EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 7 (October-November 2003) Ann. For. Sci., 60 7 (2003) 593-600 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 60, Number 7, October-November 2003
Technical, Environmental and Economic challenges of Forest Vegetation Management
Page(s) 593 - 600
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003051
References of Ann. For. Sci. 60 593-600
  1. Backes K., Leuschner C., Leaf water relations of competitive Fagus sylvatica and Quercus petraea trees during 4 years differing in soil drought, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 335-346 [CrossRef].
  2. Balandier P., Pauwels D., La lumière, outil sylvicole pour favoriser la diversité végétale ou la gestion cynégétique des peuplements de mélèze (Larix sp.), Forêt Wallone 61 (2002) 9-13.
  3. Casper B.B., Jackson R.B., Plant competition underground, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 (1997) 545-570 [CrossRef].
  4. Carter G.A., Miller J.H., Davis D.E., Patterson R.M., Effect of vegetative competition on the moisture and nutrient status of loblolly pine, Can. J. For. Res. 14 (1983) 1-9.
  5. Cochard H., Lemoine D., Dreyer E., The effects of acclimation to sunlight on the xylem vulnerability to embolism in Fagus sylvatica L., Plant Cell Environ. 22 (1999) 101-108 [CrossRef].
  6. Cochard H., Coll L., Le Roux X., Améglio T., Unraveling the effects of plant hydraulics on stomatal closure during water stress in walnut, Plant Physiol. 128 (2002) 282-290 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  7. Cole E.C., Newton M., Fifth-year responses of Douglas-fir to crowding and nonconiferous competition, Can. J. For. Res. 17 (1987) 181-186.
  8. Collet C., Frochot H., Guehl J.M., Growth dynamics and water uptake of two forest grasses differing in their growth strategy and potentially competing with forest seedlings, Can. J. Bot. 74 (1996) 1555-1561.
  9. Collet C., Lanter O., Pardos M., Effects of canopy opening on height and diameter growth in naturally regenerated beech seedlings, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 127-134 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  10. Curt T., Prévosto B., Root biomass and rooting profile of naturally regenerated beech in mid-elevation Scots pine woodlands, Plant Ecol. 167 (2003) 269-282 [CrossRef].
  11. Curt T., Prévosto B., Klescewski M., Lepart J., Post-grazing Scots pine colonization of mid-elevation heathlands: population structure, impact on vegetation composition and diversity, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 711-724.
  12. Davies R.J., Trees and weeds. Weed control for successful tree establishment, in: Forestry commission-Handbook, HMSO Publications, London, 1987, pp. 2-36.
  13. Davies M.A., Wrage K.J., Reich P.B., Tjoelker M.G., Schaeffer T., Muermann C., Survival, growth, and photosynthesis of tree seedlings competing with herbaceous vegetation along a water-light-nitrogen gradient, Plant Ecol. 145 (1999) 341-350 [CrossRef].
  14. Frochot H., Picard J.F., Dreyfus P., La végétation herbacée obstacle aux plantations, Rev. For. Fr. 37 (1986) 271-279.
  15. Gemmel P., Nilsson U., Welander T., Development of oak and beech seedlings planted under varying shelterwood densities and with different site preparation methods in southern Sweden, New For. 12 (1996) 141-161.
  16. Harmer R., Robertson M., Seedling root growth of six broadleaved tree species grown in competition with grass under irrigated nursery conditions, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 601-608.
  17. Jackson R.B., Canadell J., Ehleringer J.R., Mooney H.A., Sala O.E., Schulze E.D., A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes, Oecologia 108 (1996) 389-411.
  18. Kolb T.E., Steiner K.C., Growth and biomass partitioning of northern red oak and yellow poplar seedlings: effect of shading and grass root competition, For. Sci. 36 (1990) 34-44.
  19. Lopez B., Sabaté S., Gracia C., An inflatable minirhizotron system for stony soils, Plant Soil 179 (1996) 255-260.
  20. Madsen P., Larsen J.B., Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content, For. Ecol. Manage. 97 (1997) 95-105.
  21. Morris L.A., Moss S.A., Garbett W.S., Competitive interference between selected herbaceous and woody plants and Pinus taeda L. during two growing seasons following planting, For. Sci. 39 (1993) 166-187.
  22. Nambiar E.K.S., Sands R., Competition for water and nutrients in forests, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1955-1968.
  23. Oswald H., Conditions de germination des faînes, de survie et de croissance des semis, in: Teissieur du Cros E. (Ed.), Le hêtre, INRA, Paris, 1981, pp. 221-239.
  24. Prévosto B., Curt T., Gueugnot J., Coquillard P., Modeling mid-elevation Scots pine growth on a volcanic substrate, For. Ecol. Manage. 131 (2000) 223-237.
  25. Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D., Hemmingsen E.A., Sap pressure in vascular plants, Science 148 (1965) 339-346.
  26. Shoji S., Nanzyo M., Dahlgren R., Volcanic ash soils, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993.
  27. Turner N.C., Long M.J., Errors arising from rapid water loss in the measurement of leaf water potential by the pressure chamber technique, Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 7 (1980) 527-537.
  28. Van Hess A.F.M., Growth and morphology of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings in relation to shading and drought, Ann. Sci. For. 54 (1997) 9-18.
  29. Welander T., Ottosson B., The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L., For. Ecol. Manage. 107 (1998) 117-126.