EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 64 / No 2 (March 2007) Ann. For. Sci., 64 2 (2007) 133-140 References
Open Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 64, Number 2, March 2007
Page(s) 133 - 140
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006097
Published online 24 February 2007
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 64 (2007) 133-140
  1. Cerný M., Biomass of Picea abies (L.) Karst. in Midwestern Bohemia, Scand. J. For. Res. 5 (1990).
  2. CHMI, National greenhouse gas emission inventory report of the Czech Republic, NIR, (reported inventory 2003) (2005).
  3. Dean T.J., Cao Q.V., Inherent correlations between stand biomass variables calculated from tree measurements, For. Sci. 49 (2003) 279-284.
  4. Eid T., Use of uncertain inventory data in forestry scenario models and consequential incorrect harvest decisions, Silva Fenn. 34 (2000) 89-100.
  5. Fang J.-Y., Chen A., Peng C., Zhao S., Ci L., Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998, Science 292 (2001) 2320-2322 [CrossRef].
  6. Heath L.S., Smith J.E., An assessment of uncertainty in forest carbon budget projections, Environ. Sci. Policy 3 (2000) 73-82 [CrossRef].
  7. IPCC, Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry, IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, 2003.
  8. Jalkanen A., Mäkipää R., Ståhl G., Lehtonen A., Petersson H., Estimation of biomass stock of trees in Sweden: comparison of biomass equations and age-dependent biomass expansion factors, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 845-851 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  9. Korhonen K.T., Maltamo M., Männyn maanpäällisten osien kuivamassat Etelä-Suomessa, Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 371 (1990) 1-29 + appendix 12 p.
  10. Laasasenaho J., Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch, Comm. Inst. For. Fenn. 108 (1982) 1-74.
  11. Lappi J., Calibration of height and volume equations with random parameters, For. Sci. 37 (1991) 781-801.
  12. Lehtonen A., Mäkipää R., Heikkinen J., Sievänen R., Liski J., Biomass expansion factors (BEF) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 188 (2004) 211-224 [CrossRef].
  13. Levy P.E., Hale S.E., Nicoll B.C., Biomass expansion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain, Forestry 77 (2004) 421-430 [CrossRef].
  14. Löwe H., Seufert G., Raes F., Comparison of methods used within member states for estimating CO2 emissions and sinks according to UNFCCC and EU monitoring mechanism: forest and other wooded land, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 4 (2000) 315-319.
  15. Marklund L.G., Biomassafunktioner för tall, gran och björk i Sverige, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Rapporter-Skog 45 (1988) 1-73.
  16. McCulloch C.E., Searle S.R., Generalized, Linear and Mixed Models, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New York, 2000.
  17. Monni S., Peltoniemi M., Palosuo T., Lehtonen A., Mäkipää R., Savolainen I., Uncertainty of forest carbon stock changes - implications to the total uncertainty of GHG inventory of Finland, Clim. Change (2007) (in press).
  18. Muukkonen P., Lehtonen A., Needle and branch biomass turnover rates of Norway spruce (Picea abies), Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004) 2517-2527 [CrossRef].
  19. Peltoniemi M., Palosuo T., Monni S., Mäkipää R., Factors affecting the uncertainty of sinks and stocks of carbon in Finnish forests soils and vegetation, For. Ecol. Manage. 232 (2006) 75-85 [CrossRef].
  20. Petrás R., Pajtík J., Sústava Cesko-slovenských objemových tabuliek drevín (The set of Czecho-Slovakian volume tables of tree species), Lesnícky casopis 37 (1991) 49-56.
  21. SAS, SAS/STAT$^\circledR$ User's Guide, Version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA., 1999.
  22. Satoo T., Madgwick H.A.I., Forest biomass, Martinus Nijhoff / Dr W. Junk Publisher, The Hague, 1982.
  23. Shvidenko A., Nilsson S., Dynamics of Russian forests and the carbon budget in 1961-1998: an assessment based on long-term forest inventory data, Clim. Change 55 (2002) 5-37 [CrossRef].
  24. Smith J.E., Heath L.S., Identifying influences on model uncertainty: an application using a forest carbon budget model, Environ. Manage. 27 (2001) 253-267 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  25. Somogyi Z., Cienciala E., Mäkipää R., Lehtonen A., Muukkonen P., Weiss P., Indirect methods of large scale forest biomass estimation, Eur. J. For. Res. (2007) (in press).
  26. Ståhl G., Boström B., Lindkvist H., Lindroth A., Nilsson J., Olsson M., Methodological options for quantifying changes in carbon pools in Swedish forests, Stud. For. Suec. 214 (2004) 1-46.
  27. Vande Walle I., Van Camp N., Perrinc D., Lemeur R., Verheyen K., Van Wesemael B., Laitat E., Growing stock-based assessment of the carbon stock in the Belgian forest biomass, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 853-864 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  28. Wirth C., Schumacher J., Schulze E.D., Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe - a meta-analysis approach towards prediction and uncertainty estimation, Tree Phys. 24 (2004) 121-139.