Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 63, Number 5, July-August 2006
Page(s) 557 - 565
Published online 19 July 2006
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 557-565
  1. Aboal J.R., Fernández J.A., Carballeira A., Oak leaves and pines needles as biomonitors of airborne trace element pollution, Environ. Experimen. Bot, 51 (2004) 215-225.
  2. Aerts R., Climate, leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship, Oikos 79 (1997) 439-449.
  3. André F., Ponette Q., Comparison of biomass and nutrient content between oak (Quercus petraea) and hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) trees in a coppice-with-standards in Chimay (Belgium), Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 489-502 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  4. Bakker M., Fine-root parameters as indicators of sustainability of forest ecosystems, For. Ecol. Manage. 122 (1999) 7-16 [CrossRef].
  5. Balboa M.A., Rodríguez-Soalleiro R., Álvarez-González J.G., Merino A., Temporal variations and distribution of C stocks in above-ground tree biomass of Pinus radiata and Pinus pinaster pure stands under different silvicultural alternatives, International IUFRO Conference on sustainable harvest scenarios in forest management, Talé, Slovaquia, September 2004.
  6. Barrio Anta M., Crecimiento y producción de masas naturales de Quercus robur L. en Galicia, Tesis doctoral, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 2003 (Unpublished).
  7. Bauhus J., Khanna P.K., Hopmans P., Weston C., Is soil carbon a useful indicator of sustainable forest soil management? A case study from native eucalypt forest of south-eastern Australia, For. Ecol. Manage. 171 (2002) 59-74 [CrossRef].
  8. Binkley D., O'Connell A.M., Sankaran K.V., Stand development and productivity, in: Nambiar E.K.S., Brown A.G. (Eds.), Management of Soil Nutrient and Water in Tropical Plantation Forests, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Camberra, 1997, pp. 419-442.
  9. Bosman B., Remacle J., Carnol M., Element removal in harvested tree biomass: scenarios for critical loads in Wallonia, South Belgium, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus 1 (2001) 153-167.
  10. Cairns M.A., Barker J.R., Shea R.W., Haggerty P.K., Carbon dynamics of Mexican tropical evergreen forests: influence of forestry mitigation options and refinement of carbon-flux estimates, Interciencia 21 (1996) 216-223.
  11. Carvalho J.P., Parresol B.R., Additivity in tree biomass components of Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.), For. Ecol. Manage. 179 (2003) 269-276 [CrossRef].
  12. Costa M., Morla C., Sainz C., Los bosques ibéricos, Ed. Planeta, Barcelona, 1997, 572 p.
  13. Covelo F., Gallardo A., Effect of pine harvesting on leaf nutrient dynamics in young oak trees at NW Spain, For. Ecol. Manage. 167 (2002) 161-172 [CrossRef].
  14. Cunia T., Error of forest inventory estimates: its main components, in: Wharton E.H., Cunia T. (Eds.), Estimating tree biomass regressions and their error. Proceedings of the Workshop on tree biomass regression functions and their contribution to the error of forest inventory estimates, Syracuse, New York, 1986, pp. 1-13.
  15. De Visser P.H.B., The relations between chemical composition of oak tree rings, leaf, bark and soil solution in a partly mixed stand, Can. J. For. Res. 22 (1992) 1824-1831.
  16. Díaz-Maroto I., Vila-Lameiro P., Silva-Pando F.J., Autoécologie des chênaies de Quercus robur L. en Galice (Espagne), Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 737-749 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  17. Didham R.K., Altered leaf-litter decomposition rates in tropical forest fragments, Oecologia 116 (1998) 397-406 [CrossRef].
  18. Fisher R.F., Binkley D., Ecology and Management of Forest Soils, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
  19. Fölster H., Khanna P.K., Dynamics of nutrient supply in plantations soils, in: Nambiar E.K.S., Brown A.G. (Eds.), Management of Soil Nutrient and Water in Tropical Plantation Forests, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Camberra, 1997, pp. 339-378.
  20. Furnival G.M., An index for comparing equations used on constructing volume tables, For. Sci. 7 (1961) 337-341.
  21. Glineur S., Étude dendroécologique et dendrochimique du chêne pédonculé (Quercus robur L.) dans un peuplement forestier d'Ardenne méridionale, Mémoire de Licence, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1998, 116 p.
  22. Gracia C., Sabaté S., Vayreda J., Ibáñez J., Aboveground biomass expansion factors and biomass equations of forest in Catalonia, Cost E21 BEF meeting Besalú, 4-5 July, 2002.
  23. Hart P.B.S., Clinton P.W., Allen R.B., Nordmeyer A.H., Evans G., Biomass and macro-nutrients (above and below-ground) in a New Zealand beech (Nothofagus) forest ecosystem: implications for carbon storage and sustainable forest management, For. Ecol. Manage. 174 (2003) 281-294 [CrossRef].
  24. Huet S., Forgeard F., Nys C., Above- and belowground distribution of dry matter and carbon biomass of Atlantic beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in a time sequence, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 683-694 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  25. Kozak A., Methods of ensuring additivity of biomass components by regression analysis, For. Chron. 46 (1970) 402-404.
  26. Le Goff N., Granier A., Ottorini J., Peiffer M., Biomass increment and carbon balance of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) trees in an experimental stand in northeastern France, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 577-588 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  27. Leirós M.C., Trasar-Cepeda C., Seoana S., Gil-Sotres F., Biochemical properties of acid soils under climax vegetation (Atlantic oakwood) in an area of the European temperate-humid zone (Galicia, NW Spain): general parameters, Soil Biol. Biochem. 32 (2000) 733-345 [CrossRef].
  28. Lindenmayer D.B., Franklin J.F., Conserving Forest Biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscale approach, Insland Press, Washington, 2000.
  29. Liski J., Perruchoud D., Karjalainen T., Increasing carbon stocks in the forest soils of western Europe, For. Ecol. Manage. 169 (2002) 159-175 [CrossRef].
  30. Lugo A.E., Cuevas E., Sánchez M.J., Nutrients and mass litter and top soil of ten tropical tree plantations, Plant Soil 125 (1990) 263-280.
  31. Martin J.G., Kloeppel B.D., Schaefer T.L., Kimbler D.L., Mc Nulty S.G., Aboveground biomass and nitrogen allocation of ten deciduous southern Appalachian tree species, Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1998) 1648-1659 [CrossRef].
  32. Mehlich A., Mehlich No. 3 extractant: a modification of Mehlich No. 2 extractant, Comm. Soil Sci. Plant. Anal. 15 (1984) 1409-1416.
  33. Merino A., Balboa M., Rodríguez-Soalleiro R., Álvarez González J.G., Nutritional stability of fast-growing forest plantations in northern Spain, For. Ecol. Manage. 207 (2005) 325-339 [CrossRef].
  34. Merino A., Pérez-Batallón P., Macías F., Responses of soil organic matter and greenhouse gas fluxes to changes in soil management and land use in a humid temperate region of southern Europe, Soil Biol. Biochem. 36 (2004) 917-925 [CrossRef].
  35. Meyer H.A., A correction for systematic errors occurring in the application of the logarithmic volume equation, Pennsylvania State University, Forest Research Paper, 1944, 7 p.
  36. Montero G., Ortega C., Cañellas I., Bachiller A., Productividad aérea y dinámica de nutrientes en una repoblación de Pinus pinaster Ait. Sometida a distintos regímenes de claras, Invest. Agrar. Sist. Recur. For. Fuera de Serie n° 1, 1999.
  37. Parresol B.R., Assessing tree and stand biomass: a review with examples and critical comparisons, For. Sci. 45 (1999) 573-593.
  38. Paul K.I., Polglase P.J., Richards G.P., Predicted change in soil carbon following afforestation or reforestation, and analysis of controlling factors by linking a C accounting model (CAMFor) to models of forest growth (3PG), litter decomposition (GENDEC) and soil C turnover (RothC), For. Ecol. Manage. 177 (2003) 485-501 [CrossRef].
  39. Penninckx V., Glineur S., Gruber W., Herbauts J., Meerts P., Radial variations in wood mineral element concentrations: a comparison of beech and pedunculate oak from the Belgian Ardennes, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 253-260 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  40. Pérez-Batallón P., Ouro G., Macías F., Merino A., Initial mineralization of organic matter in a forest plantation soil following logging residue management techniques, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 807-818 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  41. Rapp M., Santa Regina I., Rico M., Gallego H.A., Biomass, nutrient content, litterfall and nutrient return to the soil in Mediterranean oak forest, For. Ecol. Manage. 119 (1999) 39-49 [CrossRef].
  42. Rodríguez-Murillo J.C., Organic carbon content under different types of land use and soil in peninsular Spain, Biol. Fertil. Soils 33 (2001) 53-61 [CrossRef].
  43. Rozados M.J., Silva-Pando F.J., Alonso M., Ignacio M.F., Parámetros edáficos y foliares en una masa de Quercus robur L. en Galicia (España), Invest. Agr. Sist. Recur. For. 9 (2000) 18-30.
  44. SAS Institute, SAS STAT User's guide, 1999, Version 8. 4, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina.
  45. Silva-Pando F.J., Rigueiro Rodríguez A., Guía das árbores e bosques de Galicia, Ed. Galaxia, 1992, Vigo, 294 p.
  46. Snowdon P., Eamus D., Gibbons P., Khanna P.K., Keith H., Raison R.J., Kirschbaum M.U.F., Synthesis of allometrics, review of root biomass, and design of future woody biomass sampling strategies. National Carbon Accounting System, Technical Report No. 31, 2001, Australian Greenhouse Office, Camberra, 114 p.
  47. Turner J., Lambert M., Change in organic carbon in forest plantation soils in eastern Australia, For. Ecol. Manage. 133 (2000) 231-247 [CrossRef].
  48. Ugolini F.C., Corti G., Agnelli A., Piccardi, F., Mineral, Physical, and chemical properties of rock fragments in soil, Soil Sci. 161 (1996) 521-542 [CrossRef].
  49. UN-ECE/FAO (UN Economic Committee for Europe/Food and Agricultural Organisation), Forest resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand, Geneva Timber and Forest Study Papers No. 17, United Nations Economics Committee for Europe, Food and Agricultural Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
  50. Van Camp N., Vande Walle I., Mertens J., De Neve S., Samson R., Lust N., Lemeur R., Boeckx P., Lootens P., Beheydt D., Mestdagh I., Sleutel S., Verbeeck H., Van Cleemput O., Hofman G., Carlier L., Inventory-base carbon stock of Flemish forests: a comparison of European biomass expansion factors, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 677-682 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  51. Van der Burg J., Foliar analysis for determination of tree nutrient status - a compilation data 2, Literature 1985-1989, "De Dorschkamp", 1990, Institute for Forestry and Urban Ecology, Wageningen, Rapport No. 951.
  52. Vande Walle I., Mussche S., Samson R., Lust N., Lemeur R., The above-and belowground carbon pools of two mixed deciduous forest stands located in East-Flanders (Belgium), Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 507-517 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  53. Xunta de Galicia, O monte galego en cifras. Dirección Xeral de Montes e Medio Ambiente Natural, 2001.
  54. Zellner A., An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and test for aggregation bias, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 57 (1962) 348-368.