Uncertainty estimation of biomass expansion factors for Norway spruce in the Czech Republic
Ann. For. Sci., 64 2 (2007) 133-140
Published online: 2007-02-24
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Assessment of a probabilistic supervised machine learning method to estimate biomass expansion and conversion factors: a case study on cedar and pine trees
Maria J. Diamantopoulou, Emine Kurnaz, Şerife Kalkanlı Genç, Şükrü Teoman Güner, Aydın Çömez and Ramazan ÖzçelikCanadian Journal of Forest Research 55 1 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2024-0135
Comprehensive propagation of errors for the prediction of woody biomass
Stephen H. Roxburgh and Keryn I. PaulMethods in Ecology and Evolution 16 (1) 197 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14471
Inversion models of aboveground grassland biomass in Xinjiang based on multisource data
R. P. Zhang, J. H. Zhou, J. Guo, Y. H. Miao and L. L. ZhangFrontiers in Plant Science 14 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1152432
Quantifying the Effects of Stand and Climate Variables on Biomass of Larch Plantations Using Random Forests and National Forest Inventory Data in North and Northeast China
Xiao He, Xiangdong Lei, Weisheng Zeng, Linyan Feng, Chaofan Zhou and Biyun WuSustainability 14 (9) 5580 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095580
Selected Aspects of Carbon Stock Assessment in Aboveground Biomass
Vilém Pechanec, Lenka Štěrbová, Jan Purkyt, Marcela Prokopová, Renata Včeláková, Ondřej Cudlín, Pavel Vyvlečka, Emil Cienciala and Pavel CudlínLand 11 (1) 66 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010066
Error Analysis on the Five Stand Biomass Growth Estimation Methods for a Sub-Alpine Natural Pine Forest in Yunnan, Southwestern China
Guoqi Chen, Xilin Zhang, Chunxiao Liu, Chang Liu, Hui Xu and Guanglong OuForests 13 (10) 1637 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/f13101637
Quantify and account for field reference errors in forest remote sensing studies
Henrik Jan Persson, Magnus Ekström and Göran StåhlRemote Sensing of Environment 283 113302 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113302
Stand-level biomass models for predicting C stock for the main Spanish pine species
Ana Aguirre, Miren del Río, Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado and Sonia CondésForest Ecosystems 8 (1) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00308-w
How large is the difference in large-scale forest biomass estimations based on new climate-modified stand biomass models?
Xiao He, Xiang-Dong Lei and Li-Hu DongEcological Indicators 126 107569 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107569
Biomass Expansion Factors for Hedgerow-Grown Trees Derived from Terrestrial LiDAR
Sanne Van Den Berge, Pieter Vangansbeke, Kim Calders, et al.BioEnergy Research 14 (2) 561 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-021-10250-y
Carbon stock in Japanese forests has been greatly underestimated
Tomohiro Egusa, Tomo’omi Kumagai and Norihiko ShiraishiScientific Reports 10 (1) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64851-2
Timber and Branch Volume Prediction: Effects of Stand and Site Characteristics on Dendromass and Timber-To-Branch Volume Ratio of Norway Spruce in Managed Forests
Václav Štícha, Ram P. Sharma, Zdeněk Vacek, Stanislav Vacek and Ondřej NuhlíčekForests 10 (2) 144 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020144
Parameterisation of allometric equations for quantifying aboveground biomass of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) in the Czech Republic
Tomáš Čihák and Monika VejpustkováJournal of Forest Science 64 (3) 108 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.17221/61/2017-JFS
Variations in the biomass of Eucalyptus plantations at a regional scale in Southern China
Quanyi Qiu, Guoliang Yun, Shudi Zuo, et al.Journal of Forestry Research 29 (5) 1263 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0534-0
Allometric relationship and biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for above- and below-ground biomass prediction and stem volume estimation for ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and oak (Quercus robur L.)
Jan Krejza, Jan Světlík and Pavel BednářTrees 31 (4) 1303 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-017-1549-z
Uncertainty assessment in aboveground biomass estimation at the regional scale using a new method considering both sampling error and model error
Yu Fu, Yuancai Lei, Weisheng Zeng, Ruijun Hao, Guilian Zhang, Qicheng Zhong and Mingshan XuCanadian Journal of Forest Research 47 (8) 1095 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0436
Evaluating Carbon Stock Changes in Forest and Related Uncertainty
Pasquale Marziliano, Giuliano Menguzzato and Vittoria ColettaSustainability 9 (10) 1702 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101702
A new method for capturing stem taper variation for trees of diverse morphological types
David W. MacFarlane and Aaron R. WeiskittelCanadian Journal of Forest Research 46 (6) 804 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0018
Comparing tree foliage biomass models fitted to a multispecies, felled-tree biomass dataset for the United States
Brian J. Clough, Matthew B. Russell, Grant M. Domke, Christopher W. Woodall and Philip J. RadtkeEcological Modelling 333 79 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.04.009
Tree component biomass expansion factors and root-to-shoot ratio of Lebombo ironwood: measurement uncertainty
Tarquinio Mateus Magalhães and Thomas SeifertCarbon Balance and Management 10 (1) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-015-0019-4
Models for predicting aboveground biomass of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the Czech Republic
M. Vejpustková, D. Zahradník, T. Čihák and V. ŠrámekJournal of Forest Science 61 (2) 45 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.17221/100/2014-JFS
71 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14708-6_8
Evaluation of Four Methods for Predicting Carbon Stocks of Korean Pine Plantations in Heilongjiang Province, China
Huilin Gao, Lihu Dong, Fengri Li, Lianjun Zhang and RunGuo ZangPLOS ONE 10 (12) e0145017 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145017
Allometric relationships for the estimation of dry mass of aboveground organs in young highland Norway spruce stand
Irena Marková and Radek PokornýActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 59 (6) 217 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159060217
Assessment of Biomass Expansion Factor (BEF) and Root-to-shoot Ratio (R) for some Tree Species of Uttarakhand, India
Laxmi Rawat, Pramod Kumar and Nishita GiriIndian Journal of Forestry 37 (4) 371 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2014-4X81ZI
Individual tree biomass equations or biomass expansion factors for assessment of carbon stock changes in living biomass – A comparative study
Hans Petersson, Sören Holm, Göran Ståhl, et al.Forest Ecology and Management 270 78 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.004
Biomass expansion factors for Eucalyptus globulus stands in Portugal
P. Soares and M. ToméForest Systems 21 (1) 141 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2112211-12086
Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocol
Gillian Petrokofsky, Hideki Kanamaru, Frédéric Achard, et al.Environmental Evidence 1 (1) 6 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2382-1-6
Significance of carbon stock uncertainties on emission reductions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries
Johanne Pelletier, Kathryn R. Kirby and Catherine PotvinForest Policy and Economics 24 3 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.05.005
Individual biomass factors for beech, oak and pine in Slovakia: a comparative study in young naturally regenerated stands
Jozef Pajtík, Bohdan Konôpka and Martin LukacTrees 25 (2) 277 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-010-0504-z
Incorporating management history into forest growth modelling
CS Eastaugh and H HasenaueriForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 4 (5) 212 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0597-004
Belowground biomass functions and expansion factors in high elevation Norway spruce
B. Konopka, J. Pajtik, V. Seben and M. LukacForestry 84 (1) 41 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpq042
EU-wide maps of growing stock and above-ground biomass in forests based on remote sensing and field measurements
Heinz Gallaun, Giuliana Zanchi, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, et al.Forest Ecology and Management 260 (3) 252 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.011
Biomass carbon sinks in Japanese forests: 1966-2012
N. Sasaki and S. KimForestry 82 (1) 105 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpn049
Development of forest carbon stock and wood production in the Czech Republic until 2060
Emil Cienciala, Zuzana Exnerová and Mart-Jan SchelhaasAnnals of Forest Science 65 (6) 603 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008043
Uncertainty analysis of climate change mitigation options in the forestry sector using a generic carbon budget model
Hannes Böttcher, Annette Freibauer, Michael Obersteiner and Ernst-Detlef SchulzeEcological Modelling 213 (1) 45 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.007
Generic biomass functions for Common beech (Fagus sylvatica) in Central Europe: predictions and components of uncertainty
Thomas Wutzler, Christian Wirth and Jens SchumacherCanadian Journal of Forest Research 38 (6) 1661 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-194
Biomass functions and expansion factors in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) trees
Jozef Pajtík, Bohdan Konôpka and Martin LukacForest Ecology and Management 256 (5) 1096 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.013
The Continental-Scale Greenhouse Gas Balance of Europe
Raisa Mäkipää, Aleksi Lehtonen and Mikko PeltoniemiEcological Studies, The Continental-Scale Greenhouse Gas Balance of Europe 203 191 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76570-9_10