Free access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 63, Number 5, July-August 2006
Page(s) 457 - 467
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006026
Published online 19 July 2006
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 457-467
  1. Aussenac G., Ducrey M., Bioclimatological study of a broadleaved stand (Fagus sylvatica L. et Quercus sessiliflora Salisb.) in the east of France, Ann. Sci. For. 54 (1991) 265-284 (in French with English summary).
  2. Bartelink H.H., Olsthoorn A.F.M., Mixed Forests in Western Europe, In: Olsthoorn A.A. et al., Dutch. Inst. For. Nature Res. (Eds.), Management of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics, Wageningen, 1999, pp. 9-15.
  3. Bonn S., Tree species dynamic in mixed oak-beech forests and expected modifications due to climate change, Allg. Forst- Jagdztg. 171 (2000) 81-88 (in German with English summary).
  4. Bonnemann A., oak-beech mixed stands, Universität Göttingen, Forstwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Habilitationsschrift, Göttingen, 1955 (in German).
  5. Bryndum H., the thinning trial with beech in the totterup forest, Saertyk af det forslige Forsøgsvaesen i. Danmark 38, 1980 (in Danish with English summary).
  6. BW-LFV, Guideline for general forest development types, Ministry for Rural Space, Nutrition, Agriculture and Forestry of Baden-Württemberg, Forest Service of Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, 1999 (in German).
  7. Colin F., Analysis and modeling of branching pattern as linked to wood properties, transfer to the evaluation and improvement of wood resources, Nancy, Université Henri Poincaré Nancy I, Dossier de candidature - Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, 2003 (in French with English summary).
  8. Deleuze C., Pain O., Dhôte J.-F., Hervé J.-C., A flexible radial increment model for individual trees in pure and even-aged stands, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 327-335 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  9. Dhôte J.-F., Modeling of growth of regular beech stands: dynamic of social hierarchy and factors influencing productivity, Ann. Sci. For. 48 (1991) 389-416 (in French with English summary).
  10. Dhôte J.-F., Definition of thinning scenarios for beech and oaks, Rev. For. Fr. (Nancy) XLVII (1995) 106-110 (in French with English summary).
  11. Dhôte J.-F., Effect of thinning on the development of dominant diameter in regular beech or oak stands, Rev. For. Fr. (Nancy) XLIX (1997) 557-578 (in French with English summary).
  12. Dhôte J.-F., Competition between social classes of sessile oak and beech, Rev. For. Fr. (Nancy) LI (1999) 309-325 (in French with English summary).
  13. Dhôte J.-F., Modeling the growth dynamic of stands with the social broadleaves, transfer to silviculture of beech and oaks, Nancy, Université Henri Poincaré Nancy I, Dossier de candidature - Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, 1999 (in French with English summary).
  14. Dhôte J.-F., Hervé J.-C., Changes in productivity in four sessile oak stands since 1930: an approach at stand level, Ann. For. Sci. 57 (2000) 651-680 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef] (in French with English summary).
  15. Dhôte J.-F., Le Moguédec G., Reference of the Fagacées growth simulator, Nancy-Champenoux, 2004 (in French).
  16. Duplat P., Tran-Ha Mien, Modeling dominant height growth of sessile oak (Quercus petraea Liebl) in France - Inter-regional variability and effect of recent growth periods (1959-1993), Ann. For. Sci. 54 (1997) 611-634 (in French with English summary).
  17. Ellenberg H., Vegetation of Middle Europe with the Alps from an Ecological, Dynamic and Historical Perspective, Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1996 (in German).
  18. Fontaine F., Colin F., Jarret P., Druelle J.-J., Evolution of the epicormic potential on 17-year-old Quercus petraea trees: first results, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 583-592 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  19. FR-ONF, Regional Forest Guidelines for the Lorraine Region, Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche, Tomes 1 and 2, Paris, 1998 (in French).
  20. Freist-Dorr M., Structure and Growth of South Western Sessile Oak-Beech Mixed Stands: Presentation Exemplified by Long-Term-Permanent Plots, München, Forstliche Forschungsberichte München, Schriftenreihe der Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität München und der Bayer. Forst- u. Forschungsanstalt, Ph.D. dissertation, 1992 (in German).
  21. González M.S., Tomé M., Montero G., Modelling height and diameter growth of dominant cork oak trees in Spain, Scand. J. For. Res. 8 (2005) 633-643.
  22. Goreaud F., Contributions to the analysis of spatial structure in a temperate forest for the modeling of complex forests, Ph.D. dissertation, Nancy, 2000 (in French with English summary).
  23. Gregoire T.G., Schabenberger O., Barret J.B., Linear Modelling of Irregularly Spaced, Unbalanced, Longitudinal Data from Permanent-Plot Measurements, Can. J. For. Res. 25 (1995) 137-156.
  24. Hasel K., Schwartz E., Forest History, Kessel, Remagen, 2002 (in German).
  25. Henriksen H., Sanojca K., Influence of an understorey of beech on the development of epicormic branches of Quercus robur, Forstlige Forsogsvaesen i Danmark 39 (1983) 94-119 (in Danish with English summary).
  26. IFN-FR, French National Forest Inventory, www.ifn.fr, 2005.
  27. Jahn G., Die Buche auf dem Vormarsch in Flachland des nordwestlichen Mitteleuropa, Forst- u Holzwirt. 38 (1983) 142-143.
  28. Kelty M.J., Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands, In: Kelty M.J., Larson B.C., Oliver C.H.D. (Eds.), The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests, 1992, pp. 125-141.
  29. Kenk G., Silvicultural Program "Valuable Oak", Reflections on a Forest Planning Type, [EM-8-80], Ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft Umwelt und Forsten, Stuttgart, 1979 (in German).
  30. Le Goff N., Ottorini J.M., Effect of thinning on the growth of beech, interactions with climatic factors, Rev. For. Fr. (Nancy) LI-2 (1999) 355-364.
  31. Leuschner C., Forest dynamics on sandy soils in the Lüneburger Heide, Phytooecologia 22 (1994) 289-324 (in German with English summary).
  32. Leuschner C., Mechanisms of competitive superiority of beech, Berichte der Reinhard-Tüxen-Gesellschaft 10 (1998) 5-18 (in German with English summary).
  33. Leuschner C., Hertel D., Coners H., Büttner V., Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis, Oecologia 126 (2001) 276-284 [CrossRef].
  34. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D., SAS System for Mixed Models, NC, USA, 1996.
  35. Lüpke V.B., Silvicultural methods of oak regeneration with special respect to shade tolerant mixed species, For. Ecol. Manage. 106 (1998) 19-26 [CrossRef].
  36. Lüpke V.B., Hauskeller-Bullerjahn K., A contribution to the modelling of young stands exemplified by sessile oak-beech mixed natural regenerations, Allg. Forst- Jagdzgt. 175 (2004) 61-69 (in German with English summary).
  37. Meyer P., Unkrig W., Griese F., Development of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in north-west german forest reserves, Forst Holz 55 (2000) 470-477 (in German with English summary).
  38. Otto H.-J., Driving forces of natural dynamics in European beech forests, Forst Holz 57 (2002) 649-653 (in German with English summary).
  39. Oswald H., Main results from experimental plots with oak from the National Center of Forest Research, Rev. For. Fr. (Nancy) XXXIII, No. spécial (1981) 65-85 (in French with English summary).
  40. Pardé J., Normes on silviculture for sessile oak stands, Rev. For. Fr. (Nancy) XXX (1978) 11-17 (in French with English summary).
  41. Pretzsch H., Conception and Construction of Growth Models for Pure and Mixed Forests, Universität München, Forstliche Forschungsberichte München, Schriftenreihe der Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität München und der Bayerischen Forstlichen Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt, Habilitationsschrift, 1992 (in German with English summary).
  42. Pretzsch H., Pure and Mixed Stands under the Influence of Disturbing Factors: Elasticity and Resilience of Growth, Göttingen, 2004, 382-395, Deutscher Forstverein e.V., 61. Jahrestagung, Forstwirtschaft im Dialog - Gemeinsam die Zukunft gestalten!, 25-28 September 2003 in Mainz (in German).
  43. Pretzsch H., A re-evaluation of Reineke's rule and stand density index, For. Sci. (2006) (in press).
  44. Pretzsch H., Yoda's 3/2 power law of self-thinning, a stimulating myth, Oecologia (2006) (in press).
  45. Preuhsler T., Stögbauer K., Structural traits of the veneer oak stand "Eichhall" in the Bavarian forest district of Rohrbrunn, Forst Holz 45 (1990) 283-289 (in German with English summary).
  46. Prodan M., Forest Measurement, J.D. Sauerländer's Verlag, Frankfurt a. M., 1965 (in German).
  47. Puettmann K.J., Hibbs D.E., Hann D.W., The dynamics of mixed stands of Alnus rubra and Pseudotsuga menziesii: extension of size-density analysis to species mixture, J. Ecol. 80 (1992) 449-458.
  48. Raftoyannis Y., Radoglou K., Physiological responses of beech and sessile oak in a natural mixed stand during dry summer, Ann. Bot. 89 (2002) 723-730 [CrossRef].
  49. Reineke L.H., Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests, J. Agric. Res. 46 (1933) 627-638.
  50. Röhle H., Structure and Growth of Pedunculate Oak Mixed Forests on Ground Water Influenced Site in the Floodplains of Southern Bavaria, Universität München, Forstliche Forschungsberichte München, Schriftenreihe der Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität München und der Bayerischen Forstlichen Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt, Dissertation, 1982 (in German with English summary).
  51. SAS9.12004, SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide, SAS Publishing, Cary.
  52. Schraml C., Rennenberg H., Sensitivity of different ecotypes of beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) to drought stress, Forstwiss. Cent.bl. 119 (2000) 51-61 (in German with English summary).
  53. Schwinning S., Weiner J., Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants, Oecologia 113 (1998) 447-455 [CrossRef].
  54. Söderberg U., Functions for Forecasting Timber Yield: Increment and Form Height of Individual Trees of Native Tree Species in Sweden, Rapport, Avdelnigen för Skogsuppskattning och Skogsindelning 14, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Umeå, 1986 (in Swedish with English summary).
  55. Spiecker H., On the Growth Control and Natural Pruning of Sessile and Pedunculate Oak (Quercus petrea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L.), Schr. reihe Landesforstverwalt, Baden-Württ., Stuttgart, 1991 (original in German).
  56. Thomasius H., Stability, elasticity and resilience of forest ecosystems under the influence of acid depositions, Forstarchiv 58 (1987) 232-239 (in German with English summary).
  57. Thomasius H., Stability of natural and artificial forest ecosystems and their interference by forest measures, Allg. Forst-Jagdztg 39 (1988) 1064-1068 (in German with English summary).
  58. Thomasius H., Stability of natural and artificial forest ecosystems and their interference by forest measures, Allg. Forst-Jagdztg 38 (1988) 1037-1043 (in German with English summary).
  59. Tufte E.R., The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 2001.
  60. Vanclay J.K., Skovsgaard J.P., Evaluating forest growth models, Ecol. Model. 98 (1997) 1-12 [CrossRef].
  61. Wichmann L., Modelling the Effects of Competition Between Individual Trees in Forest Stands, 112, Copenhagen, Denmark, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 2002.
  62. Wykoff W.R., A basal area increment model for individual conifers in the northern Rocky Mountains, For. Sci. 36 (1990) 1077-1104.
  63. Wykoff W.R., Crookston N.L., Stage A.R., User's Guide to the Stand Prognosis Model, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep, INT-133, Ogden, Utah, 1982.
  64. Yang Y., Monserud R.A., Huang S., An evaluation of diagnostic tests and their roles in validating forest biometric models, Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004) 619-629 [CrossRef].