Free Access

Table III

Comparison of the ability of 11 published models, linking total chlorophyll content (units are given for each model; Y) to Spad units (X), to predict our 13 neotropical trees data set. Relative performance of models was assessed using Root Mean Square Error of Prediction (RMSEP).

Species Reference Model Unit RMSEP
Betula papyrifera Marsh. Richardson et al. (2002) Y = 5,52E – 04 + 4.04E – 04 * X + 1.25E – 05 * X2 mg cm−2 14.67
Betula pendula Roth Uddling et al. (2007) Y = 0.0641 * exp(0.0467X) g m−2 35.93
Eucalyptus globules Labill. Pinkard et al. (2006) Y = exp(–8.79 + 2.08 * ln(X)) μg mm−2 15.38
Eucalyptus nitens (H. Deane & Maiden) Maiden Pinkard et al. (2006) Y = exp(–8.55 + 0.97 * ln(X)) μg mm−2 17.74
Mangifera indica L. Schaper and Chacko (1991) Y = –5.4 + 11.1 * X mg m−2 17.08
Malus domestica Borkh Campbell et al. (1990) Y = –83 + 2.37 * X μg cm−2 47.86
Oriza sativa L. Monje and Bugbee (1992) Y = 1.034 + 0.308 * X + 0.11 * X2 mg m−2 30.31
Solanum tuberosum L. Uddling et al. (2007) Y = 0.0913 * exp(0.0415 * X) g m−2 33.60
Triticum aestivum L. Uddling et al. (2007) Y = 0.0599 * exp(0.0493 * X) g m−2 46.18
Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Murillo-Amador et al. (2004) Y = –2.79 + 0.88 * X μg cm−2 24.98
6 neotropical trees Marenco et al. (2009) Y = 0.53 * exp(0.0364 * X) mg m−2 24.21
13 neotropical trees Present study Y = 117.1 * X/(148.84 – X) μg cm−2 11.59