Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 60, Number 7, October-November 2003
Technical, Environmental and Economic challenges of Forest Vegetation Management
Page(s) 701 - 709
References of Ann. For. Sci. 60 701-709
  1. Abrams M.D., Kubiske M.E., Leaf structural characteristics of 31 hardwood and conifer tree species in central Wisconsin: influence of light regime and shade-tolerance rank, For. Ecol. Manage. 31 (1990) 245-253.
  2. Adamska I., ELIPs - light-induced stress proteins, Physiol. Plant. 100 (1997) 794-805 [CrossRef].
  3. Aranda I., Bergasa L.F., Gil L., Pardos J.A., Effects of relative irradiance on the leaf structure of Fagus sylvatica L. seedlings planted in the understory of a Pinus sylvestris L. stand after thinning, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 673-680 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  4. Aussenac G., Interaction between forest stands and microclimate: ecophysiological aspects and consequences for silviculture, Ann. For. Sci. 57 (2000) 287-301 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  5. Aussenac G., Ducrey M., étude bioclimatique d'une futaie feuillue (Fagus sylvatica L. et Quercus sessiliflora Salisb.) de l'Est de la France. 1. Analyse des profils microclimatiques et des caractéristiques anatomiques et morphologiques de l'appareil foliaire, Ann. Sci. For. 34 (1977) 265-284.
  6. Baize D., Girard M.C., A sound reference base for soils, The "referential pedologique" (in English), INRA, Paris, 1998.
  7. Bigorre F., Tessier D., Gras F., Granier A., étude des propiétés hydriques des sols et de leur rôle dans le bilan hydrique. Application à des sols situés sur le Dogger Lorrain en forêt de Haye, Rapport Interne Agence de l'eau Rhin-Meuse/CNRS, 1996.
  8. Bazzaz F.A., Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  9. Bazzaz F.A., Carlson R.W., Photosynthetic acclimation to variability in the light environment in early and late successional plants, Oecologia 54 (1982) 313-316.
  10. Borghetti M., Leonardi S., Raschi A., Synderman D., Tognetti R., Ecotypic variation of xylem embolism, phenological traits, growth parameters and allozyme characteristics in Fagus sylvatica, Funct. Ecol. 7 (1993) 713-720.
  11. Brooks J.R., Sprugel D.G., Hinckley T.M., The effects of light acclimation during and after foliage expansion on photosynthesis of Abies amabilis foliage within the canopy, Oecologia 107 (1996) 21-32.
  12. Causton D.R., Dale M.P., The monomolecular and rectangular hyperbola as empirical models of the response of photosynthetic rate to photon flux density, with applications to three Veronica species, Ann. Bot. 65 (1990) 389-394.
  13. Coll L., Balandier P., Picon-Cochard C., Prévosto B., Curt T., Competition for water between beech seedlings and surrounding vegetation in different light and vegetation composition conditions, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 593-600.
  14. Collet C., Lanter O., Pardos M., Effects of canopy opening on height and diameter growth in naturally regenerated beech seedlings, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 127-134 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  15. Collet C., Lanter O., Pardos M., Effects of canopy opening on the morphology and anatomy of naturally regenerated beech seedlings, Trees 16 (2002) 291-298 [CrossRef].
  16. Coutts M.P., Developmental processes in tree root systems, Can. J. For. Res. 17 (1987) 761-767.
  17. Cochard H., Lemoine D., Dreyer E., The effects of acclimation to sunlight on the xylem vulnerability to embolism in Fagus sylvatica L., Plant Cell Environ. 22 (1999) 101-108 [CrossRef].
  18. Demmig-Adams B., Adams W.W., Grace S.C., Physiology of light tolerance in plants, Hortic. Rev. 18 (1997) 215-246.
  19. Donnelly D.J., Vidaver W.E., Pigment content and gas exchange of red raspberry in vitro and ex vitro, J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 109 (1984) 177-181.
  20. Donnelly D.J., Vidaver W.E., Colbow K., Fixation of 14CO2 in tissue-cultured red raspberry prior to and after transfer to soil, Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 3 (1984) 313-317.
  21. Emborg J., Understorey light conditions and regeneration with respect to the structural dynamics of a near-natural deciduous forest in Denmark, For. Ecol. Manage. 106 (1998) 83-95.
  22. Farquhar G.D., Richards R.A., Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11 (1984) 539-552.
  23. Farquhar G.D., Ehleringer J.R., Hubick K.T., Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40 (1989) 503-537 [CrossRef].
  24. Frochot H., Ningre F., Wehrlen L., Bernier F., Pitsch M., Garnier B., Dispositif en foret de Haye: interaction eclairement et vigueur, INRA, Nancy, 1999.
  25. Gansert D., Sprick W., Storage and mobilization of non-structural carbohydrates and biomass development of beech seedlings (Fagus sylvatica L.) under different light regimes, Trees 12 (1998) 247-257 [CrossRef].
  26. Gillies S.L., Vidaver W., Resistance to photodamage in evergreen conifers, Physiol. Plant. 80 (1990) 148-153 [CrossRef].
  27. Gnojek A.R., Changes in chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content in suppressed Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] in response to release cutting, Trees 6 (1992) 41-47.
  28. Haunte P., Rincon E., Responses to light changes in tropical deciduous woody seedlings with contrasting growth rates, Oecologia 113 (1998) 53-66.
  29. Hough A.F., Silvicultural characteristics of eastern hemlock, USDA Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experiment Station Paper No. 132, Upper Darby, Pa.
  30. Johnson J.D., Tognetti R., Michelozzi M., Pinzauti S., Minotta G., Borghetti M., Ecophysiological responses of Fagus sylvatica seedlings to changing light conditions. II. The interaction of light environment and soil fertility on seedling physiology, Physiol. Plant 101 (1997) 124-134 [CrossRef].
  31. Karakatsoulis J., Kimmins J.P., Bigley R.E., Comparison of the effects of chemical (glyphosate) and manual conifer release on conifer seedling physiology and growth on Vedder Mountain, British Columbia, in: Reynolds P.E. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Carnation Creek Herbicide Workshop, FRDA Report 063, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C., 1989, pp. 168-188.
  32. Kneeshaw D.D., Williams H., Nikinmaa E., Messier C., Patterns of above- and below-ground response of understory conifer release 6 years after partial cutting, Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002) 255-265 [CrossRef].
  33. Larcher W., Physiological Plant Ecology, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980.
  34. Leiffers V.J., Mugasha A.G., MacDonald S.E., Ecophysiology of shade needles of Picea glauca saplings in relation to removal of competing hardwoods and degree of prior shading, Tree Physiol. 12 (1993) 271-280 [PubMed].
  35. Leverenz J.W., Photosynthesis and transpiration in large forest-grown Douglas-fir: diurnal variation, Can. J. Bot. 59 (1981) 349-356.
  36. Lopushinsky W., Stomatal control in conifer seedlings in response to leaf moisture status, Bot. Gaz. 134 (1969) 258-263 [CrossRef].
  37. Madsen P., Growth and survival of Fagus sylvatica seedlings in relation to light intensity and soil water content, Scand. J. For. Res. 9 (1994) 316-322.
  38. Madsen P., Larsen J.B., Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content, For. Ecol. Manage. 97 (1997) 95-105.
  39. Mohammed G.H., Parker W.C., Photosynthetic acclimation in eastern hemlock [Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.] seedlings following transfer of shade-grown seedlings to high light, Trees 13 (1999) 117-124 [CrossRef].
  40. Nambiar E.K.S., Sands R., Competition for water and nutrients in forests. Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1955-1968.
  41. Ningre F., Frochot H., La Fourchaison de hêtre, état des recherches en cours vers une explication et vers la définition de stratégies sylvicoles dans la conduite des peuplements, Actes du forum de la Région Lorraine, ONF Nancy, 19 décembre 1995, pp. 103-112.
  42. Pearcy R.W., Sims D.A., Photosynthetic acclimation to changing light environments: scaling from the leaf to the whole plant, in: Caldwell M.M., Pearcy R.W. (Eds.), Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants, Academic Press, San Diego, 1994, pp. 145-174.
  43. Powers R.F., Ferrell G.T., Moisture, nutrient, and insect constraints on plantation growth: the "Garden of Eden" study, N.Z. J. For. Sci. 26 (1996) 126-144.
  44. Powers R.F., Reynolds P.E., Ten-year responses of ponderosa pine plantations to repeated vegetation and nutrient control along an environmental gradient, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 1027-1038 [CrossRef].
  45. Reynolds P.E., Powers R.F., Gas exchange for managed ponderosa pine stands positioned along a climatic gradient, J. Sust. For. 10 (2000) 257-265.
  46. Reynolds P.E., Bell F.W., Simpson J.A., Lautenschlager R.A., Gordon A.M., Gresch D.A., Buckley D.A., Alternative conifer release treatments affect competition levels, available light, net assimilation rates, and growth of white spruce seedlings, J. Sust. For. 10 (2000) 277-286.
  47. Smith M.A.L., Palta J.P., McCown B.H., Comparative anatomy and physiology of microcultured, seedling, and greenhouse-grown Asian white birch, J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 111 (1986) 437-442.
  48. Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G., Statistical Methods, The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1967.
  49. Tognetti R., Johnson J.D., Michelozzi M., Ecophysiological responses of Fagus sylvatica seedlings to changing light conditions. I. Interactions between photosynthetic acclimation and photoinhibition during simulated canopy gap formation, Physiol. Plant 101 (1997) 115-123 [CrossRef].
  50. Tognetti R., Michelozzi M., Borghetti M., Response to light of shade-grown beech seedlings subjected to different watering regimes, Tree Physiol. 14 (1994) 751-758 [PubMed].
  51. Van Hees A.F.M., Growth and morphology of pedunculated oak (Quercus robur L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings in relation to shading and drought, Ann. Sci. For. 54 (1997) 9-18.
  52. Watt A.S., On the ecology of British beechwoods with special reference to their regeneration, Ecology 11 (1923) 1-48.
  53. Welander T., Ottosson B., Influence of photosynthetic photon flux density on growth and transpiration in seedlings of Fagus sylvatica, Tree Physiol. 17 (1997) 133-140 [PubMed].
  54. Welander T., Ottosson B., The influence of shading on growth and morphology in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L., For. Ecol. Manage. 107 (1998) 117-126.
  55. Zhang S., Hennessey T.C., Heinemann R.A., Acclimation of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) foliage to light intensity as related to nitrogen availability, Can. J. For. Res. 27 (1997) 1032-1040 [CrossRef].