EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 67 / No 7 (October-November 2010) Ann. For. Sci., 67 7 (2010) 710 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 7, October-November 2010
Article Number 710
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010035
Published online 05 October 2010
  • Barr A.G.,Black T.A.,Hogg E.H.,Kljun N.,Morgenstern K., and Nesic Z., 2004. Inter-annual variability in the leaf area index of a boreal aspen-hazelnut forest in relation to net ecosystem production. Agric. For. Meteorol. 126: 237–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barton C. and Montagu K., 2006. Effect of spacing and water availability on root: shoot ratio in Eucalyptus camaldulensis. For. Ecol. Manage. 221: 52–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Bauhus J. and Messier C., 1999. Soil exploitation strategies of fine roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 260–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benjamin J. and Nielsen D., 2006. Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Fields Crops Res. 97: 248–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Block R., Van Rees K., and Knight J., 2006. A review of fine root dynamics in Populus plantations. Agrofor. Syst. 67: 73–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Claus A. and George E., 2005. Effect of stand age on fine-root biomass and biomass distribution in three European forest chronosequences. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 1617–1625. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gao Y.,Giese M.,Lin S.,Sattelmacher B.,Zhao Y., and Brueck H., 2008. Belowground net primary productivity and biomass allocation of a grassland in Inner Mongolia is affected by grazing intensity. Plant Soil 307: 41–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gill R.A. and Jackson R.B., 2000. Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytol. 147: 13–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gower S.,Vogel J.,Norman J.,Kucharik C.,Steele S., and Stow T., 1997. Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. J. Geophys. Res. 102: 29–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Hogg E.H. and Hurdle P.A., 1995. The aspen parkland in western Canada – a dry-climate analog for the future boreal forest. Water Air Soil Pollut. 82: 391–400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Joslin J. and Wolfe M., 1998. Impacts of water input manipulations on fine root production and mortality in a mature hardwood forest. Plant Soil 204: 165–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalyn A.L. and Van Rees K.C.J., 2006. Contribution of fine roots to ecosystem biomass and net primary production in black spruce, aspen, and jack pine forests in Saskatchewan. Agric. For. Meteorol. 140: 236–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • King J.,Pregitzer K., and Zak D., 1999. Clonal variation in above-and below-ground growth responses of Populus tremuloides Michaux: influence of soil warming and nutrient availability. Plant Soil 217: 119–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • King J.,Pregitzer K.,Zak D.,Sober J.,Isebrands J.,Dickson R.,Hendrey G., and Karnosky D., 2001. Fine-root biomass and fluxes of soil carbon in young stands of paper birch and trembling aspen as affected by elevated atmospheric CO2 and tropospheric O3. Oecologia 128: 237–250. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lambert M.,Ung C., and Raulier F., 2005. Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 1996–2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Landhäusser S.,DesRochers A., and Lieffers V., 2001. A comparison of growth and physiology in Picea glauca and Populus tremuloides at different soil temperatures. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 1922–1929. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liang Y.,Hazlett D., and Lauenroth W., 1989. Biomass dynamics and water use efficiencies of five plant communities in the shortgrass steppe. Oecologia 80: 148–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meier I. and Leuschner C., 2008. Belowground drought response of European beech: fine root biomass and carbon partitioning in 14 mature stands across a precipitation gradient. Glob. Change Biol. 14: 2081–2095. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Metcalfe D.,Meir P., and Williams M., 2007. A comparison of methods for converting rhizotron root length measurements into estimates of root mass production per unit ground area. Plant Soil 301: 279–288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Milchunas D.G.,Morgan J.A.,Mosier A.R., and LeCain D.R., 2005. Root dynamics and demography in shortgrass steppe under elevated CO2, and comments on minirhizotron methodology. Glob. Change Biol. 11: 1837–1855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peltzer D. and Wilson S., 2001. Variation in plant responses to neighbors at local and regional scales. Am. Nat. 157: 610–625. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pregitzer K., 2002. Fine roots of trees-a new perspective. New Phytol. 154: 267–270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pregitzer K.,DeForest J.,Burton A.,Allen M.,Ruess R., and Hendrick R., 2002. Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecol. Monogr. 72: 293–309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pregitzer K.S.,Zak D.R.,Maziasz J.,DeForest J.,Curtis P.S., and Lussenhop J., 2000. Interactive effects of atmospheric CO2 and soil-N availability on fine roots of Populus tremuloides. Ecol. Appl. 10: 18–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Snyder K. and Williams D., 2007. Root allocation and water uptake patterns in riparian tree saplings: responses to irrigation and defoliation. For. Ecol. Manage. 246: 222–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steele S.J.,Gower S.T.,Vogel J.G., and Norman J.M., 1997. Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. Tree Phys. 17: 577–587. [Google Scholar]
  • Steinaker D. and Wilson S., 2008. Phenology of fine roots and leaves in forest and grassland. J. Ecol. 96: 1222–1229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steinaker D.F., 2006. Belowground and aboveground plant dynamics in a grassland-forest ecotone and experimental monocultures. MSc. Thesis, Department of Biology, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan. [Google Scholar]
  • Steinaker D.F. and Wilson S.D., 2005. Belowground litter contributions to nitrogen cycling at a northern grassland-forest boundary. Ecology 86: 2825–2833. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tateno R.,Hishi T., and Takeda H., 2004. Above-and belowground biomass and net primary production in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in relation to topographical changes in soil nitrogen. For. Ecol. Manage. 193: 297–306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman D., 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Tschaplinski T.,Tuskan G.,Gebre G., and Todd D., 1998. Drought resistance of two hybrid Populus clones grown in a large-scale plantation. Tree Physiol. 18: 653–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • West J.,Espeleta J., and Donovan L., 2004. Fine root production and turnover across a complex edaphic gradient of a Pinus palustris-Aristida stricta savanna ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manage. 189: 397–406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson S.D. and Kleb H.R., 1996. The influence of prairie and forest vegetation on soil moisture and available nitrogen. Am. Midl. Nat. 136: 222–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]