Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 61, Number 7, October-November 2004
Page(s) 629 - 641
References of Ann. For. Sci. 61 629-641
  1. Aussenac G., La maîtrise du microclimat en plantation, Rev. For. Fr. 38 (1986) 285-292.
  2. Aussenac G., Granier A., Naud R., Éclaircie systématique dans un jeune peuplement de Douglas : modifications microclimatiques et influences sur la croissance, Rev. For. Fr. 36 (1984) 279-288.
  3. Bailly A., Éclaircir les peuplements résineux : un impératif écologique, AFOCEL-ARMEF, Informations-Forêt 4 (1992) 342-348.
  4. Balandier P., Landré F., Lampin N., Ruchaud F., Understorey vegetation diversity, composition and cover according to light level under canopies of larch stands thinned with different intensities, in: "Popular summaries of the Fourth International Conference on Forest Vegetation Management", Frochot H., Collet C., Balandier P., Compilation, Nancy, France, 17-21 June 2002, INRA, 2002, pp. 157-159.
  5. Balandier P., Pauwels D., La lumière, outil sylvicole pour favoriser la diversité végétale ou la gestion cynégétique des peuplements de mélèze (Larix sp.), Forêt Wallone 61 (2002) 9-13.
  6. Balandier P., Ruchaud F., Pauwels D., Jouvie R., Predicting light transmission through canopies of larch stands (Larix sp.) in France and Belgium, in: Pâques L.E. (Ed.), "Improvement of larch (Larix sp.) for better growth, stem form and wood quality", 2002/09/16-21, Gap, Auvergne and Limousin, (FRA), INRA-Cemagref, 2002, pp. 340-349.
  7. Baldocchi D., Collineau S., The physical nature of solar radiation in heterogeneous canopies: spatial and temporal attributes, in: Caldwell M.M., Pearcy R.W. (Eds.), Exploitation of Environmental heterogeneity by plants, Academic Press, 1994, pp. 21-72.
  8. Ballaré C.L., Light gaps: sensing the light opportunities in highly dynamic canopy environments, in: Caldwell M.M., Pearcy R.W. (Eds.), Exploitation of Environmental heterogeneity by plants, Academic Press, 1994, pp. 73-110.
  9. Beaudet M., Messier C., Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient, Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1998) 1007-1015 [CrossRef].
  10. Beaudet M., Messier C., Paré D., Brisson J., Bergeron Y., Possible mechanism of sugar maple regeneration failure and replacement by beech in the Boisé-des-Muir old-growth forest, Quebec, Ecoscience 6 (1999) 264-271.
  11. Bigings G.S., Dobertin M., A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees, For. Sci. 38 (1992) 695-720.
  12. Black T.A., Chen J.M., Lee X., Sagar R.M., Characteristics of short-wave and longwave irradiances under a Douglas-fir stand, Can. J. For. Res. 21 (1991) 1020-1028.
  13. Blackburn W.J., Proctor H.T.A., Estimating photosynthetically active radiation from measured solar irradiance, Sol. Energy 31 (1983) 233-234 [CrossRef].
  14. Brown M.J., Parker G.G., Canopy light transmittance in a chronosequence of mixed-species deciduous forests, Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1994) 1694-1703.
  15. Brunner A., A light model for spatially explicit forest stand models, For. Ecol. Manage. 107 (1998) 19-46.
  16. Cannell M.G.R., Grace J., Competition for light: detection, measurement, and quantification, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1969-1979.
  17. Cannell M.G.R., Sheppard L.J., Milne R., Grace J., Light use efficiency and woody biomass production of poplar and willow, Forestry 61 (1988) 126-136.
  18. Cescatti A., Modelling the radiative transfer in discontinuous canopies of asymmetric crowns. I. Model structure and algorithms, Ecol. Model. 101 (1997) 263-274 [CrossRef].
  19. Comeau P., Measuring light in the forest, Extension note 42, Ministry of Forests Research Program, British Columbia, 2000, 7 p.
  20. Courbaud B., Comparing light interception with stand basal area for predicting tree growth, Tree Physiol. 20 (2000) 407-414 [PubMed].
  21. Cutini A., The influence of drought and thinning on leaf area index estimates from canopy transmittance method, Ann. Sci. For. 53 (1996) 595-603.
  22. Dai X., Influence of light conditions in canopy gaps on forest regeneration: a new gap light index and its application in a boreal forest in east-central Sweden, For. Ecol. Manage 84 (1996) 187-197.
  23. Ferment A., Picard N., Gourlet-Fleury S., Baraloto C., A comparison of five indirect methods for characterizing the light environment in a tropical forest, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 877-891 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  24. Geiger R., The Climate Near the Ground, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1965, 612 p.
  25. Grace J.C., Jarvis P.G., Norman J.M., Modelling the interception of solar radiation energy in intensively managed stands, N.Z. J. For. Sci. 17 (1987) 193-209.
  26. Granier A., Étude des relations entre la section du bois d'aubier et la masse foliaire chez le Douglas (Pseudotsuga menziensii (Mirb.) Franco), Ann. Sci. For. 48 (1991) 503-512.
  27. Guitton J.L., Ruchaud F., Conséquences écologiques de l'éclaircie des peuplements de résineux, Informations-Forêt 1, fiche n° 523, 1996, 6 p.
  28. Hale S.E., Light regime beneath Sitka spruce plantations in northern Britain: preliminary results, For. Ecol. Manage. 151 (2001) 61-66.
  29. Hale S.E., The effect of thinning intensity on the below-canopy light environment in a Sitka spruce plantation, For. Ecol. Manage. 179 (2003) 341-349.
  30. Houllier F., Bouchon J., Birot Y., Modélisation de la dynamique des peuplements forestiers: état et perspectives, Rev. For. Fr. 63 (1991) 87-107.
  31. Kobe R.K., Pacala S.W., Silander J.A. Jr., Canham C.D., Juvenile tree survivorship as a component of shade tolerance, Ecol. Appl. 5 (1995) 517-532.
  32. Kozlowski T.T., Kramer P.J., Pallardy S.G. (Eds.), The physiological ecology of woody plants, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991, 657 p.
  33. Kuusipalo J., On the use of tree stand parameters in estimating light conditions below the canopy, Silva Fenn. 19 (1985) 185-196.
  34. Lieffers V.J., Messier C., Stadt K.J., Gendron F., Comeau P.G., Predicting and managing light in the understorey of boreal forests, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 796-811 [CrossRef].
  35. Long J.N., Smith F.W., Leaf area - sapwood area relations of lodgepole pine as influenced by stand density and index, Can. J. For. Res. 18 (1988) 247-250.
  36. Medhurst J.L., Beadle C.L., Crown structure and leaf area index development in thinned and unthinned Eucalyptus nitens plantations, Tree Physiol. 21 (2001) 989-999 [PubMed].
  37. Meloni S., Sinoquet H., Assessment of the spatial distribution of light transmitted below young trees in an agroforestry system, Ann. Sci. For. 54 (1997) 313-333.
  38. Messier C., Nikinmaa E., Effects of light availability and sapling size on the growth, biomass allocation, and crown morphology of understory sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech, Écoscience 7 (2000) 345-356.
  39. Monsi M., Saeki T., Über den Lichtfaktor in den Planzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduction, Soc. Jap. J. Bot. 14 (1953) 22-52.
  40. Monteith J.L., Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems, J. Appl. Ecol. 9 (1972) 747-766.
  41. Mungai D.N., Stigter C.J., Coulson C.L., Ng'etich W.K., Muniafu M.M., Kainkwa R.M.R., Measuring solar radiation transmission in tropical agriculture using tube solarimeters; a warning, Agric. For. Meteorol. 86 (1997) 235-243 [CrossRef].
  42. Nilson T., A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands, Agric. Meteorol. 8 (1971) 25-38 [CrossRef].
  43. Oker-Blom P., Pukkala T., Kuuluvainen T., Relationship between radiation interception and photosynthesis in forest canopies: effect of stand structure ad latitude, Ecol. Model. 40 (1989) 73-87.
  44. Page L.M., Cameron A.D., Clarke G.C., Influence of overstorey basal area on density and growth of advance regeneration of Sitka spruce in variably thinned stands, For. Ecol. Manage. 151 (2001) 25-35.
  45. Parker G.G., Davis M.M., Moon Chapotin S., Canopy light transmittance in Douglas-fir-western hemlock stands, Tree Physiol. 22 (2002) 147-157 [PubMed].
  46. Pauwels D., Lejeune P., Balandier P., Rondeux J., A silvicultural decision support system for pure larch stands: helping managers to meet their goals, in: Pâques L.E. (Ed.), "Improvement of larch (Larix sp.) for better growth, stem form and wood quality", 2002/00/16-21, Gap, Auvergne and Limousin, (FRA), INRA-Cemagref, 2002, pp. 340-349.
  47. Porté A., Bosc A., Champion I., Lousteau D., Estimating the foliage area of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aït.) branches and crowns with application to modeling the foliage area distribution in the crown, Ann. For. Sci. 57 (2000) 73-86 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  48. Roberts S.D., Long J.N., Production efficiency of Abies lasiocarpa: influence of vertical distribution of leaf area, Can. J. For. Res. 22 (1992) 1230-1234.
  49. Roberts S.D., Long J.N., Smith F.W., Canopy stratification and leaf area efficiency: a conceptualization, For. Ecol. Manage. 60 (1993) 143-156.
  50. Ross M.S., Flanagan L.B., La Roi G.H., Seasonal and successional changes in light quality and quantity in the understory of boreal forest ecosystems, Can. J. Bot. 66 (1986) 2792-2799.
  51. Ruchaud F., Nicolaïdes O., Jouvie R., Modélisation de l'éclairement au sol dans des peuplements de résineux : proposition de sylvicultures développant la richesse spécifique du sous-bois ou la production herbacée, Rapport interne, Cemagref, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  52. Sampson D.A., Smith F.W., Influence of canopy architecture on light penetration in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) forests, Agric. For. Meteorol. 64 (1993) 63-79 [CrossRef].
  53. SAS Institute Inc., SAS/STAT Software Version 8 of the SAS System for Windows, 2000, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
  54. Sattin M., Milne R., Deans J.D., Jarvis P.G., Radiation interception measurement in poplar: sample size and comparison between tube solarimeters and quantum sensors, Agric. For. Meteorol. 85 (1997) 209-216 [CrossRef].
  55. Shinozaki K., Yoda K., Hozumi K., Kira T., A quantitative analysis of plant form - The pipe model theory. I. Basic analysis, Jap. J. Ecol. 14 (1964) 97-105.
  56. Sinoquet H., Le Roux X., Short term interactions between tree foliage and the aerial environment : an overview of modeling approaches available for the structure-function models, Ann. For. Sci. 57 (2000) 477-496 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  57. Smith H., Plant architecture and light signals, in: Marshall B., Roberts J.A. (Eds.), Leaf development and canopy growth, Sheffield Academic Press Ltd, CRC Press, 2000, pp. 118-144.
  58. Smith N.J., Predicting radiation attenuation in stands of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), For. Sci. 37 (1991) 1213-1223.
  59. Smith N.J., Estimating leaf area index and light extinction coefficient in stands of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 317-321.
  60. Toutain F., Les humus forestiers: structure et mode de fonctionnement, Rev. For. Fr. 32 (1981) 449-479.
  61. Turner D.P., Acker S.A., Means J.E., Garman S.L., Assessing alternative allometric algorithms for estimating leaf area of Douglas-fir trees and stands, For. Ecol. Manage. 126 (2000) 61-76.
  62. Usoltsev V.A., Hoffmann C.W., A preliminary crown biomass table for even-aged Picea abies stands in Switzerland, Forestry 70 (1997) 103-112 [CrossRef].
  63. Varlet-Grancher C., Chartier M., Gosse G., Bonhomme R., Rayonnement utile pour la photosynthèse des végétaux en conditions naturelles : caractérisation et variations, Acta Oecol. Oecol. Plant. 16 (1981) 189-202.
  64. Varlet-Grancher C., Gosse G., Chartier M., Sinoquet H., Bonhomme R., Allirand J.M., Mise au point : rayonnement solaire absorbé ou intercepté par le couvert végétal, Agronomie 9 (1989) 29-43.
  65. Vertessy R.A., Benyon R.G., O'Sullivan S.K., Gribben P.R., Relationships between stem diameter, sapwood area, leaf area and transpiration in a young mountain ash forest, Tree Physiol. 15 (1995) 559-567 [PubMed].
  66. Waring R.H., Schoeder P.E., Oren R., Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area, Can. J. For Res. 12 (1982) 556-560.
  67. West P.W., Model of above-ground assimilate partitioning and growth of individual trees in even-aged forest monoculture, J. Theor. Biol. 161 (1993) 369-394 [CrossRef].