Free access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 66, Number 3, April-May 2009
Article Number 306
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 07 April 2009
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 66 (2009) 306
  1. Bader P., Jansson S., and Jonsson B.G., 1995. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biol. Conserv. 72: 355–362 [CrossRef].
  2. Barbaro L., Pontcharraud L., Vétillard F., Guyon D., and Jactel H., 2005. Comparative responses of birds, carabid, and spider assemblages to stand and landscape diversity in Maritime pine plantation forests. Ecoscience 12: 110–121 [CrossRef].
  3. Bouget C., Brustel H., and Zagatti P., 2008. The French information system on saproxylic beetle ecology (FRISBEE): an ecological and taxonomical database to help with the assessment of forest conservation status. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) Suppl. 10: 33–36.
  4. Brin A., Meredieu C., Piou D., Brustel H., and Jactel H., 2008. Changes in quantitative patterns of dead wood in Maritime pine plantations over time. For. Ecol. Manage. 256: 913–921 [CrossRef].
  5. Buse J., Ranius T., and Assmann T., 2008. An endangered longhorn beetle associated with old oaks and its possible role as an ecosystem engineer. Conserv. Biol. 22: 329–337 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  6. Bütler R., Angelstam P., Ekelund P., and Schlaeffer R., 2004. Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and sub-Alpine forest. Biol. Conserv. 119: 305–318 [CrossRef].
  7. De Vries P.G., 1973. A general theory on line intersect sampling with application to logging residue inventory. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool, 73–11, Wageningen,The Netherlands.
  8. Duelli P. and Obrist M.K., 2003. Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 87–98 [CrossRef].
  9. EEA, 2007. Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: proposal for a first set of indicators to monitor progress in Europe. Rep. No. 11/2007, Copenhagen, 186 p.
  10. Ekblad A., Boström B., Holm A., and Comstedt D., 2005. Forest soil respiration rate and d 13C is regulated by recent above ground weather conditions Oecologia 143: 136–142.
  11. Elton C.S., 1966. Dying and dead wood. In: Elton C.S. (Ed.), The Pattern of Animal Communities, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 279–305.
  12. Failing L. and Gregory R., 2003. Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. J. Environ. Manag.68: 121–132.
  13. Franc N., Gotmark F., Økland B., Norden B., and Paltto H., 2007. Factors and scales potentially important for saproxylic beetles in temperate mixed oak forest. Biol. Conserv. 135: 86–98 [CrossRef].
  14. Grove S.J., 2002. Tree basal area and dead wood as surrogate indicators of saproxylic insect fauna integrity: a case study from the Australian lowland tropics. Ecol. Indic. 1: 171–188 [CrossRef].
  15. Hansson L., 2001. Indicators of biodiversity: recent approaches and some general suggestions. Ecol. Bull. 50: 223–229.
  16. Humphrey J.W., Davey S., Peace A.J., Ferris R., and Harding K., 2002. Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. Biol. Conserv. 107: 165–180 [CrossRef].
  17. Jacobs J.M., Spence J.R., and Langor D.W., 2007. Influence of boreal forest succession and dead wood qualities on saproxylic beetles. Agric. For. Entomol. 9: 3–16 [CrossRef].
  18. Johansson M.E. and Nilsson C., 2002. Responses of riparian plants to flooding in free-flowing and regulated boreal rivers: an experimental study J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 971–986 [CrossRef].
  19. Jonsell M., Weslien J., and Ehnstrom B., 1998. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodivers. Conserv. 7: 749–764 [CrossRef].
  20. Jonsson B.G., Kruys N., and Ranius T., 2005. Ecology of species living on dead wood – Lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fenn. 39: 289–309.
  21. Larsson T.-B., Angelstam P., Balent G., Barbati A., Bijlsma R.-J., Boncina A., Bradshaw R., Bücking W., Ciancio O., Corona P., Diaci J., Dias S., Ellenberg H., Fernandes F.M., Fernandez-Gonzalez F., Ferris R., Frank G., Møller P.F., Giller P.S., Gustafsson L., Halbritter K., Hall S., Hansson L., Innes J., Jactel H., Keannel Dobbertin M., Klein M., Marchetti M., Mohren F., Niemelä P., O'Halloran J., Rametsteiner E., Rego F., Scheidegger C., Scotti R., Sjöberg K., Spanos I., Spanos K., Standovár T., Svensson L., Åge Tømmerå B., Trakolis D., Uuttera J., VanDenMeersschaut D., Vandekerkhove K., Walsh P.M., and Watt A.D., 2001. Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests. Ecol. Bull. 50: 127–139.
  22. Lindenmayer D.B., Margules C.R., and Botkin D.B., 2000. Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv. Biol. 14: 941–950 [CrossRef].
  23. MacArthur R.H. and Wilson E.O., 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, 203 p.
  24. Mac Nally R., 2000. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between and reconciliation of “predictive” and “explanatory” models. Biodivers. Conserv. 9: 655–671 [CrossRef].
  25. Mac Nally R., Parkinson A., Horrocks G., Conole L., and Tzaros C., 2001. Relationships between terrestrial vertebrate diversity, abundance and availability of coarse woody debris on south-eastern Australian floodplains. Biol. Conserv. 99: 191–205 [CrossRef].
  26. Marshall P.L., Davis G., and LeMay V.M., 2000. Using line intersect sampling for coarse woody debris. Rep. TR-003, Forest Service, British Columbia, Vancouver Forest Region, 34 p.
  27. Martikainen P., Siitonen J., Punttila P., Kaila L., and Rauh J., 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 94: 199–209 [CrossRef].
  28. McGeoch M.A., Schroeder M., Ekbom B., and Larsson S., 2007. Saproxylic beetle diversity in a managed boreal forest: importance of stand characteristics and forestry conservation measures. Divers. Distrib. 13: 418–429 [CrossRef].
  29. MCPFE, 2003. Improved Pan-European indicators for sustainable forest management. Rep. MCPFE Liaison Unit Vienna, Vienna, 6 p.
  30. Mevik B.H. and Cederkvist H.R., 2004. Mean squared error of prediction (MSEP) estimates for principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR). J. Chemometr. 18: 422–429 [CrossRef].
  31. Mevik B.H. and Wehrens R., 2007. The pls package: principal component and partial least squares regression in R. J. Stat. Soft. 18: 1–24.
  32. Nilsson S.G. and Baranowski R., 1997. Habitat predictability and the occurence of wood beetles in old-growth beech forests. Ecography 20: 491–498 [CrossRef].
  33. Nilsson S.G., Hedin J., and Niklasson M., 2001. Biodiversity and its assessment in boreal and nemoral forests. Scand. J. Forest. Res. 3: 10–26 [CrossRef].
  34. Norden B. and Appelqvist T., 2001. Conceptual problems of ecological continuity and its bioindicators. Biodivers. Conserv. 10: 779–791 [CrossRef].
  35. Noss R., 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4: 355–364 [CrossRef].
  36. Noss R., 1999. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested framework and indicators. For. Ecol. Manage. 115: 135–146 [CrossRef].
  37. Økland B., Bakke A., Hagvar S., and Kvamme T., 1996. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodivers. Conserv. 5: 75–100 [CrossRef].
  38. Pentillä R., Siitonen J., and Kuusinen M., 2004. Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biol. Conserv. 117: 271–283 [CrossRef].
  39. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
  40. Ranius T., 2002. Osmoderma eremita as an indicator of species richness of beetles in tree hollows. Biodivers. Conserv. 11: 931–941 [CrossRef].
  41. Ranius T. and Jonsson M., 2007. Theoretical expectations for thresholds in the relationship between number of wood-living species and amount of coarse woody debris: A study case in spruce forests. J. Nat. Conserv. 15: 120–130 [CrossRef].
  42. Sætersdal M., Gjerde I., and Blom H.H., 2005. Indicator species and the problem of spatial inconsistency in nestedness patterns. Biol. Conserv. 122: 305–316 [CrossRef].
  43. Sarthou J.-P., Ouin A., Arrignon F., Barreau G., and Bouyjou B., 2005. Landscape parameters explain the distribution and abundance of Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera : Syrphidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 102: 539–545.
  44. Schlaepfer R. and Bütler R., 2004. Critères et indicateurs de la gestion des ressources forestières : prise en compte de la complexité et de l'approche écosystémique. Rev. For. Fr. LVI: 431–444.
  45. Schmidtlein S. and Sassin J., 2004. Mapping of continuous floristic gradients in grasslands using hyperspectral imagery. Remote. Sens. Environ. 92: 126–138 [CrossRef].
  46. Schuck A., Meyer P., Menke N., Lier M., and Lindner M., 2004. Forest biodiversity indicator: dead wood – a proposed approach towards operationalising the MCPFE indicator. In: Marchetti M. (Ed.), Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe – from ideas to operationality, EFI Proceedings, pp. 49–77.
  47. Siitonen J., 1994. Decaying wood and saproxylic Coleoptera in two old spruce forests: a comparison based on two sampling methods. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31: 89–95.
  48. Siitonen J., 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms : Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 49: 11–41.
  49. Siitonen J., Martikainen P., Punttilä P., and Rauh J., 2000. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. For. Ecol. Manage. 128: 211–225 [CrossRef].
  50. Similä M., Kouki J., and Martikainen P., 2003. Saproxylic beetles in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: quality of dead wood matters. For. Ecol. Manage.174: 365–381.
  51. Similä M., Kouki J., Monkkonen M., Sippola A.L., and Huhta E., 2006. Co-variation and indicators, of species diversity: Can richness of forest-dwelling species be predicted in northern boreal forests? Ecol. Indic. 6: 686–700 [CrossRef].
  52. Sippola A.L., Siitonen J., and Punttila P., 2002. Beetle diversity in timberline forests: a comparison between old-growth and regeneration areas in Finnish Lapland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 39: 69–86.
  53. Smith G.F., Gittings T., Wilson M., French L., Oxbrough A., O'Donoghue S., O'Halloran J., Kelly D.L., Mitchell F.J.G., Kelly T., Iremonger S., McKee A.-M., and Giller P., 2008. Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand-level management of plantation forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 991–1015 [CrossRef].
  54. Stokland J.N., Tomter S.M., and Söderber U., 2004. Development of Dead Wood Indicators for Biodiversity Monitoring: Experiences from Scandinavia. In: Marchetti M. (Ed.), Monitoring and Indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe – from ideas to operationality, EFI Proceedings, 207–226.
  55. Stokland J.N. and Meyke E., 2008. The saproxylic database: an emerging overview of the biological diversity in dead wood. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) Suppl. 10 : 37–48.
  56. Tenenhaus M., 1998. La régression PLS. Théorie et pratique, Editions Technip, Paris, 254 p.
  57. Van Halder I., Barbaro L., Corcket E., and Jactel H., 2008. Importance of semi-natural habitats for the conservation of butterfly communities in landscapes dominated by pine plantations. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 1149–1169 [CrossRef].
  58. Vancolen S., 2004. La régression PLS. Université de Neuchâtel, Suisse, 28 p.
  59. Wehrens R. and Mevik B.H., 2007. The pls package: partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR).
  60. Winter S. and Möller G.C., 2008. Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation. For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 1251–1261 [CrossRef].