Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 60, Number 6, September 2003
Page(s) 539 - 547
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003047
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 539-547
  1. Abraitis R., Norell L., Eriksson G., Retrospective studies on nitrogen response of Pinus sylvestris L. open pollinated families, Forest Genet. 5 (1998) 39-45.
  2. Abrams M.D., Genotypic and phenotypic variation as stress adaptations in temperate tree species: a review of several case studies, Tree Physiol. 14 (1994) 833-842.
  3. Adams W.T., Aitken S.N., Joyce D.G., Howe G.T., Vargas-Hernandez J., Evaluating efficacy of early testing for stem growth in coastal Douglas-fir, Silvae Genet. 50 (2001) 93-176.
  4. Apiolaza L.A., Garrick D.J., Burdon R.D., Optimising early selection using longitudinal data, Silvae Genet. 49 (2000) 195-200.
  5. Arndt S.K., Clifford S.C., Wanek W., Jones H.G., Popp M., Physiological and morphological adaptations of the fruit tree Ziziphus rotundifolia in response to progressive drought stress, Tree Physiol. 21 (2001) 705-715  [PUBMED link].
  6. Badalotti A., Anfodillo T., Grace J., Evidence of osmoregulation in Larix decidua at Alpine treeline and comparative responses to water availability of two co-occuring evergreen species, Ann. For. Sci. 57 (2000) 623-633  [EDPS link].
  7. Bentzer B.G., Foster G.S., Hellberg A.R., Podzorski A.C., Trends in genetic and environmental parameters, genetic correlations, and response to indirect selection for 10-year volume in a Norway spruce clonal experiment, Can. J. For. Res. 19 (1989) 897-903.
  8. Bridgwater F.E., Shoot elongation patterns of loblolly pine families selected for contrasting growth potential, For. Sci. 36 (1990) 641-656.
  9. Burdon R.D., Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding, Silvae Genet. 26 (1977) 168-175.
  10. Calamassi R., Della Rocca G., Falusi M., Paolettiinstb E., Strati S., Resistance to water stress in seedlings of eight European provenances of Pinus halepensis Mill., Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 663-672  [EDPS link].
  11. Cannelet MG.R., Bridgwater F.E., Greenwood M.S., Seedling growth rates, water stress responses and root-shoots relationships related to eight year volumes among families of Pinus taeda L., Silvae Genet. 27 (1978) 237-247.
  12. Edwards D.R., Dixon M.A., Mechanisms of drought response in Thuja occidentalis L. II. Post-conditioning water stress and stress relief, Tree Physiol. 15 (1995) 129-133.
  13. Eriksson G., Jonsson A., Dormling I., Norell L., Stener L.G., Retrospective early tests of Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings grown under five nutrient regimes, For. Sci. 39 (1993) 95-117.
  14. Fernandez M., Gil L., Pardos J.A., Response of Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances at early stages to water supply. I. Water relation parameters, Ann. For. Sci. 56 (1999) 179-187.
  15. Fernandez M., Gil L., Pardos J.A., Effects of water supply on gas exchange in Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances during their first growing season, Ann. For. Sci. 57 (2000) 9-16  [EDPS link].
  16. Guyon J.P., Kremer A., Stabilité phénotypique de la croissance en hauteur et cinétique journalière de la presson de sève et de la transpiration chez le pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait.), Can. J. For. Res. 12 (1982) 936-946.
  17. Hopkins E.R., Butcher T.B., Provenance comparisons of Pinus pinaster Ait. in Western Australia, CALMScience 1 (1994) 55-105.
  18. Jansson A., Jonsson A., Eriksson G., Efficiency of early testing in Pinus sylvestris L. grown under two different spacings in growth chamber, Silvae Genet. 47 (1998) 298-306.
  19. Jonsson A., Dormling I., Eriksson G., Norell L., Stener L.G., Retrospective early tests for growth in Pinus sylvestris, For. Tree Improv. 23 (1990) 115-122.
  20. Jonsson A., Dormling I., Eriksson G., Norell L., GCA variance components in 36 Pinus sylvestris L. full-sib families cultivated at five nutrient levels in a growth chamber, For. Sci. 38 (1992) 575-593.
  21. Jonsson A., Eriksson G., Ye Z.H., Yeh F.C., A retrospective early test of Pinus sylvestris seeedlings grown at wide and dense spacing, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 1443-1452  [CROSSREF link].
  22. Karlsson B., Lundkvist K., Eriksson G., Juvenile-mature correlations and selection effects on clone level after stratified family and individual selection of Picea abies (L) Karst seedlings, Silvae Genet. 47 (1998) 208-214.
  23. Kramer P.J., Water relations of plants, Academic Press, New York, 1983.
  24. Kremer A., Component analysis of height growth, compensation between components and seasonal stability of shoot elongation in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.), in: Tigerstedt P.M.A., Puttonen P., Kpski V. (Eds.), Crop physiology of forest trees, Helsinki University Press, Helsinki, 1984, pp. 203-217.
  25. Kremer A., Predictions of age-age correlations of total height based on serial correlations between height increments in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.), Theor. Appl. Genet. 85 1992) 152-158.
  26. Kremer A., Xu L.A., Relationship between first season free growth and later field height growth in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.), Can. J. For. Res. 19 (1989) 690-699.
  27. Kremer A., Lascoux D.M., Nguyen A., Morphogenetic subdivision of height growth and early selection in maritime pine, in: Proc. 2th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Knoxville, Tennessee, 1991, pp. 203-221.
  28. Lambeth C.C., Juvenile-mature correlations in pinaceae and implications for early selection, For. Sci. 26 (1980) 571-580.
  29. Lambeth C.C., Early testing - overview with emphasis on loblolly pine, in: Proc. 17th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Athens, 1983, pp. 297-311.
  30. Lambeth C.C., Stonecypher R.W., Zobel B.J., Early testing of Douglas-fir phytotron environments - the effect of selection trait and genotype-environment interaction, in: Proc. 7th N. Am. For. Biol. Conf., Lexington, 1982, pp. 137-148.
  31. Lascoux D.M., Kremer A., Dormling I., Growth and phenology of 1-year old maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) seedlings under continuous light. Implications for early selection, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1325-1336.
  32. Lascoux D.M., Novitol Paino E., Sierra de Grado R., Kremer A., Dormling I., Maturation of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) seedlings after exposure to a period of continuous light, Tree Physiol. 12 (1993) 363-378.
  33. Lebourgeois F., Lévy G., Aussenac G., Clerc B., Willm F., Influence of soil drying on leaf water potential, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and growth in two black pine varieties, Ann. Sci. For. 55 (1998) 287-299.
  34. Loustau D., Crepeau S., Guye M.G., Sartore M., Saur E., Growth and water relations of three genetically separate origins of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) under saline conditions, Tree Physiol. 15 (1995) 569-576.
  35. Namkoong G., Conkle M.T., Time trends in genetic control of height growth in Ponderosa pine, For. Sci. 22 (1976) 2-12.
  36. Nanson A., Juvenile and correlated trait selection and its effect on selection programs, in: Proc. 2nd meeting of working group on quantitative genetics, IUFRO, Louisiana, 1970, pp. 17-25.
  37. Nguyen A., Lamant A., Variation in growth and osmotic regulation of roots of water-stressed maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) provenances, Tree Physiol. 5 (1989) 123-133.
  38. Nguyen-Queyrens A., Ferhi A., Loustau D., Guehl J.M., Within-ring $\delta^{13}$C spatial variability and interannual variations in wood cellulose of two contrasting provenances of Pinus pinaster, Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1998) 766-773  [CROSSREF link].
  39. Sands R., Clarke A.R.P., Response of radiata pine to salt stress. I. Water relations, osmotic adjustments and salt uptake, Aus. J. Plant Physiol. 4 (1977) 637-646.
  40. Sellin A., Hydraulic and stomatal adjustment of Norway spruce trees to environmental stress, Tree Physiol. 21 (2001) 879-888  [PUBMED link].
  41. Sonesson J., Jansson G., Eriksson G., Retrospective genetic testing of Picea abies under controlled temperature and moisture regimes, Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002) 81-91  [CROSSREF link].
  42. Thomas F.M., Gausling T., Morphological and physiological responses of oak seedlings (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) to moderate drought, Ann. For. Sci. 57 (2000) 325-333  [EDPS link].
  43. Thomas B.R., Macdonald S.E., Dancik B.P., Variance components, heritabilities and gain estimates for growth chamber and field performance of Populus tremuloides: growth parameters, Silvae Genet. 46 (1997) 317-326.
  44. Timbal J., Analyse rétrospective de la croissance radiale et mise en relation avec le bilan hydrique dans un dispositif d'intensité d'éclaircie de pin maritime dans les Landes de gascogne, Ann. For. Sci. 59 (2002) 205-217  [EDPS link].
  45. Tinus R.W., Root growth potential as an indicator of drought stress history, Tree Physiol. 16 (1996) 795-799.
  46. Wakeley P.C., Relation of thirtieth year to earlier dimensions of southern pines. For. Sci. 17 (1971) 200-209.
  47. Waxler M.S., Van Buijtenen J.P., Early genetic evaluation of loblolly pine, Can. J. For. Res. 11 (1981) 351-355.
  48. Wellendorf H., How can the present knowledge of breeding be used for optimization of spruce breeding programs? in: Proc. IUFRO Joint Meet W. P. Norway spruce prov. and Norway spruce breed, Lower Saxony For. Res. Inst., 1979, pp. 256-279.
  49. Williams C.G., Accelerated short-term genetic testing for loblolly pine families, Can. J. For. Res. 18 (1988) 1085-1089.
  50. Wu H.X., Study of early selection in tree breeding. I. Advantage of early selection through increase of selection intensity and reduction of field test size, Silvae Genet. 47 (1998) 146-155.
  51. Wu H.X., Yeh F.C., Dhir N.K., Pharis R.P., Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlation of greenhouse and field performance in Pinus contorta ssp. Latifolia, Silvae Genet. 46 (1997) 170-175.
  52. Zobel D.B., Riley L., Kitzmiller J.H., Sniezko R., Variation in water relations characteristics of terminal shoots of Port-Oxford-cedar (Chamaecyparys lawsoniana) seedlings, Tree Physiol. 21 (2001) 743-749  [PUBMED link].