Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 60, Number 7, October-November 2003
Technical, Environmental and Economic challenges of Forest Vegetation Management
Page(s) 559 - 572
References of Ann. For. Sci. 60 559-572
  1. Abusow K., Canadian forest management certification status report. Status report prepared for the Canadian Sustainable Forestry Certification Coalition, Abusow International, Ottawa ON, 2002, p. 8.
  2. Bell F.W., Buse L.J., Wagner R.G., Lautenschlager R.A., Neal J.C., Factors that promote or limit the use of vegetation management alternatives by forest managers in Ontario, Proceedings of the forty-ninth annual meeting of the Northeastern Weed Science Society, Boston, MA, 1995, pp. 96-97.
  3. Bell F.W., Pitt D.G., Irvine M., Parker W.C., Buse L.J., Stocker N., Towill W.D., Chen H., Pinto F., Brown K., DeYoe D., McDonough T., Smith G., Weber M., Intensive forest management in Ontario: Summary of a 1999 science workshop, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, 2000.
  4. Bell F.W., Lautenschlager R.A., Wagner R.G., Pitt D.G., Hawkins J.G., Ride, K., Motor-manual, mechanical, and herbicide release affect early successional vegetation in northwestern Ontario, For. Chron. 73 (1997) 61-68.
  5. Bell F.W., Pitt D.G., Mallik A.U, Hollstedt H., Seasonal Susceptibility of Boreal Plants to Glyphosate I: Blue-Joint Grass and Black Spruce, North. J. Appl. For. 17 (2000) 141-148.
  6. Bell F.W., Pitt D.G., Morneault A., Pickering S., Response of immature trembling aspen to season and height of cut, North. J. Appl. For. 16 (1999) 108-114.
  7. Bell F.W., Ter-Mikaelian M.T., Wagner R.G., Relative competitiveness of nine early-successional boreal forest species associated with planted jack pine and black spruce seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 790-800 [CrossRef].
  8. Binkely C.S., Preserving nature through intensive plantation forestry: The case for forest land allocation with illustrations from British Columbia, For. Chron. 73 (1997) 553-559.
  9. Biring B.S., Comeau P.G., Fielder P., Long-term effects of vegetation control treatments for release of Engelmann spruce from a mixed-shrub community in Southern British Columbia, Ann. Sci. For. 60 (2003) 681-690.
  10. Biring B.S., Hays-Byl W.J., Hoyles S.E., Twelve-year conifer and vegetation responses to discing and glyphosate treatments on a BWBSmw backlog site., Working Paper, Ministry of Forests Research Program, British Columbia. No. 43, 1999, 34 p.
  11. Brett P., Benskin H., Guidelines for cost-effective intensive forest management in B.C., Pulp and Pap. Can. 79 (1978) 66-68.
  12. British Columbia Ministry of Forests - Forest Science Program Annual Report 2000/2001, British Columbia, Ministry of Forests, Research Branch, 2001, p. 53.
  13. Burgess D., Larocque G.R., Brand D.G., Forest growth and future yields: The importance of today's regeneration practices, in: Wagner R.G., Colombo S.J. (Eds.), Regenerating the Canadian forest - principles and practice for Ontario, Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham, ON, 2001, pp. 604-624.
  14. Buse L.J., Bell F.W., Critical silvics of selected crop and competitor species in northwestern Ontario, Northwestern Ontario Forest Technology Development Unit, Thunder Bay, Ontario, 1992, 138 p.
  15. Campbell R.A., Herbicide use for forest management in Canada: where we are and where we are going, For. Chron. 66 (1990) 335-360.
  16. Campbell R.A., Silvicultural herbicides in Canada: registration status and research trends, For. Chron. 67 (1991) 520-527.
  17. Campbell R.A., Howard K.M., Priorities for forestry herbicide application technology research, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 2204-2212.
  18. Campbell R.A., Wood J.E., Thompson D.G., Iskra E., Site preparation - chemical, in: Wagner R.G., Colombo S.J. (Eds.), Regenerating the Canadian forest - principles and practice for Ontario, Limited, Markham, ON, 2001, pp. 221-239.
  19. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers, National Forestry Database Program, 2002,
  20. Clements D.R., Peterson D.J., Prasad R., The biology of Canadian weeds, 112, Ulex europaeus L., Can. J. Plant Sci. 81 (2001) 325-337.
  21. Comeau P.G., Biring B.S., Harper G.J., Effectiveness of repeated manual cutting and glyphosate for release of Engelmann spruce from mixed-shrub herb vegetation, Western J. Appl. For. 15 (2000) 154-162.
  22. Comeau P.G., Biring B.S., Harper G.J., Conifer response to brushing treatments: a summary of British Columbia data, Extension Note, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, 1999, No. 41, 12 p.
  23. de Bellefeuille S., Belanger L., Huot J., Cimon A., Clear-cutting and regeneration practices in Quebec boreal balsam fir forest: effects on snowshoe hare, Can. J. For. Res. 31 (2001) 41-51 [CrossRef].
  24. Dey D.C., MacDonald G.B., Overstorey manipulation, in: Wagner R.G., Colombo S.J. (Eds.), Regenerating the Canadian forest - principles and practice for Ontario, Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham, ON, 2001, pp. 157-175.
  25. Dunster J., Dunster K., Dictionary of Natural Resource Management, UBC Press, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1996.
  26. Erdle T.A., The conflict in managing New Brunswick's forests for timber and other values, For. Chron. 75 (1999) 945-954.
  27. Forest Research Advisory Council of Canada, Forest Research Priorities in Canada, 1991, For. Chron. 68 (1992) 121-125.
  28. Gaskell G., Bauer M.W., DuRant J., Allum N.C., Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S., Science 285 (1999) 384-387 [CrossRef].
  29. Goldsborough L.G., Brown D.J., Dissipation of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water and sediments of boreal forest ponds, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12 (1993) 1139-1147.
  30. Gosselin L., Jobidon R., Bernier L., Genetic variability and structure of Canadian populations of Chondrostereum purpureum, a potential biophytocide, Molecular Ecol. 8 (1999) 113-122.
  31. Government of Canada, Action plans of the federal government in response to the National Forest Strategy (1998-2003) - Sustainable Forests: A Canadian Commitment, 1999.
  32. Groot A., Effects of shelter and competition on the early growth of planted white spruce (Picea glauca), Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 1002-1014 [CrossRef].
  33. Grossnickle S.C., Parker W.C., Blake T.J., Sutton R.F., Ecophysiological principles, in: Wagner R.G., Colombo S.J., (Eds.), Regenerating the Canadian forest - principles and practice for Ontario, Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham, ON, 2001, pp. 91-118.
  34. Haeussler S., Coates D., Mather J., Autecology of common plants in British Columbia: a literature review, FRDA Report Victoria, British Columbia, No. 158, 1990, vi + 272 p.
  35. Harper G.J., Comeau P.G., Hintz W., Wall R.E., Prasad R., Becker E.M., Chondrostereum purpureum as a biological control agent in forest vegetation management. II. Efficacy on Sitka alder and aspen in western Canada, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 852-858 [CrossRef].
  36. Hearnden K.W., Millson S.V., Wilson W.C., A report on the status of forest regeneration, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 1992, p. 117.
  37. Hood S.M., Zedaker S.M., Aust W.M., Smith D.W., Universal soil loss equation (USLE) predicted soil loss for harvesting regimes in Appalachian hardwoods, North. J. Appl. For. 19 (2002) 53-58.
  38. Imo M., Timmer V.R., Vector competition analysis of black spruce seedling responses to nutrient loading and vegetation control, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 474-486 [CrossRef].
  39. Imo M., Timmer V.R., Growth and nitrogen retranslocation of nutrient loaded Picea mariana seedlings planted on boreal mixedwood sites, Can. J. For. Res. 31 (2001) 1357-1366 [CrossRef].
  40. Jobidon R., Comparative efficacy of biological and chemical control of the vegetative reproduction in Betula papyrifera and Prunus pensylvanica, Biol. Conserv. 11 (1998) 22-28.
  41. Jobidon R., Roy V., Cyr G., Net effect of competing vegetation on selected environmental conditions and performance of four spruce seedling stock sizes after eight years in Quebec (Canada), Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 691-699.
  42. Jobidon R., Trottier F., Charette L., Chemical or manual weed control in black spruce plantations? Case study in the balsam fir - white birch [ecosystem] in Quebec, For. Chron. 75 (1999) 973-979.
  43. Jull M.J., Stevenson S.K., The Lucille Mountain study: 8-year results of a silvicultural systems trial in the Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir zone, Working Paper, Ministry of Forests Research Program, British Columbia, No. 59, 2001, x + 93 p.
  44. Lafleche V., Ruel J.C., Archambault L., Evaluation of logging with protection of regeneration and soil as a method of regenerating mixed wood stands in the bioclimatic zone of balsam fir and yellow birch in eastern Quebec, For. Chron. 76 (2000) 653-663.
  45. Lautenschlager R.A., Bell F.W., Wagner R.G., Reynolds P.E., The Fallingsnow Ecosystem Project: documenting the consequences of conifer release alternatives, J. For. 96 (1998) 20-27.
  46. Lieffers V.J., Macmillan R.B., MacPherson D., Branter K., Stewart J.D., Semi-natural and intensive silvicultural systems for the boreal mixedwood forest, For. Chron. 72 (1996) 286-292.
  47. MacDonald G.B., Harvesting boreal mixedwood stands to favour conifer regeneration: project establishment and early results, Forest Research Report, Ontario Forest Research Institute, No. 157, 2000, 20 p.
  48. Malik V., Timmer V.R., Growth, nutrient dynamics, and interspecific competition of nutrient-loaded black spruce seedlings on a boreal mixedwood site, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 1651-1659.
  49. Maynard D.G., MacIsaac D.A., Krause H., Soil nutrient and vegetation response to patch clear-cutting of an aspen forest near Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan, Sustainable site productivity in Canadian forests workshop, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, February 1997, Can. J. Soil Sci. 78 (1998) 59-68.
  50. Mitchell A.K., Growth limitations for conifer regeneration under alternative silvicultural systems in a coastal montane forest in British Columbia, Canada, For. Ecol. Manage. 145 (2001) 129-136.
  51. Moses R.A., Boutin S., The influence of clear-cut logging and residual leave material on small mammal populations in aspen-dominated boreal mixedwoods, Can. J. For. Res. 31 (2001) 483-495 [CrossRef].
  52. Natural Resources Canada, Silvicultural terms in Canada (2nd ed.), Policy, economics and International Affairs Directorate, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1995, p. 109.
  53. Natural Resources Canada, State of Canada's Forests Report, 1999-2000,, Forests in the new millenium, 2000.
  54. Nautiyal J.C., Williams J.S., Innes M.R., Gravelines L., Ghebremichael A., Financial Evaluation, in: Wagner R.G., Colombo S.J. (Eds.), Regenerating the Canadian forest - principles and practice for Ontario, Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham, ON, 2001, pp. 589-602.
  55. Oliver C.D., The future of the forest management industry: Highly mechanized plantations and reserves or a knowledge-intensive integrated approach? For. Chron. 75 (1999) 229-245.
  56. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 1999 Ontario Forest Accord - A foundation for progress, Queen's Printer for Ontario, Toronto, Canada, 1999, 136 p.
  57. Perie C., Munson A.D., Ten-year responses of soil quality and conifer growth to silvicultural treatments, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64 (2000) 1815-1826.
  58. Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) - Health Canada, Proposed regulatory decision document PRDD2002-01, 2002, p. 30.
  59. Pitt D.G., Dumas M.T., Wall R.E., Thompson D.G., Lanteigne L., Hintz W., Sampson G., Wagner R.G., Chondrostereum purpureum as a biological control agent in forest vegetation management. I. Efficacy on speckled alder, red maple, and aspen in eastern Canada, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 841-851 [CrossRef].
  60. Pitt D.G., Krishka C.S., Bell F.W., Lehela A., Five-year performance of three conifer stock types on fine sandy loam soils treated with hexazinone, North. J. Appl. For. 16 (1999) 72-81.
  61. Pitt D.G., Morneault A.E., Bunce P., Bell F.W., Five years of vegetation succession following vegetation management treatments in a jack pine ecosystem, Nor. J. Appl. For. 17 (2000) 100-109.
  62. Pitt D.G., Wagner R.G., Towill W.T., Ten years of vegetation succession following ground-applied release treatments in young black spruce plantations, North. J. Appl. For. (in press).
  63. Ryans M., Sutherland B., Site preparation - mechanical, in: Wagner R.G., Colombo S.J. (Eds.), Regenerating the Canadian forest - principles and practice for Ontario, Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham, ON, 2001, pp. 177-199.
  64. Scagel C.F., Linderman R.G., Modification of root IAA concentrations, tree growth, and survival by application of plant growth regulating substances to container-grown conifers, New For. 21 (2001) 159-186.
  65. Sidhu S.S., Feng J.C., Hexazinone and its metabolites in boreal forest vegetation, Weed Sci. 41 (1993) 281-287.
  66. Simpson J.A., Gordon A.M., Reynolds P.E., Lautenschlager R.A., Bell F.W., Gresch D.A., Buckley D.A., Influence of alternative conifer release treatments on soil nutrient movement, Fallingsnow Ecosystem Project, For. Chron. 73 (1997) 69-73.
  67. Staples T.E., van Rees K.C.J., van Kessel C., Nitrogen competition using 15N between early successional plants and planted white spruce seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 1282-1289 [CrossRef].
  68. Statistics Canada, Statistics Canada's Internet Site, 2000, Data extracted 08/2000,
  69. Sullivan T.P., Wagner R.G., Pitt D.G., Changes in diversity of plant and small mammal communities after herbicide application in sub-boreal spruce forest, Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1998) 168-177 [CrossRef].
  70. Sutton R.F., White spruce establishment: initial fertilization, weed control and irrigation evaluated after three decades, New For. 9 123-133.
  71. Ter-Mikaelian M.T., Wagner R.G., Bell F.W., Shropshire C., Comparison of photosynthetically active radiation and cover estimation for measuring the effects of interspecific competition on jack pine seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 883-889 [CrossRef].
  72. Thiffault N., Jobidon R., Munson A.D., Performance and physiology of large containerized and bare-root spruce seedlings in relation to scarification and competition in Québec (Canada), Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 645-655.
  73. Thomas K.D., Comeau P.G., Brown K.R., The silviculture of hybrid poplar plantations, Extension Note, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, No. 47, 2000, 7 p.
  74. Thomas K.D., Reid W.J., Comeau P.G., Vegetation management using polyethylene mulch mats and glyphosate herbicide in a coastal British Columbia hybrid poplar plantation: four-year growth response, West. J. Appl. For. 16 (2001) 26-30.
  75. Thompson D.G., Holmes S.B., Verkley L.M., Canadian Forest Pest Management Database, 2001,
  76. Thompson D.G., Kreutzweiser D.P., Capell S.S., Thomas D.R., Staznik B., Viinikka T., Fate and effects of triclopyr ester in a first-order forest stream, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14 (1995) 1307-1317.
  77. Thompson D.G., Pitt D.G., Buscarini T.M., Staznik B., Thomas D.R., Comparative fate of glyphosate and triclopyr herbicides in the forest floor and mineral soil of an Acadian forest regeneration site, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 1808-1816 [CrossRef].
  78. Thompson D.G., Pitt D.G., Campbell R.A., Herbicides and forestry - The scientific perspective, Forestry on the Hill - Special Issue on Herbicides and Forestry 5 (1991) 53-59.
  79. Thompson D.G., Pitt D.G., Staznik B., Payne N.J., Jaipersaid D., Lautenschlager R.A., Bell F.W., On-target deposit and vertical distribution of aerially released herbicides, For. Chron. 73 (1997) 47-59.
  80. Thompson D.G., Watson A.K., Dorworth C., Dumas M., Strunz G., Jobidon R., Harris P., Castello J., Wagner R., BICOVER - A national research network on biological control of competing vegetation, Proceedings of the 1st International Weed Control Congress 2 (1992) 522-526.
  81. Wagner R.G., Research directions to advance forest vegetation management in North America, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 2317-2327.
  82. Wagner R.G., Competition and critical-period thresholds for vegetation management decisions in young conifer stands, For. Chron. 76 (2000) 961-968.
  83. Wagner R.G., Bell F.W., Campbell R.A., Vegetation management, in: Wagner R.G., Colombo S.J. (Eds.), Regenerating the Canadian forest - principles and practice for Ontario, Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham, ON, 2001, pp. 431-458.
  84. Wagner R.G., Buse L.J., Lautenschlager R.A., Bell F.W., Hollstedt C., Strobl S., Morneault A., Lewis W., Ter-Mikaelian M.T., Vegetation Management Alternatives Program 1994-95 Annual Report, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1995, p. 99.
  85. Wagner, R.G., Colombo S.J., Regenerating the Canadian forest - principles and practice for Ontario, Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Markham, ON, 2001.
  86. Wagner R.G., Flynn J., Gregor R., Public perceptions of risk and acceptability of forest vegetation management alternatives in Ontario, For. Chron. 74 (1998) 720-727.
  87. Wagner R.G., Mohammed G.H., Noland T.L., Critical period of interspecific competition for northern conifers associated with herbaceous vegetation, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 890-897 [CrossRef].
  88. Wall R.E., Biological control of red alder using stem treatments with the fungus Chondrostereum purpureum, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 1527-1530.
  89. Wall R.E., Fructification of Chondrostereum purpureum on hardwoods inoculated for biological control, Can. J. Plant Pathol. 19 (1997) 181-184.
  90. Walstad J.D., Kuch P.J., Forest vegetation management for conifer production, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987.
  91. Walstad J., Newton M., Gjerstad D., Overview of vegetation management alternatives, in: Walstad J., Kuch P. (Eds.), Forest Vegetation Management for Conifer Production, New York, N.Y. 1987, pp. 157-200.
  92. Watkinson A.R., Freckleton R.P., Robinson R.A., Sutherland W.J., Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops Science 289 (2000) 1554-1557.
  93. Weetman G., Distinctly Canadian silviculture and forest management, For. Chron. 77 (2001) 441-445.
  94. Wood J.E., Dominy S.W.J., Mechanical site preparation and early chemical tending in white spruce: 19-year results, For. Chron. 64 (1988) 177-181.