Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 64, Number 3, April-May 2007
Page(s) 239 - 246
Published online 11 April 2007
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 64 (2007) 239-246
  1. Apiolaza L.A., Garrick D.J., Breeding objectives for three silvicultural regimes of radiata pine, Can. J. For. Res. 31 (2001) 654-662 [CrossRef].
  2. Australian Forestry Standard Steering Committee, Interim Australian StandardTM: Forest management - Economic, social, environmental and cultural criteria and requirements for wood production (known as The Australian Forestry Standard), Australian Forestry Standard Project Office, Standards Australia, Canberra, 2003.
  3. Beets P.N., Whitehead D., Carbon partitioning in Pinus radiata stands in relation to foliage nitrogen status, Tree Physiol. 16 (1996) 131-138 [PubMed].
  4. Bernardo A.L., Reis M.G.F., Reis G.G., Harrison R.B., Firme D.J., Effect of spacing on growth and biomass distribution in Eucalyptus camaldulensis, E. pellita and E. urophylla plantations in southeastern Brazil, For. Ecol. Manage. 104 (1998) 1-13 [CrossRef].
  5. Borralho N.M.G., Cotterill P.P., Kanowski P.J., Genetic parameters and gains expected from selection for dry weight in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus in Portugal, For. Sci. 38 (1992) 80-94.
  6. Borralho N.M.G., Cotterill P.P., Kanowski P.J., Breeding objectives for pulp production of Eucalyptus globulus under different industrial cost structures, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 648-656.
  7. Borralho N.M.G., Dutkowski G.W., Comparison of rolling front and discrete generation breeding strategies for trees, Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1998) 987-993 [CrossRef].
  8. Brand D.G., Cowie A., Lamb K., Developing the products and markets for carbon sequestration in planted forests, Proceedings of IUFRO conference: the future of eucalypts for wood products, University of Tasmania Timber Research Unit, Launceston, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, 2000.
  9. Burley J., Kanowski P.J., Breeding strategies for temperate hardwoods, Forestry 78 (2005) 199-208 [CrossRef].
  10. Commonwealth of Australia, Plantations for Australia: the 2020 Vision, Ministerial Council on Forestry, Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Canberra, 1997.
  11. Côté W.A., Young R.J., Risse K.B., Costanza A.F., Tonelli J.P., Lenocker C., A carbon balance method for paper and wood products, Environ. Pollut. 116 (2002) S1-S6 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  12. Dean C., Roxburgh S., Mackey B.G., Forecasting landscape-level carbon sequestration using gridded, spatially adjusted tree growth, For. Ecol. Manage. 194 (2004) 109-129 [CrossRef].
  13. Decisioneering Inc., Crystal Ball, 2000.
  14. Goldemberg J., Beyond Kyoto: A second commitment period, Environment 47 (2005) 39-40.
  15. Greaves B.L., Borralho N.M.G., Raymond C.A., Breeding objective for plantation eucalypts grown for production of kraft pulp, For. Sci. 43 (1997) 465-472.
  16. Harbard J.L., Griffin A.R., Espejo J., Mass controlled pollination of Eucalyptus globulus: a practical reality, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 1457-1463 [CrossRef].
  17. Hockenstein J.B., Stavins R.N., Whitehead B.W., Crafting the next generation of market-based environmental tools, Environment 39 (1997) 12-33.
  18. Jayawickrama K.J.S., Potential genetic gains for carbon sequestration: a preliminary study on radiata pine plantations in New Zealand, For. Ecol. Manage. 152 (2001) 313-322 [CrossRef].
  19. Kerr R.J., McRae T.A., Dutkowski G.W., Apiolaza L.A., Tier B., TREEPLAN $^{\circledR}$ - A genetic evaluation system for forest tree improvement, IUFRO Symposium: Developing the eucalypt of the future, INFOR, Santiago, Valdivia, Chile, 2001.
  20. Lecocq F., State and trends of the carbon market 2004, World Bank, Washington DC, 2004.
  21. Madeira M.V., Fabiao A., Pereira J.S., Araujo M.C., Ribeiro C., Changes in carbon stocks in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantations induced by different water and nutrient availability, For. Ecol. Manage. 171 (2002) 75-85 [CrossRef].
  22. Malhi Y., Baldocchi D.D., Jarvis P.G., The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal forests, Plant Cell Environ. 22 (1999) 715-740.
  23. Mendham D.S., O'Connell A.M., Grove T.S., Rance S.J., Residue management effects on soil carbon and nutrient contents and growth of second rotation eucalypts, For. Ecol. Manage. 181 (2003) 357-372 [CrossRef].
  24. Misra R.K., Turnbull C.R.A., Cromer R.N., Gibbons A.K., LaSala A.V., Below-and above-ground growth of Eucalyptus nitens in a young plantation. I. Biomass, For. Ecol. Manage. 106 (1998) 283-293 [CrossRef].
  25. Montreal Process Liaison Office, The Montreal Process: Year 2000 progress report, The Montreal Process Liaison Office, Ottawa, 2000, p. 63.
  26. National Forest Inventory, National Plantation Inventory, Australia: Annual Update March 2003, in: Allison B., Wood M. (Eds.), Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2003.
  27. National Forest Inventory, Australia's forests at a glance, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2004.
  28. Pallett R.N., Sale G., The relative contributions of tree improvement and cultural practice toward productivity gains in Eucalyptus pulpwood stands, For. Ecol. Manage. 193 (2004) 33-43 [CrossRef].
  29. Pate J.S., Arthur D.J., Uptake, partitioning and utilization of carbon and nitrogen in the phloem bleeding tree, Tasmanian blue gum (Eucalyptus globulus), Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27 (2000) 869-884.
  30. Pingoud K., Lehtilä A., Fossil carbon emissions associated with carbon flows of wood products, Mitigation Adapt. Strat. Global Change 7 (2002) 63-83.
  31. Ponzoni R.W., A profit equation for the definition of the breeding objective of Australian merino sheep, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 103 (1986) 342-357.
  32. Reed D., Tomé M., Total aboveground biomass and net dry matter accumulation by plant component in young Eucalyptus globulus in response to irrigation, For. Ecol. Manage. 103 (1998) 21-32 [CrossRef].
  33. Reid W.V., Mooney H.A., Cropper A., Capistrano D., Carpenter S.R., Chopra K., Dasgupta P., Dietz T., Duraiappah A.K., Hassan R., Kasperson R., Leemans R., May R.M., McMichael T., Pingali P., Samper C., Scholes R., Watson R.T., Zakri A.H., Shidong Z., Ash N.J., Bennett E., Kumar P., Lee M.J., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Simons H., Thonell J., Zurek M.B., Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report, in: Sarukhán J., Whyte A. (Eds.), Millenium ecosystem assessment: Strengthening capacity to manage ecosystems sustainably for human well-being, IEG India, SCOPE France, UNEP Kenya, UNEP-WCMC UK, WRI & Meridian Institute USA, RIVM Netherlands, WorldFish Center Malaysia, 2005.
  34. Searle S.R., Phenotypic, genetic and environmental correlations, Biometrics 17 (1961) 474-480.
  35. Stavins R.N., What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO2 allowance trading, J. Econ. Perspect. 12 (1998) 69-88.
  36. Stavins R.N., Forging a more effective global climate treaty, Environment 46 (2004) 22-30.
  37. Stavins R.N., Richards K.R., The cost of U.S. forest-based carbon sequestration, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA, 2005.
  38. Volker P.W., Orme R.K., Provenance trials of Eucalyptus globulus and related species in Tasmania, Aust. For. 51 (1988) 257-265.
  39. Watson R.T., Noble I.R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N.H., Verardo D.J., Andrasko K., Apps M., Brown S., Farquhar G., Goldberg D., Hamburg S., Houghton R., Jarvis P., Karjalainen T., Kheshgi H., Krug T., Kurz W., Lashof D., Lim B., Makundi W., Manning M., Marland G., Masera O., Murdiyarso D., Murray B., Persson R., Sampson N., Sathaye J., Scholes R., Schlamadinger B., Sombroek W., Prisley S., Stone J., Sukumar R., Valentini R., Land-use, land use change, and forestry, in: Watson R.T., Noble I.R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N.H., Verardo D.J., Dokken D.J. (Eds.), IPCC Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 1-20.
  40. Weller J.I., Economic aspects of animal breeding, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994.
  41. Whittock S.P., Apiolaza L.A., Kelly C.M., Potts B.M., Genetic control of coppice and lignotuber development in Eucalyptus globulus, Aust. J. Bot. 51 (2003) 57-67 [CrossRef].
  42. Whittock S.P., Greaves B.L., Apiolaza L.A., A cash flow model to compare coppice and genetically improved seedling options for Eucalyptus globulus pulpwood plantations, For. Ecol. Manage. 191 (2004) 267-274 [CrossRef].