Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 4, June 2010
Article Number 404
Number of page(s) 9
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009124
Published online 02 April 2010
  • Almquist C., 2009, Alternative strategies for Scots pine breeding in Sweden. Document dated 2009-02-12.
  • Danusevičius D., and Lindgren D., 2002. Comparison of phenotypic, clonal and progeny supported selection in long-term tree breeding. Silvae Genet. 51: 19–26.
  • Danusevičius D., and Lindgren D., 2004. Progeny testing proceeded by phenotypic pre-selection-timing considerations. Silvae Genet. 53: 20–26.
  • Falconer D.S. and Mackay T.F.C., 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, Longman, Essex, UK, 480 p.
  • Hannrup B., Jansson G., and Danell Ö., 2007. Comparing gain and optimum test size from progeny testing and phenotypic selection in Pinus sylvestris. Can. J. For. Res. 37: 1227–1235. [CrossRef]
  • Jansson G., Li B., and Hannrup B., 2003. Time trends in genetic parameters for height and optimal age for parental selection in Scots pine. For. Science 49: 696–705.
  • Kerr R.J., Goddard M.E., and Jarvis S.F., 1998. Maximising genetic response in tree breeding with constraints on group coancestry. Silvae Genet. 47: 165–173.
  • Lambeth C.C., 1980. Juvenile-mature correlation in Pinaceae and implications for early selection. For. Sci. 26: 571–580.
  • Lindgren D., 2005. Unbalances in tree breeding. In: Fedorkov A. (Ed.), Proc. Meeting Nordic Forest Tree Breeders and Forest Geneticists “Status, monitoring and targets for breeding programs”, Syktyvkar, Russia, pp. 45–56.
  • Lindgren D., and Mullin T.J., 1997. Balancing gain and relatedness in selection. Silvae Genet. 46: 124–129.
  • Lindgren D., Wei R.-P., and Lee S., 1997. How to calculate optimum family number when starting a breeding program. For. Sci. 43: 206–212.
  • Lindgren D., Danusevicius D., and Rosvall O., 2008. Balanced forest tree improvement can be enhanced by selecting among many parents but maintaining balance among grandparent. Can. J. For. Res. 38: 2797–2803. [CrossRef]
  • Lstibùrek M., Mullin T., Lindgren D., and Rosvall O., 2004a. Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared to population-wide positive assortative mating. I. Equal distribution of testing effort. TAG 109: 1196–1203.
  • Lstibùrek M., Mullin T., Lindgren D., and Rosvall O., 2004b. Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared to population-wide positive assortative mating. II. Unequal distribution of testing effort. TAG 109: 1169–1177.
  • Rosvall O., 1999. Enhancing gain from long-term forest tree breeding while conserving genetic diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden, 65 p.
  • Rosvall O., Jansson G., Andersson B., Ericsson T., Karlsson B., Sonesson J., and Stener L.-G., 2001. Genetiska vinster i nuvarande och framtida fröplantager och klonblandningar. (Genetic gain from present and future seed orchards and clone mixes) (in Swedish with English summary). SkogForsk Redogörelse Nr. 1, 41 p.
  • Ruotsalainen S., 2002. Managing breeding stock in the initiation of a long-term tree breeding program. Ph.D. thesis, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 875, 95 p.
  • Sanchez L.R., 2000. Balanced vs. slightly unbalanced selection. Heredity 84: 685–691. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Wei R.-P., 1995. Predicting genetic diversity and optimising selection. Ph.D. thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden, 64 p.
  • Wei R.-P., and Lindgren D., 2001. Optimum breeding generation interval considering build-up of relatedness. Can. J. For. Res 31: 722–729. [CrossRef]