Highlight
Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 8, December 2010
Article Number 800
Number of page(s) 7
Section Opinions and Comments
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010052
Published online 29 October 2010
  • Adams W.M., 2006. The future of sustainability: re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century, Report of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31 January 2006, http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf, retrieved on: 2010-06-24.
  • Andersson F., Angelstam P., Feger K.H., Hasenhauer H., Kräuchi N., Marell A., Matteuci G., Schneider U., and Tabbush P., 2005. A research strategy for sustainable forest management in Europe, Groupement d’Intérêt Public Ecosystèmes Forestiers, Paris, 149 p.
  • Aussenac G., 2002. From the “Annales de l’École Nationale des Eaux et Forêts” to the “Annals of Forest Science”, eighty years of forestry science publications in France. Ann. For. Sci. 59: 789–793. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP), 2005. Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, D.C., 332 p.
  • Glück P., 2004. Response to “The role of research in the MCPFE” – Research needs in the pan-European process: the role of EFI. In: Baines C. (Ed.), Forest Research Crossing Borders. EFI Proc. 50: 97–101.
  • Helms J.A., 2002. Forest, forestry, forester. What do these terms mean? J. For. 100: 15–19.
  • Hettelingh J.P., Posch M., and Slootweg J., 2005. Status of European critical loads and dynamic modelling. In: Hettelingh J.P., Posch M., and Slootweg J. (Eds.), CCE Status Report 2005, Coordination Centre for Effects, Bilthoven, Netherlands, pp. 9–26.
  • Hickey G.M. and Nitschke C.R., 2005. Crossing disciplinary boundaries in forest research: an international challenge. For. Chron. 81: 321–323.
  • Houllier F., 2004. How to respond to emerging research needs in Europe? In: Baines C. (Ed.), Forest research crossing borders. EFI Proc. 50: 137–142.
  • Innes J.L., 2005. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and training in forestry and forest research. For. Chron. 81: 324–329.
  • IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, In: Pachauri R.K and Reisinger A. (Eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 p.
  • Jansen G., 2008. Communication between forest scientists and forest policy-makers in Europe – a survey on both sides of the science/policy interface. For. Policy Econ. 10: 183–194. [CrossRef]
  • Kaennel M., 1998. Biodiversity: a diversity in definition. In: Bachmann P., Köhl M., Päivinen R. (Eds.), Assessment of biodiversity for improved forest planning, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 71–81.
  • Konijnendijk C.C., 2004. Enhancing the forest science/policy interface in Europe: urban forestry showing the way. Scand. J. For. Res. 19(Suppl.): 123–128. [CrossRef]
  • Kuhn T.S., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Univ. of Chicago Pr., Chicago, 173 p.
  • Mendoza M.A., Fajardo J.J., and Zepeta J., 2005. Landscape based forest management, a real world case study from Mexico. For. Ecol. Manage. 209: 19–26. [CrossRef]
  • Mulloy F., 2004. Closing address. In: Baines C. (Ed.), Forest Research Crossing Borders. EFI Proc. 50: 149–150.
  • Nobis M. and Wohlgemuth T., 2004. Trend words in ecological core journals over the last 25 years (1978–2002). Oikos 106: 411–421. [CrossRef]
  • Schlaepfer R., 1997. Ecosystem-Based Management of Natural Resources: a Step Towards Sustainable Development. IUFRO Occasional Paper 6: 30.
  • Seppälä R., 2004. How to respond to emerging research needs in Europe: trends affecting forest research and strategies to face them. In: Baines C. (Ed.), Forest Research Crossing Borders. EFI Proc. 50: 147–148.
  • Soutrenon A. and Delatour C., 1998. Vingt ans de traitements de souches à l’urée contre Heterobasidion annosum en France (Base de données du Cemagref). Rev. For. Fr. 50: 217–229. [CrossRef]
  • Ter Braak, C. J. F. and Šmilauer P., 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York.
  • White A. and Hernandez N.R., 1991. Increasing field complexity revealed through article title analyses. J. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. 42: 731–734. [CrossRef]