Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 66, Number 7, October-November 2009
Article Number 706
Number of page(s) 12
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009058
Published online 02 October 2009
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 66 (2009) 706
  1. Anon., 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide Version 6. 4th edition, 2 vol. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina. 1848 p.
  2. Aas G., 1993. Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: a contribution to the hybrid controversy. Ann. Sci. For. 50: 107–113 [CrossRef].
  3. Bacilieri R., Ducousso A.. Petit R., and Kremer, A., 1996. Mating system and assymmetric hybridisation in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evol. 50: 900–908 [CrossRef].
  4. Bacilieri R., Ducousso A., and Kremer A., 1995. Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a mixed stand of Northwest of France. Silvae. Genet. 44: 1–10 [CrossRef].
  5. Bossema I., 1979. Jays and oaks: an eco-ethological study of a symbiosis. Behaviour, 70: 1–117.
  6. Brown A.H.D. and Weir B.S., 1983. Measuring genetic variability in plant populations. Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. In: Tanksley, S. D. and Orton, T. J. (Eds.), Developments in plant genetics and breeding. Part A: 219–239. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam. No. 1. Netherlands.
  7. Burczyk J., DiFazio, S.P., and Adams W.T., 2004. Gene flow in forest trees: How far do genes really travel? For. Genet. 11: 179–192.
  8. Buiteveld J., Bakker, E.G. Bovenschen J., and de Vries, S.M.G., 2001. Paternity analysis in a seed orchard of Quercus robur L. and estimation of the amount of background pollination using microsatellite markers. For. Genet. 8: 331–337.
  9. Cliff A.D. and Ord J.K., 1973. Spatial Autocorrelation. Monographs in Spatial and Environmental Systems Analysis, No. 5. London, Pion ltd. 178 p.
  10. Cottrell J.E., Munro R.C., Tabbener H.E., Milner A.D., Forrest G.I., and Lowe A., 2002. Comparisons of fine scale genetic structure within two British oakwoods using microsatellites; impacts of recolonisation dynamics and past management. For. Ecol. Manage. 176: 287–303.
  11. Curtu A., Gailing, O., and Finkeldey R., 2007. Evidence for hybridization and introgression within a species-rich oak (Quercus spp.) community. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 218 [PubMed] [CrossRef] doi:10.1 186/1471-2148-7-218. 15 p.
  12. Degen B., Petit R., and Kremer A., 2001. SGS – Spatial Genetic Software: A computer program for analysis of spatial genetic and phenotypic structures of individuals and populations. J. Hered. 92: 447–448 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  13. Dering A., and Lewandowski A., 2007 Unexpected disproportion observed in species composition between oak mixed stands and their progeny populations Ann. For. Sci. 67: 413–418.
  14. Dow B.D., Ashley M.V., and H.F. Howe., 1995. Isolation and characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:137–141.
  15. Dow B.D. and Ashley M.V., 1996. Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol. Ecol. 5: 615–627 [CrossRef].
  16. Ducousso A., Michaud H., and Lumaret R., 1993. Reproduction and gene flow in the genus Quercus L. Ann. Sci. For. 50 (Suppl.): 91s–106s.
  17. Gram K., Jørgensen, C.A., and Köie M., 1944. De jydske egekrat og deres Flora, Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Biologiske Skrift. Bd. III, Nr. 3. København (in Danish).
  18. Gugerli F., Walser J.-C., Dounavi K., Holderegger, R., and Finkeldey, R., 2007. Coincidence of small-scale spatial discontinuities in leaf morphology and nuclear microsatellite variation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur in a mixed forest. Ann. Bot. 99: 713–722 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  19. Holm S., 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6: 65–70.
  20. Jamieson A., 1994. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Anim. Genet. 25: 37–44 [PubMed].
  21. Jensen J.S., Olrik, D.C., Roulund H., and Lowe, A., 2003. Population genetics and spatial autocorrelation in an unmanaged stand of Quercus petraea in Denmark. Scand. J. For. Res. 18: 295–304 [CrossRef].
  22. Jensen J.S., Wellendorf H., Jager K., De Vries S.M.G., and Jensen, V., 1997. Analysis of a 17-year old Dutch open-pollinated progeny trial with Quercus robur (L.). For. Genet. 4: 139–147.
  23. Jensen J.S., 2000. Breeding of broadleaves in a Nordic perspective. Baltic Forestry 6: 67–77.
  24. Jensen J.S and Hansen J.K., 2008. Geographical variation of phenology of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl and Q. robur L. oak grown in a greenhouse. Scand. J. For. Res. 23:179–188.
  25. Johnson H., 1952. Ungdomsutvecklingen hos stälkeg, druvek och rödek. Svenska Skogvårdsforeningens Tidsskrift 50: 168–192 (in Swedish).
  26. Jump A. and Peñuelas J., 2006. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 8096–8100 [CrossRef].
  27. Kalinowski S.T., 2005. HP-Rare: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic diversity. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5: 187–189 [CrossRef].
  28. Kalinowski S.T., Taper M.L., and Marshall T.C., 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol.16: 1099–1006.
  29. Kleinschmit J. and Kleinschmit J.G.R., 2000. Quercus robur-Quercus petraea: a critical review of the species concept. Glas. sumske Pokuse 37: 441–452.
  30. Kremer A., Zanetto A., and Ducousso A., 1997. Multilocus and multitrait measures of differentiation for gene markers and phenotypic traits. Genetics. 145, 1229–1241.
  31. Kremer A., Dupouey J.L., Deans J.D., Cottrell J., Csaikl U.M., Finkeldey R., Espinel S. Jensen J.S., Kleinschmit J., Van Dam B., Ducousso A., Forrest I., Lopez de Heredia U., Lowe A.J., Tutkova M., Munro R.C., Steinhoff S., and Badeau V., 2002. Morphological variation in mixed oak stands (Quercus robur and Quercus petraea) is stable across western European populations. Ann. For. Sci. 59: 777–787 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  32. Lepais O., Léger V., and Gerber S., 2006. High throughput microsatellite genotyping in oak species. Silvae Genet. 55: 238–240.
  33. Lexer C., Heinze B., Gerber S., Macalka-Kampfer S., Steinkellner H., Kremer A., and Glössl J., 2000. Microsatellite analysis of maternal half-sib families of Quercus robur, pedunculate oak. (II): Inferring the number of pollen donors from the offspring. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 185–191 [CrossRef].
  34. Lowe A., Harris S., and Ashton P., 2004. Ecological Genetics Design, Analysis and Application, Blackwell Publishing, 326 p.
  35. Manly B.F.J., 2006. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in Biology, Chapman and Hall, London. 455p.
  36. Marshall T.C., Slate J., Kruuk L.E.B., and Pemberton J.M., 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639–655 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  37. Mariette S., Cottrell J., Csaikl U.M., Goikoechea P., König, A., Lowe A.J., Van Dam B., Barreneche T., Bodénès C., Streiff R., Burg K., Groppe K., Munro R.C., Tabbener H., and Kremer A., 2002. Comparison of levels of genetic diversity detected with AFLP and microsatellite markers within and among mixed Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. stands. Silvae. Genet. 51: 72–79.
  38. Muir G. and Schlötterer C., 2005. Evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellites loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Mol. Ecol. 14: 549–561 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  39. Nixon K.C., 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann. Sci. For. 50 (Suppl.): 25s–34s.
  40. Olrik D. and Kjær E.D., 2007. The reproductive success of a Q. petraea $\times$ Q. robur F1-hybrid in back-crossing situations. Ann. For. Sci. 64: 37–46 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  41. Parelle J., Brendel O., Jolivet Y., and Dreyer E., 2007. Intra- and interspecific diversity in the response to waterlogging of two co-occurring white oak species (Quercus robur and Quercus petraea). Tree Physiol. 27: 1027–1034 [PubMed].
  42. Petit R.J., Bodénès C., Ducousso A., Roussel G., and Kremer A. 2003. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol. 161: 151–164.
  43. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., and Donnelly P., 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959 [PubMed]
  44. Raymond M. and Rousset F., 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248–249.
  45. Robledo-Arnuncio J.J. and Gil L., 2005. Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94: 13–22 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  46. Rushton B.S., 1978. Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: a multivariate approach to the hybrid problem. 1. Data aquisition, analysis and interpretation. Watsonia 12: 81–101.
  47. Scotti-Saintagne C., Mariette S., Porth I., Goicoechea P., Barraneche T., Bodénès C., Burg, K., and Kremer, A.G., 2004. Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Genetics 168: 1615–1626 [PubMed] [CrossRef]
  48. Sokal R.R. and Wartenberg D.E., 1983. A test of spatial autocorrelation analysis using an isolation-by-distance model. Genet. 105: 219–237.
  49. Siegismund H.R. and Jensen J.S., 2001. Intrapopulation and interpopulation genetic variation of Quercus in Denmark. Scand. J. For. Res. 16: 103–116 [CrossRef].
  50. Steinkellner H., Fluch S., Turetschek E., Lexer C., Streiff R., Kremer A., Burg K., and Glössl J., 1997. Identification and characterization of (GA/CT)$_{\rm n}$_ microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Mol. Ecol. 33: 1093–1096.
  51. Steinhoff S., 1998. Kontrollierte Kreuzungen zwischen Stiel- und Traubeneiche: Ergebnisse und Folgerungen. Allg. Forst- und Jagdz. 169: 163–168.
  52. Streiff R., Labbe T., Bacilieri R., Steinkellner H., Glössl J., and Kremer A., 1998. Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 7: 317–328 [CrossRef].
  53. Streiff R., Ducousso A., Lexer C., Steinkellner H., Glössl J., and Kremer A., 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed stand of Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol. Ecol. 8: 831–841 [CrossRef].
  54. Valbuena-Carabana M., Gonzalez-Martinez S.C., Sork V.L., Collada C., Soto A., Goicoechea P.G., and Gil L., 2005. Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 95: 457–465 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  55. Weir B.S., 1990. Genetic Data Analysis. Sinauer Publ., Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates, 377 p.
  56. Weir B.S. and Cockerham C.C., 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370 [CrossRef].