Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 63, Number 7, October-November 2006
Page(s) 749 - 761
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006056
Published online 18 October 2006
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 749-761
  1. Anderson M.C., Stand structure and light penetration. II. A theoretical analysis, J. Appl. Ecol. 3 (1966) 41-54.
  2. Barbosa P., Wagner M.R., Introduction to forest and shade tree insects, Academic Press, San Diego, 1989.
  3. Barnes B.B., Zak D.R., Denton S.R., Spurr S.H., Forest ecology, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1998.
  4. Beckage B., Clark J.S., Seedling survival and growth of three forest tree species: the role of spatial heterogeneity, Ecol. 84 (2003) 1849-1861.
  5. Bellow J.G., Nair P.K.R., Comparing common methods for assessing understory light availability in shaded-perennial agroforestry systems, Agric. For. Meteorol. 114 (2003) 197-211 [CrossRef].
  6. Blondel J., Aronson J., Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region, Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
  7. Campbell G.S., Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution, Agric. For. Meteorol. 36 (1986) 317-321 [CrossRef].
  8. Canham C.D., Denslow J.S., Platt W.J., Runkle J.R., Spies T.A., White P.S., Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests, Can. J. For. Res. 20 (1990) 620-631.
  9. Canham C.D., Finzi A.C., Pacala S.W., Burbank D.H., Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests - interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 337-349.
  10. Chazdon R.L., Sunflecks and their importance to forest understory plants, Adv. Ecol. Res. 18 (1988) 1-63.
  11. Chazdon R.L., Pearcy R.W., The importance of sunflecks for forest understory plants, BioSci. 41 (1991) 760-766.
  12. Chen J.M., Black T.A., Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves, Plant Cell Environ. 15 (1992) 421-429.
  13. Chen J.M., Black T.A., Adams R.S., Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand, Agric. For. Meteorol. 56 (1991) 129-143 [CrossRef].
  14. Clark D.B., Clark D.A., Rich P.M., Weiss S.B., Oberbauer S.F., Landscape-scale evaluation of understory light and canopy structure: methods and application in a neotropical lowland rain forest, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 747-757.
  15. Ducrey M., Sylviculture des taillis de chêne vert. Pratiques traditionnelles et problématique des recherches récentes, Rev. For. Fr. 40 (1988) 302-313.
  16. Duncan R.P., Flood disturbance and the coexistence of species in a lowland podocarp forest, south Westland, New Zealand, J. Ecol. 81 (1993) 403-416.
  17. Englund S.R., O'Brien J.J., Clark D.B., Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 1999-2005 [CrossRef].
  18. Ettema C.H., Wardle D.A., Spatial soil ecology, Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 (2002) 177-183 [CrossRef].
  19. Ferres L., Biomasa, producción y mineralomasa del encinar de La Castanya (Montseny), Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain, 1984.
  20. Gracia C., Response of the evergreen oak to the incident radiation at the Montseny (Barcelona, Spain), Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 131 (1984) 595-597.
  21. Gracia C., Bellot J., Baeza J., Tello E., Sabate S., Roda F., A long-term thinning experiment on a Quercus ilex L. forest: Main working hypotheses and experimental design, in: International symposium on experimental manipulations of biota and biogeochemical cycling in ecosystems: approach, methodologies, findings, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1992.
  22. Gratani L., Canopy structure, vertical radiation profile and photosynthetic function in a Quercus ilex evergreen forest, Photosynthetica 33 (1997) 139-149 [CrossRef].
  23. Horn H.S., The adaptive geometry of trees, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1971.
  24. Instituto-Nacional-de-Meteorología, Calendario meteorológico 2003, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, 2003.
  25. Isaaks E.H., Srivastava R.M., An introduction to applied geostatistics, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989.
  26. Jurena P.N., Archer S., Woody plant establishment and spatial heterogeneity in grasslands, Ecology 84 (2003) 907-919.
  27. Korning J., Thomsen K., A new method for measuring tree height in tropical rain forest, J. Veg. Sci. 5 (1994) 139-140.
  28. Kuuluvainen T., Tree architectures adapted to efficient light utilization: is there a basis for latitudinal gradients? Oikos 65 (1992) 275-284.
  29. Legendre P., Forin M.J., Spatial pattern and ecological analysis, Vegetatio, 80 (1989) 107-138.
  30. Miglioretti F., Contribution à l'étude de la production des taillis de chêne vert en forêt de la Gardiole de Rians (Var), Ann. Sci. For. 44 (1987) 227-242.
  31. Montgomery R.A., Chazdon R., Forest structure, canopy architecture, and light transmittance in tropical wet forests, Ecology 82 (2001) 2707-2718.
  32. Moran P.A.P., Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika 37 (1950) 17-23 [PubMed] [MathSciNet].
  33. Nicotra A.B., Chazdon R.L., Iriarte S.V.B., Spatial heterogeneity of light and woody seedling regeneration in tropical wet forests, Ecology 80 (1999) 1908-1926.
  34. Nocentini S., Piusii P., Osservazioni priliminari sulla macchia del Parco della Maremma, Inf. Bot. ital. 9 (1977) 174-184.
  35. Pearcy R.W., Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41 (1990) 421-453.
  36. Pearcy R.W., Pfitsch W.A., The consequences of sunflecks for photosynthesis and growth of forest understory plants, in: Schulze E.-D., Caldwell M.M. (Eds.), Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1994, pp. 343-359.
  37. Rich P.M., Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs, Remote Sens. Rev. 5 (1990) 13-29.
  38. Rich P.M., Clark D.B., Clark D.A., Oberbauer S.F., Long-term study of solar radiation regimes in a tropical wet forest using quantum sensors and hemispherical photography, Agric. For. Meteorol. 65 (1993) 107-127 [CrossRef].
  39. Ross J., Sulev M., Sources of errors in measurements of PAR, Agric. For. Meteorol. 100 (2000) 103 [CrossRef].
  40. Roxburgh J.R., Kelly D., Uses and limitations of hemispherical photography for estimating forest light environments, N. Z. J. Ecol. 19 (1995) 213-217.
  41. Sabaté S., Sala A., Gracia C.A., Leaf traits and canopy organization, in: Rodá F. et al. (Eds.), Ecology of Mediterranean evergreen oak forests, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999, pp. 121-134.
  42. Sala A., Tenhunen J.D., Site-specific water relations and stomatal response of Quercus ilex L. in a Mediterranean watershed, Tree Physiol. 14 (1994) 601-617 [PubMed].
  43. Scarascia-Mugnozza G., Oswald H., Piussi P., Radoglou K., Forests of the Mediterranean region: gaps in knowledge and research needs, For. Ecol. Manage. 132 (2000) 97-109 [CrossRef].
  44. Schnitzer S.A., Carson W.P., Treefall gaps and the maintenance of species diversity in a tropical forest, Ecology 82 (2001) 913-919.
  45. Serrada-Hierro R., Bravo-Fernández J.A., Roig-Gómez S., Brotación en encinas (Quercus ilex subsp. ballota) con edades elevadas. Experiencias en el monte de Riofrío (Segovia), Investig. Agrar. Sist. Recur. For. (2004) 127-141.
  46. Sonohat G., Balandier P., Ruchaud F., Predicting solar radiation transmittance in the understory of even-aged coniferous stands in temperate forests, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 629-641 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  47. Valladares F., Light and the evolution of leaf morphology and physiology, Curr. Top. Plant Biol. 4 (2003) 47-61.
  48. Valladares F., Light heterogeneity and plants: from ecophysiology to species coexistence and biodiversity, in: Esser K. et al. (Eds.), Progress in Botany, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2003, pp. 439-471.
  49. Valladares F., Allen M.T., Pearcy R.W., Photosynthetic response to dynamic light under field conditions in six tropical rainforest shrubs occurring along a light gradient, Oecologia 111 (1997) 505-514 [CrossRef].
  50. Valladares F., Pearcy R.W., The geometry of light interception by shoots of Heteromeles arbutifolia: morphological and physiological consequences for individual leaves, Oecologia 121 (1999) 171-182 [CrossRef].
  51. Wagner H.H., Spatial covariance in plant communities: integrating ordination, geostatistics, and variance testing, Ecology 84 (2003) 1045-1057.
  52. Weiss S.B., Rich P.M., Murphy D.D., Calvert W.H., Ehrlich P.R., Forest canopy structure at overwintering monarch butterfly sites - Measurements with hemispherical photography, Conserv. Biol. 5 (1991) 165-175 [CrossRef].
  53. Wiens J.A., Ecological heterogeneity: an ontogeny of concepts and approaches, in: Hutchings M.J., John E.A., Stewart A.J.A. (Eds.), The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity, Balckwell Science, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 9-31.