EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 67 / No 1 (January-February 2010) Ann. For. Sci., 67 1 (2010) 112 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 1, January-February 2010
Article Number 112
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009091
Published online 24 December 2009
  • Augusto L., Ranger J., Binkley D. and Rothe A., 2002. Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann. For. Sci. 59: 233–253 [Google Scholar]
  • Barker A.V. and Pilbeam D.J., 2007. Handbook of plant nutrition, CRC, Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
  • Brady N.C. and Weil, R.R., 2002, The nature and properties of soils, 13th edition, Prentice Hall, NJ. [Google Scholar]
  • Brooker R.W., Maestre F.T., Callaway R.M., Lortie C.L., Cavieres L., Kunstler G., et al., 2008. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J. Ecol. 96: 18–34. [Google Scholar]
  • De Schrijver A., Geudens G., Augusto L., Staelens J., Mertens J., Wuyts K., Gielis L. and Verheyen K., 2007. The effect of forest type on throughfall deposition and seepage flux: a review. Oecologia 153: 663–674 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Escudero A., García B., Gómez J.M. and Luis E., 1985. The nutrient cyling in Quercus rotundifolia and Quercus pyrenaica ecosystems (“dehesas”) of Spain. Acta Oecol. Oecol. Plant. 6: 73–86 [Google Scholar]
  • Eviner V.T. and Chapin III F.S., 2003. Functional matrix: a conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes. Ann. Rev. Ecol. S. 34: 455–485 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gallardo A., Rodríguez J.J., Covelo F. and Fernández Alés R., 2000. Soil nitrogen in a Dehesa ecosystem. Plant Soil 222: 71–82 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gallardo A., 2003. Effect of tree canopy on the spatial distribution of soil nutrients in a Mediterranean Dehesa. Pedobiologia 47: 117–125 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gea-Izquierdo G., Montero G. and Cañellas I., 2009. Changes in limiting resources determine spatio-temporal variability in tree-grass interactions. Agrofor. Syst. 76: 375–387 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Joffre R., Vacher J., De los Llanos C. and Long G., 1988. The dehesa: an agrosilvopastoral system of the Mediterranean region with special reference to the Sierra Morena area of Spain. Agrofor. Syst. 6: 71–96 [Google Scholar]
  • Koerselman W. and Meuleman A.F.M., 1996. The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 1441–1450 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ludwig F., de Kroon H., Prins H.H.T. and Berendse F., 2001. Effects of nutrients and shade on tree-grass interactions in East-African savannas. J. Veg. Sci. 12: 579–588 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ludwig F., de Kroon H., Berendse F. and Prins H.H.T., 2004. The influence of savanna trees on nutrient, water and light availability and the understorey vegetation. Plant Ecol. 170: 93–105 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Montalvo M.I., García B., Luis E. and Gómez J.M., 1980. Influencia del arbolado sobre la composición química de la hierba. Anales de Edafología y Agrobiología 39: 1287–1305 [Google Scholar]
  • Montoya J.M., 1982. Efectos del arbolado de las dehesas sobre los factores ecológicos que actúan al nivel del sotobosque. Anales INIA/Serie Forestal 5: 61–85 [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno G., Obrador J.J. and García A., 2007. Impact of evergreen oaks on soil fertility and crop production in intercropped dehesas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 119: 270–280 [Google Scholar]
  • Olea L., Paredes J. and Verdasco M.P., 1990–1991. Características y producción de los pastos de las dehesas del S.O. de la Península Ibérica. Pastos 20–21: 131–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Olea L. and San Miguel A., 2006. The Spanish dehesas: A traditional Mediterranean silvopastoral system linking production and nature conservation. Grassland Science in Europe 11: 3–13 [Google Scholar]
  • Pérez Corona M.E., García A., García B. and Vázquez de Aldana B.R., 1995. Patterns of aboveground herbage production and nutritional quality structure on semiarid grasslands. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant. Anal. 26: 1323–1341 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pérez Corona M.E., Vázquez de Aldana B.R., García B. and García A., 1998. Variation in nutritional quality and biomass production of semiarid grasslands. J. Range Manage. 51: 570–576 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Puerto A., Rico M., Gómez G.J.M., García J.A. and Rodríguez R., 1984. Influencia de la encina sobre la composición química del estrato herbáceo. Stud. Oecol. V: 151–168. [Google Scholar]
  • Puerto A. and Rico M., 1988. Influence of tree canopy (Quercus rotundifolia Lam. and Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) on old field succession in marginal areas of Central-Western Spain. Acta Oecol. 9: 337–358 [Google Scholar]
  • Puerto A. and Rico M., 1992. Spatial variability on slopes of Mediterranean grasslands: structural discontinuities in strongly contrasting topographic gradients. Vegetatio 98: 23–31 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Puerto A. and Rico M., 1996. Trees as a homogenizing factor of the herbaceous community structure and nutrient content in Mediterranean grasslands. Agrochimica XL: 197–208. [Google Scholar]
  • Rhoades C.C., 1997. Single-tree influences on soil properties in agroforestry: lessons from natural forest and savanna ecosystems. Agrofor. Syst. 35: 71–94 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodá R., Retana J., Gracia C.A. and Bellot J. 1999. Ecology of Mediterranean evergreen oak forests, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 373 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Schaetzel R.J. and Anderson S., 2006. Soil: genesis and geomorphology, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Vázquez de Aldana B.R., García A., Pérez M.E. and García B., 2000. Nutritional quality of semi-arid grassland in western Spain over a 10 year period: changes in chemical composition of grasses, legumes and forbs. Grass Forage Sci. 55: 209–220 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Verbeke G. and Molenberghs G., 2000. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data, Springer-Verlag, New York. [Google Scholar]