Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 5, July-August 2010
Article Number 503
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010005
Published online 29 April 2010
  • Augusto L., Ranger J., Binkley D., and Rothe A., 2002. Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann. For. Sci. 59: 233–253. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartelink H.H., 2000. Effects of stand composition and thinning in mixed-species forests: a modeling approach applied to Douglas-fir and beech. Tree Physiol. 20: 399–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • BMVEL, 2001. Gesamtwaldbericht der Bundesregierung. BMVEL (Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft), Bonn, 141 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bunce R.G.H., 1968. Biomass and production of trees in a mixed deciduous woodland: I. Girth and height as parameters for estimation of tree dry weight. J. Ecol. 56: 759–775. [Google Scholar]
  • Cannell M.G.R., Malcolm D.C., and Robertson P.A., 1992. The ecology of mixed-species stands of trees. Blackwell, Oxford, 312 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ellenberg H., 1996. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 981 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Enquist B.J., and Niklas K.J., 2001. Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities. Nature 410: 655–660. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fornara D.A., and Tilman D., 2008. Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation. J. Ecol. 9: 314–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gebauer T., Horna V., and Leuschner C., 2008. Variability in radial sap flux density patterns and sapwood area among seven co-occurring temperate broad-leaved tree species. Tree Physiol. 28: 1821–1830. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guckland A., Jacob M., Flessa H., Thomas F.M., and Leuschner C., 2009. Acidity, nutrient stocks- and organic-matter content in soils of a temperate deciduous forest with different abundance of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 172: 500–511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hooper D.U., Chapin F.S., Ewel J.J., Hector A., Inchausti P., Lavorel S., Lawton J.H., Lodge D.M., Loreau M., Naeem S., Schmid B., Setälä H., Symstad A.J., Vandermeer J., and Wardle D.A., 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 3–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hooper D.U., and Vitousek P.M., 1997. The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277: 1302–1305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kerr G., Nixon C.J., and Matthews R.W., 1992. Silviculture and yield of mixed-species stands: the UK experience. In: Cannell M.G.R., Malcolm D.C., Robertson P.A. (Eds.), The ecology of mixed-species stands of trees, Oxford, Blackwell Oxford, pp. 35–51. [Google Scholar]
  • Kraft G., 1884. Beiträge zur Lehre von den Durchforstungen, Schlagstellungen und Lichtungshieben. Klindworth’s Verlag, Hannover. [Google Scholar]
  • Köstler J.N., Brückner E., and Bibelriether H., 1968. Die Wurzeln der Waldbäume. Parey, Hamburg, 284 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kutschera L. and Lichtenegger E., 2002. Wurzelatlas mitteleuropäischer Waldbäume und Sträucher. Leopold Stocker Verlag, Graz, 604 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Leuschner C., 1998. Mechanismen der Konkurrenzüberlegenheit der Rotbuche. Berichte der Reinhold-Tüxen-Gesellschaft 10: 5–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Leuschner C., Jungkunst H., and Fleck S., 2009. Functional role of forest diversity: Pros and cons of synthetic stands and across-site comparisons in established forests. Basic Appl. Ecol. 10, 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meinen C., Hertel D., and Leuschner C., 2009. Biomass and morphology of fine roots in temperate broad-leaved forests differing in tree species diversity: is there evidence of below-ground overyielding? Oecologia, 161: 99–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Newman G.S., Arthur M.A., and Muller R.N., 2006. Above- and belowground net primary production in a temperate mixed deciduous forest. Ecosystems 9: 317–329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pretzsch H., 2005. Diversity and productivity in forests: evidence from long-term experimental plots. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M., Körner Ch., Schulze E.D. (Eds.), Forest Diversity and Function – Temperate and Boreal Systems, Ecological Studies 176, Springer, Berlin, pp. 41–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Pretzsch H., and Schütze G., 2009. Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. Eur. J. For. Res. 128: 183–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.Rproject.org. [Google Scholar]
  • Reiter I.M., Häberle K.H., Nunn A.J., Heerdt C., Reitmayer H., Grote R., and Matyssek R., 2005. Competitive strategies in adult beech and spruce: space-related foliar carbon investment versus carbon gain. Oecologia 146: 337–349. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rothe A., and Binkley D., 2001. Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 1855–1870. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rothe A., Kreutzer K., and Küchenhoff H., 2002. Influence of tree species composition on soil and soil solution properties in two mixed spruce-beech stands with contrasting history in Southern Germany. Plant Soil 240: 47–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rozas V., Olano J.M., De Soto L., and Bartolomé D., 2008. Large-scale structural variation and long-term growth dynamics of Juniperus thurifera trees in a managed woodland in Soria, central Spain. Ann. For. Sci. 65: 809. [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez-Gómez D., Zavala M.A., Van Schalkwijk D.B., Urbieta I.R., and Valladares F., 2008. Rank reversals in tree growth along tree size, competition and climatic gradients for four forest canopy dominant species in Central Spain. Ann. For. Sci. 65: 605. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Scherer-Lorenzen M., Körner Ch., and Schulze E.D., 2005. The functional significance of forest diversity: a synthesis. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M., Körner Ch., Schulze E.D. (Eds.), Forest Diversity and Function – Temperate and Boreal Systems, Ecological Studies 176, Springer, Berlin, pp. 377–389. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt I., Leuschner C., Mölder A., and Schmidt W., 2009. Structure and composition of the seed bank in monospecific and tree species-rich temperate broad-leaved forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 257: 695–702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Spehn E.M., Hector A., Joshi J., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Schmid B., Bazeley-White E., Beierkuhnlein C., Caldeira M.C., Diemer M., Dimitrakopoulos P.G., Finn J.A., Freitas H., Giller P.S., Good J., Harris R., Högberg P., Huss-Danell K., Jumpponen A., Koricheva J., Leadley P.W., Loreau M., Minns A., Mulder C.P.H., O’Donovan G., Otway S.J., Palmborg C., Pereira J.S., Pfisterer A.B., Prinz A., Read D.J., Schulze E.D., Siamantziouras A.S.D., Terry A.C., Troumbis A.Y., Woodward F.I., Yachi S., and Lawton J.H., 2005. Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 37–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Szwagrzyk J., and Gazda A., 2007. Above-ground standing biomass and tree species diversity in natural stands of Central Europe. J. Veg. Sci. 18: 555–562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilà M., Vayreda J., Gracia C., and Ibáñez J.J., 2003. Does tree diversity increase wood production in pine forests? Oecologia 135: 299–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilà M., Vayreda J., Comas L., Ibáñez J.J., Mata T., and Obón B., 2007. Species richness and wood production: a positive association in Mediterranean forests. Ecol. Lett. 10: 241–250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wirth C., Schulze E.D., Schwalbe G., Tomczyk S., Weber G., and Weller E., 2004. Dynamik der Kohlenstoffvorräte in den Wäldern Thüringens. Thüringer Landesanstalt für Wald, Jagd und Fischerei, Gotha, 302 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Yachi S., and Loreau M., 2007. Does complementary resource use enhance ecosystem functioning? A model of light competition in plant communities. Ecol. Lett. 10: 54–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zianis D., Muukkonen P., Mäkipää R., and Menuccini M., 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fenn. Monogr. 4, 63 p. [Google Scholar]