EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 62 / No 1 (January-February 2005) Ann. For. Sci., 62 1 (2005) 91-94 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 62, Number 1, January-February 2005
Page(s) 91 - 94
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004095
References of Ann. For. Sci. 62 91-94
  1. Anonymous, Harmful insects of forests, The Reports of the 5th Annual Development Plan, Turkey, 1995.
  2. Austra O., Orlund A.S., Weidahl A., Growth loss and economic consequences following two years of defoliation of Pinus sylvestris by the pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer in West-Norway, Scand. J. For. Res. 2 (1987) 111-119.
  3. Avtzis N.D., The use of Bacillus thuringiensis against Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) in Greece, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, NE-247, 1998.
  4. Avtzis D.N., Control of the most dangerous insects of Greek forests and plantations, in: Liebhold A.M., Mcmanus M.L., Otvos I.S., Fosbroke S.L.C. (Eds.), Proceeding: Integrated management of forest defoliating insects, Victoria, BC, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-277, 2001, pp. 1-5.
  5. Babur H., The effect of damage of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Schiff.) in Calabrian pine seedling in Turkey, symposium on problems of Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Schiff.) in Turkey and their solutions (Kahramanmaras, Turkey), in: Kanat M. (Ed.), The Proceedings of Pine Processionary Moth Symposium (Kahramanmaras, Turkey), 2002, pp. 37-38 (with English abstract).
  6. Bektas I., Alma M.H., As N., Gundogan R., Relationship between site index and several mechanical properties of Turkish Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.), For. Prod. J. 53 (2003) 27-31.
  7. Bouchon J., Toth J., Étude préliminaire sur pertes de production des pinèdes soumises aux attaques de Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff., Ann. Sci. For. 28 (1971) 323-340.
  8. Buxton R.D., Forest management and the pine processionary moth, Outlook on Agriculture 12 (1983) 34-39.
  9. Cadehia D., Insuan A., Estimation of the injury caused by Thaumetopoea pityocampa in Pinus radiata plantation, Bol. Serv. Plagas For. 13 (1970) 159-171.
  10. Calas J., La processionaire du pin, Revue Eaux et Forêts, 1897, pp. 705-723.
  11. Canakcioglu H., Forest entomology (special section), Istanbul University, Forestry Faculty publications, Istanbul, Turkey, 1993.
  12. Canakcioglu H., Mol T., Forest entomology, Istanbul University, Forestry Faculty publications, Istanbul, Turkey, 1998.
  13. Efe E., Bek Y., Sahin M., Static methods II, University of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam publications, Kahramanmaras, Turkey, 2000.
  14. Göker Y., Technological properties of some growing trees, J. Istanbul Forestry Faculty 32 (1982) 24-30 (with English abstract).
  15. Kanat M., An Investigation on Harmful Insects in Kahramanmaras Forests, Ph.D. thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Natural Science, Trabzon, Turkey, 1998.
  16. Kanat M., Sivrikaya F., Serez M., A research on damage of pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.) on Pinus brutia Ten. Trees, and the effect of tending activities on the diameter increment of Calabran pine in Kahramanmaras, in: Kanat M. (Ed.), The Proceedings of Pine Processionary Moth Symposium, Kahramanmaras, Turkey, 2002, pp. 44-51 (with English abstract).
  17. Kanat M., Alma M.H., Insecticidal effects of essential oils from various plants against larvae of pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae), Pest Manag. Sci. 60 (2) 173-177.
  18. Laurent-Hervouet N., Mesure des pertes de croissance radiale sur quelques espèces de Pinus dues à deux défoliateurs forestiers. I. Cas de la processionnaire du pin en région méditerranéenne, Ann. Sci. For. 43 (1986) 239-262.
  19. Lemoine B., Contribution à la mesure des pertes de production causées par la chenille processionaire Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff au pin maritime dans les Landes de Gascogne, Ann. Sci. For. 34 (1977) 205-214.
  20. Lightle P.C., Weiss M.J., Dwarf misletoe of ponderosa pine in the Soutwest U.S., Departmant of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest insect & Disease Leaflet 19 (1974) 1-7.
  21. Lyytikainen-saarenmaa P., Growth responses of Scots pine (Pinacae) to artificial and sawfly (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) defoliation, Can. Entomol. 131 (1999) 455-463.
  22. Markalas S., Observations on the biology, the behavior and the damage caused by the pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.), Aristotelian University of Thessalonici, Sc. Ann. Depart. For. Nat. Environ. 28 (1985) 303-370.
  23. Markalas S., Problems on the control of the pine processionary moth, Proceeding of the symposium Protection of Forests, Hellenic For. Soc., Athens, 1986, pp. 85-88.
  24. Markalas S., Influence of the attack by Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff. on the height increment of young pine tress, Aristotelian University of Thessalonici, Sc. Ann. Depart. For. Nat. Environ. 32 (1989) 177-195.
  25. Markalas S., Biomass production of Pinus pinaster after defoliation by the pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.), USDA, For. Serv. Gen. Technical Report, NE-247, 1998.
  26. Rive J.L., Thaumetopoea pityocampa. Biology and control, Note, Inst. Rebois, Tunis, 1966.
  27. Salvato P., Battisti A., Concato S., Masutti L., Patarnello T., Zane L., Genetic differentiation in the winter pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa-wilkinsoni complex), inferred by AFLP and mitochondrial DNA markers, Mol. Ecol. 11 (2002) 2435-2444 [CrossRef].
  28. Tiberi R., Niccoli A., Curini M., Epifano F., Marcotullio M.C., Rosati O., The role of the monoterpene in Pinus spp. needles, in host selection by the pine processionary moth, Thaumetopoea pityocampa, Phytoparasitica 27 (1999) 263-272.
  29. Ziprkowski L., Roland F., Study of the toxin from the poison hairs of Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni caterpillars, J. Invest. Dermatol. 46 (1966) 439-445.