EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 61 / No 2 (March 2004) Ann. For. Sci., 61 2 (2004) 163-169 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 61, Number 2, March 2004
Page(s) 163 - 169
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004008
References of Ann. For. Sci. 61 163-169
  1. Acker S.A., Zenner E.K., Emmingham W.H., Structure and yield of two-storied stands on the Willamette National Forest: implications for green-tree retention, Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1998) 749-758 [CrossRef].
  2. Bravo F., Guerra B., Forest structure and diameter growth in maritime pine in a Mediterranean area, in: Gadow Von K., Nagel J., Saborowski J. (Eds.), Continuous Cover Forestry, Kluwer Ac. Pub., 2002, pp. 123-134.
  3. Bravo F., Montero G., Site index estimation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the High Ebro Basin (northern Spain) using soil attributes, Forestry 74 (2001) 395-406.
  4. Bravo F., Montero G., High-grading effects on Scots pine volume and basal area in pure stands in northern Spain, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 11-18 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  5. Cañellas I., Martínez García F., Montero G., Silviculture and dynamics of Pinus sylvestris L. stands in Spain, Investig. Agrar., Sist. Recur. For. 1 (2000) 233-253.
  6. Carey A.B., Curtis R.O., Conservation of bio-diversity: a useful paradigm for forest ecosystem management, Wild. Soc. Bull. 24 (1996) 610-620.
  7. Curtis R.O., The role of extended rotations, in: Kohm K.A., Franklin J.F. (Eds.), Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century. The Science of Ecosystem Management, Island Press, Washington, 1997, pp. 165-170.
  8. DeBell S.S., Curtis R.O., Harrington C.A., Tappeine, J.C., Shaping stand development through silvicultural practices, in: Kohm K.A., Franklin J.F. (Eds.), Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century, The Science of Ecosystem Management, Island Press, Washington, 1997, pp. 141-149.
  9. Eid T., Hoen H.F., Økseter P., Economic consequences of sustainable forest management regimes at non-industrial forest owner level in Norway, For. Pol. Eco. 2 (2001) 213-228.
  10. Eriksson H., Yield of Norway Spruce in Sweden, Dept. of Forest Yield Rap No. 41, 1976.
  11. Finn S.P., Marzluff J.M., Varland D.E., Effects of landscape and local habitat attirbuttes on northern Goshawk site occupancy in Western Washington, For. Sci. 48 (2002) 427-444.
  12. Franklin J.F., Berg D.R., Thornburgh D.A., Tappeiner J.C., Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems rotations, in: Kohm K.A., Franklin J.F. (Eds.), Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century, The Science of Ecosystem Management, Island Press, Washington, 1997, pp. 111-139.
  13. García Abejón J.L., Tablas de producción de densidad variable para Pinus sylvestris L. en el Sistema Ibérico, Com. INIA, Ser.: Recursos Naturales, No. 10, Madrid, 1981, 57 p.
  14. García Abejón J.L., Gómez Loranca J.A., Tablas de producción de densidad variable para Pinus sylvestris L. en el Sistema Central, Com. INIA, Ser.: Recursos Naturales, No. 29, Madrid, 1984.
  15. García Abejón J.L., Tella G., Tablas de producción de densidad variable para Pinus sylvestris L. en el Sistema pirenaico, Com. INIA, Ser.: Recursos Naturales, No. 43, Madrid, 1986.
  16. González-Martínez S.C., Bravo F., Density and population structure of the natural regeneration of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the High Ebro Basin (Northern Spain), Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 277-288 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  17. Halpern C.B., McKenzie D., Disturbance and post-harvest ground conditions in a structural retention experiment, For. Ecol. Manage. 154 (2001) 215-225.
  18. Hansen A.J., Garman S.L., Weigand J.F., Urban D.L., McComb W.C., Raphael M.G., Alternative silvicultural regimes in the Pacific Northwest simulations of ecological and economic effects, Ecol. Appl. 5 (1995) 535-554.
  19. Hazell P., Gustafsson L., Retention of trees at final harvest - evaluation of a conservation technique using epiphytic bryophite and lichen transplants, Biol. Conserv. 90 (1999) 133-142 [CrossRef].
  20. Liu J., Cubbage F.W., Pulliam H.R., Ecological and economic effects of forest landscape structure and rotation length: simulation studies using ECOLECON, Ecol. Econ. 10 (1994) 249-263 [CrossRef].
  21. Montero G., Rojo A., Alía R., Determinación del turno de Pinus sylvestris en el Sistema Central, Montes 29 (1992) 42-48.
  22. Mörling T., Evaluation of annual ring width and ring density development following fertilisation and thinning of Scots pine, Ann. For. Sci. 59 (2002) 29-40 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  23. Öhman K., Creating continuous areas of old forest in long-term forest planning, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 1817-1823 [CrossRef].
  24. Palahi M., Pukkala T., Miina J., Montero G., Individual-tree growth and mortality models for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in north-east Spain, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 1-10 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  25. Persson O.A., A growth simulator for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Sweden, Dept. of Forest Yield-SLU Rap. No. 31, 1992.
  26. Rojo A., Montero G., El pino silvestre en la Sierra de Guadarrama MAPA, Madrid, 1996.
  27. Rose C.R., Muir P.S., Gree-tree retention: Consequences for timber production in forests of the Western Cascades, Oregon, Ecol. Appl. 7 (1997) 209-217.
  28. Tappeiner J.C., Lavemder D., Walstad J., Curtis R.O., DeBell D.S., Silvicultural systems and regeneration methods: current practices and new alternatives, in: Kohm K.A., Franklin J.F. (Eds.), Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century. The Science of Ecosystem Management, Island Press, Washington, 1997, pp. 151-164.
  29. Valkonen S., Effect of retained Scots pine trees on regeneration, growth, form, and yield of forest stands, Investig. Agrar., Sist. Recur. For. 1 (2000) 121-145.
  30. Valkonen S., Ruuska J., Siipilehto J., Effect of retained trees on the development of young Scots pine stands in Southern Finland, For. Ecol. Manage. 166 (2002) 277-243.
  31. Vanha-Majamaa I., Jalonen J., Green tree retention in Fennoscandian forestry, Scand. J. For. Res. Suppl. 3 (2001) 79-90.
  32. Wikström P., Eriksson L.O., Solving the stand management problem under biiodiversity-related considerations, For. Ecol. Manage. 126 (2001) 361-376.
  33. Zenner E.K., Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests? Ecol. Appl. 10 (2000) 800-810.
  34. Zenner E.K., Acker S.A., Emmingham W.H, Growth reduction in harvest-age, coniferous forest with residual trees in the western central Cascade Range of Oregon, For. Ecol. Manage. 102 (1998) 75-88.