Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 62, Number 5, July-August 2005
Page(s) 413 - 422
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005037
References of Ann. For. Sci. 62 413-422
  1. Adams W.W., Zarter C.R., Ebbert V., Demming-Adams B., Photoprotective strategies of overwintering evergreens, BioScience 41 (2004) 41-49.
  2. Centritto M., Loreto F., Massacci A., Pietrini F., Villani M.C., Zacchini M., Improved growth and water use efficiency of cherry saplings under reduced light intensity, Ecol. Res. 15 (2000) 385-396 [CrossRef].
  3. Centritto M., Loreto F., Chartzoulakis K., The use of low [CO2] to estimate diffusional and non-diffusional limitations of photosynthetic capacity of salt-stressed olive saplings, Plant Cell Environ. 26 (2003) 585-594 [CrossRef].
  4. Collins J.F., Larney F.J., Morgan M.A., Climate and soil management, in: Keane T., Collins J.F. (Eds.), Climate, Weather and Irish Agriculture, AGMET, Met Éireann, Dublin, 2004, pp. 239-256.
  5. Cornic G., Drought stress and high light effects on leaf photosynthesis, in: Baker N.R., Bowyer J.R. (Eds.), Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis - from molecular mechanisms to the field, BIOS Scientific Publishers Limited, Oxford, 1994, pp. 178-184.
  6. Coutts M.P., Effects of waterlogging on water relations of actively growing and dormant Sitka spruce seedlings, Ann. Bot. 47 (1981) 747-753.
  7. De Lucia E.H., Whitehead D., Clerwater M.J., The relative limitation of photosynthesis by mesophyll conductance in co-occurring species in a temperate rainforest dominated by the conifer Dacrydium cupressinum, Funct. Plant Biol. 30 (2003) 1197-1204 [CrossRef].
  8. Demmig B., Winter K., Kruger A., Czygan F.C., Zeaxanthin and heat dissipation of excess light energy in Nerium oleander exposed to a combination of high light and excess light energy, Plant Physiol. 87 (1988) 17-24.
  9. Epron D., Dreyer E., Brèda M., Photosynthesis of oak trees [Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] during drought under filed conditions: diurnal coarse of net CO2 assimilation and photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, Plant Cell Environ. 15 (1992) 809-820.
  10. Flexas J., Bota J., Loreto F., Cornic G., Sharkey T.D., Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants, Plant Biol. 6 (2004) 269-279 [CrossRef].
  11. Genty B., Briantaus J.M., Baker N.R., The relationship between quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990 (1989) 87-92.
  12. Hale S.E., Light regime beneath Sitka spruce plantations in northern Britain: preliminary results, For. Ecol. Manage. 151 (2001) 61-66.
  13. Hale S.E., The effects of thinning intensity on the below-canopy light environment in a Sitka spruce plantation, For. Ecol. Manage. 179 (2003) 341-349.
  14. Hale S.E., Levy P.E., Gardiner B.A., Trade-offs between seedling growth, thinning and stand stability in Sitka spruce stands: a modelling analysis, For. Ecol. Manage. 187 (2004) 105-115.
  15. Harley P.C., Loreto F., Di Marco G., Sharkey T.D., Theoretical considerations when estimating the mesophyll conductance to CO2 flux by analysis of the response of photosynthesis to CO2, Plant Physiol. 98 (1992) 1429-1443.
  16. Hoff C., Rambal S., An examination of the interaction between climate, soil and leaf area index in Quercus ilex ecosystem, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 153-161 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  17. Lambers H., Poorter H., Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences, Adv. Ecol. Res. 23 (1992) 187-261.
  18. Leverenz J.W., Factors determining the nature of the light dosage response curve in leaves, in: Baker N.R., Bowyer J.R. (Eds.), Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis - from molecular mechanisms to the field, BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd, Oxford, 1994 pp. 239-254.
  19. Li X.-P., Björkman O., Shih C., Grossman A.R., Rosenquest M., Jansson S., Niyogi K.K., A pigment-binding protein essential for regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting, Nature 403 (2000) 391-395 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  20. Lieffers V.J., Messier C., Stadt K.J., Gendron F., Comeau P.G., Predicting and managing light in the understory of boreal forests, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 796-811 [CrossRef].
  21. Keane T., Collins J.F., Climate, weather and Irish agriculture, AGMET, Met Éireann, Dublin, 2004.
  22. Nieuwenhuis M., Wills J., Gardiner J., Sunström E., Keane M., The effect of soil cultivation methods on rooting depth of young Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) trees on wet mineral soils in Ireland, Forestry 76 (2003) 465-477 [CrossRef].
  23. Osborne B., Black K., Lanigan G., Perks M., Clabby G., Survival on the exposed limestone pavement in the Burren: photosynthesis and water relations of three co-occuring plant species, Biology and Environment 103B (2003) 11-125.
  24. Perks M.P., Monaghan S., O'Reilly C., Osborne B.A., Mitchell D.T., Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, performance and survival of freshly lifted and cold stored Douglas fir seedlings, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 225-235 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  25. Powles S.B., Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visable light, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35 (1984) 115-44.
  26. Powles S.B., Osmond C.B., Inhibition of the capacity and efficiency of photosynthesis in bean leaflets illuminated in a CO2-free atmosphere at low oxygen: a possible role for photorespiration, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5 (1978) 619-620.
  27. Pezeshki S.R., Chambers J.L., Stomatal and photosynthetic responses of sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua) to flooding, Can. J. For. Res. 15 (1985) 371-375.
  28. Ritchie G.A., Hinckley T.M., The pressure chamber as an instrument for ecological research, Adv. Ecol. Res. 9 (1975) 165-224.
  29. Sharkey T.D., Estimating the rate of photorespiration in leaves, Physiol. Plant. 73 (1988) 147-152.
  30. Stewart J.D., Zine el Abidine A., Bernier P.Y., Stomatal mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis in black spruce seedlings during multiple cycles of drought, Tree Physiol. 15 (1994) 57-64.
  31. Van Hees A.F.M., Clerkx A.P.P.M., Shading and root-shoot relations in saplings of silver birch, pedunculate oak and beech, For. Ecol. Manage. 176 (2003) 439-448.
  32. Valentini R., Epron D., De Angelis P., Matteucci G., Dreyer E., In situ estimation of net CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply, Plant Cell Environ. 18 (1995) 631-640.
  33. Valladares F., Pearcy R.W., Drought can be more critical in the shade than the sun: a field study of carbon gain and photoinhibition in a Californian shrub during a dry El Nino year, Plant Cell Environ. 25 (2002) 749-759 [CrossRef].
  34. Von Caemmerer S., Modelling C3 photosynthesis, in: von Caemmerer S. (Ed.), Techniques in Plant Sciences No. 2, Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis, CSIRO Publishing, Australia, 2000, pp. 29-70.
  35. Walters R.G., Horton P., Resolution of components of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in barley leaves, Photosynth. Res. 27 (1991) 121-133 [CrossRef].
  36. Wang Y.P., Jarvis P.G., Influence of shoot structure on the photosynthesis of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), Funct. Ecol. 7 (1993) 433-451.