EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 61 / No 1 (January-February 2004) Ann. For. Sci., 61 1 (2004) 73-80 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 61, Number 1, January-February 2004
Page(s) 73 - 80
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003086
References of Ann. For. Sci. 61 73-80
  1. Aas G., Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: a contribution to the hybrid controversy, Ann. Sci. For. 50 (1993) 107s-113s.
  2. Aranda I., Bergasa L.F., Gil L., Paros J.A., Effects of relative irradiance on the leaf structure of Fagus sylvatica L. seedlings planted in the understory of a Pinus sylvestris L. stand after thinning, Ann. For. Sci. 58 (2001) 673-680 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  3. Bacilieri R., Ducousso A., Kremer A., Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a mixed stand of Northwest France, Silvae Genet. 44 (1995) 1-10.
  4. Baranski M., An analysis of variation within white oak (Quercus alba L.). North Carolina Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 236 (1975) 176 p.
  5. Blue M.P., Jensen R.J., Positional and seasonal variation in oak (Quercus; Fagaceae) leaf morphology, Am. J. Bot. 75 (1988) 939-947.
  6. Bodénès C., Joandet S., Laigret F., Kremer A., Detection of genomic regions differentiating two closely related oak species Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L., Heredity 78 (1997) 433-444 [CrossRef].
  7. Dupouey J.-L., Analyse multivariable de quelques caractères morphologiques de populations de chênes [Quercus robur L. et Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] du Hurepoix, Ann. Sci. For. 40 (1983) 265-282.
  8. Dupouey J.-L., Badeau V., Morphological variability of oaks [Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Quercus pubescens Willd] in northeastern France: preliminary results, Ann. Sci. For. 50 (1993) 35s-40s.
  9. Feuillat F., Dupouey J-L., Sciama D., Keller R., A new attempt at discrimination between Quercus petraea and Quercus robur based on wood anatomy, Can. J. For. Res. 27 (1997) 343-351 [CrossRef].
  10. Fontaine F., Chaar H., Colin F., Clément C., Burrus M., Druelle J.-L., Preformation and neoformation of growth units on 3-year-old seedlings of Quercus petraea, Can. J. Bot. 77 (1999) 1623-1631.
  11. Fontaine F., Druelle J-L., Clément C., Burrus M., Audran J-C., Ontogeny of proventitious epicormic buds in Quercus petraea. I. In the 5 years following initiation, Trees 13 (1998) 54-62 [CrossRef].
  12. Grandjean G., Sigaud P., Contribution à la taxonomie et à l'écologie des chênes du Berry, Ann. Sci. For. 44 (1987) 35-66.
  13. Kissling P., Clef de détermination des chênes médioeuropéens (Quercus L.). Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 90 (1980) 29-44.
  14. Kleinschmit J.R.G., Bacilieri R., Kremer A., Roloff A., Comparison of morphological and genetic traits of pedunculate oak (Q. robur L.) and sessile oak [Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.], Silvae Genet. 44 (1995) 256-269.
  15. Kremer A., Dupouey J-L., Cottrell J., Csaikl U., Deans D., Finkeldey R., Goikoetxea P., Jensen J., König A., Van Dam B., Ducousso A., Badeau V., Morphological variation in mixed oak stands (Quercus robur and Quercus petraea) is stable across western European populations, Ann. For. Sci. 59 (2002) 777-787 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  16. Lévy G., Becker M., Duhamel D., A comparison of the ecology of pedunculate and sessile oaks: radial growth in the centre and northwest of France, For. Ecol. Manage. 55 (1992) 51-63.
  17. Masarovicova E., Pozgaj J., Comparative analysis of the leaf area in three oak species - a methodical contribution, Biológia (Bratislava) 43 (1988) 449-457.
  18. Moreau F., Kleinschmit J.R.G., Kremer A., Molecular differentiation between Quercus petraea and Quercus robur assessed by random amplified DNA fragments, For. Genet. 1 (1994) 51-64.
  19. Muir G., Fleming C.C., Schlötterer C., Species status of hybridizing oak, Nature 405 (2000) 1016 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  20. Olsson U., A morphological analysis of phenotypes in populations of Quercus (Fagaceae) in Sweden, Bot. Not. 128 (1975) 55-68.
  21. Ponton S., Dupouey J-L., Bréda N., Dreyer E., Comparison of water-use efficiency of seedlings from two sympatric oak species: genotype × environment interactions, Tree Physiol. 22 (2002) 413-422 [PubMed].
  22. Potter S.M., Practical methods for distinguishing the two native British oaks and their intermediates, Q. J. For. 88 (1994) 27-34.
  23. Rushton B.S., Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: a multivariate approach to the hybrid problem, 1. Data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, Watsonia 12 (1978) 81-101.
  24. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6.03, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., 4th ed., 1989, 1848 p.