reproductive bats in northern Arizona. J. Wildl. Manage. 62: 612–621 [CrossRef].
  36. Reinhardt E.D., Keane R.E., Calkin D.E., and Cohen J.D., 2008. Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States. For. Ecol. Manage. (in press).
  37. Robertson P.A. and Bowser Y.H., 1999. Coarse woody debris in mature Pinus ponderosa stands in Colorado. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 126: 255–267 [CrossRef].
  38. Speer J.H., Swetnam T.W., Wickman B.E., and Youngblood A., 2001. Changes in pandora moth outbreak dynamics during the past 622 years. Ecology 82: 679–697 [CrossRef].
  39. Spies T.A., Franklin J.F., and Thomas T.B., 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69: 1689–1702 [CrossRef].
  40. Stanton S.M., 2007. The fire ecology of mature ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) stands infected with western dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium campylopodum). Ph.D. dissertation, Portland State University, Oregon.
  41. Stephens S.L., 2004. Fuel loads, snag abundance, and snag recruitment in an unmanaged Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forest in Northwestern Mexico. For. Ecol. Manage. 199: 103–113 [CrossRef].
  42. Stephens S.L., Fry D.J., Granco-Vizcaino E., Collins B.M., and Moghaddas J.M., 2007. Coarse woody debris and canopy cover in an old-growth Jeffrey pine-mixed conifer forest from the Sierra San Pedro Martir, Mexico. For. Ecol. Manage. 240: 87–95 [CrossRef].
  43. Stephens S.L., Fry D.L., and Franco-Vizcaíno E., 2008. Wildfire and spatial patterns in forests in northwestern Mexico: the United States wishes it had similar fire problems. Ecol. Soc. (in press).
  44. Stephens S.L. and Moghaddas J.J., 2005a. Fuel treatment effects on snags and coarse woody debris in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 214: 53–64 [CrossRef].
  45. Stephens S.L. and Moghaddas J.J., 2005b. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 215: 21–36 [CrossRef].
  46. Stratton R.D., 2004. Assessing the effectiveness of landscape fuel treatments on fire growth. J. For. 102: 32–40.
  47. Stokes M.A. and Smiley T.L., 1996. An Introduction to Tree-Ring Dating. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.
  48. Ter Braak C.J.F., 1986., Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.
  49. Ter Braak C.J.F., 1998. CANOCO v 3.1 program for canonical community ordination. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  50. Van Wagtendonk J.W., Benedict J.M., and Sydoriak W.S., 1998. Fuel bed characteristics of Sierra Nevada conifers. West. J. Appl. For. 13: 73–84.
  51. Wales B.A., 1972. Vegetation analysis of north and south edges in a mature Oak-Hickory forest. Ecol. Monogr. 42: 451–471 [CrossRef].
  52. Weatherspoon C.P. and McIver J.D., 2000. A national study of the consequences of fire and fire surrogate treatments. Executive Summary for the Fire and Fire Surrogate Study. Available online: http://frames.nbii.gov/ffs.
  53. Weaver H., 1959. Ecological changes in the ponderosa pine forest of Warm Springs Indian Reservation in Oregon. J. For. 57: 15–20.
  54. Westfall J.A. and Woodall C.W., 2007. Measurement repeatability of a large-scale inventory of forest fuels. For. Ecol. Manage. 253: 171–176 [CrossRef].
  55. Yamaguchi D.K., 1991. A simple method for cross-dating increment cores from living trees. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 414–416 [CrossRef].
  56. Youngblood A., Metlen K.L., and Coe K., 2006. Changes in stand structure and composition after restoration treatments in low elevation dry forests of northeastern Oregon. For. Ecol. Manage. 234: 143–163 [CrossRef].
  57. Youngblood A., Wright C.S., Ottmar R.D., and McIver J.D., 2008. Changes in fuelbed characteristics and resulting fire potentials after fuel reduction treatments in dry forests of the Blue Mountains, northeastern Oregon. For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 3151–3169 [CrossRef].