EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 64 / No 3 (April-May 2007) Ann. For. Sci., 64 3 (2007) 247-254 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 64, Number 3, April-May 2007
Page(s) 247 - 254
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007002
Published online 11 April 2007
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 64 (2007) 247-254
  1. Ammer C., Wagner S., Problems and options in modelling fine-root biomass of single mature Norway spruce trees at given points from stand data, Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002) 581-590 [CrossRef].
  2. Ammer C., Wagner S., An approach for modelling the mean fine-root biomass of Norway spruce stands, Trees 19 (2005) 145-153 [CrossRef].
  3. Böhm W., Methods of studying root systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.
  4. Bolte A., Hertel D., Ammer C., Schmid I., Nörr R., Kuhr M., Redde N., Freilandmethoden zur Untersuchung von Baumwurzeln, Forstarchiv 74 (2003) 240-262.
  5. Chen W., Zhang Q., Cihlar J., Bauhus J., Price D.T., Estimating fine-root biomass and production of boreal and cool temperate forests using aboveground measurements: a new approach, Plant Soil 265 (2004) 31-46 [CrossRef].
  6. Curt T., Coll L., Prévosto B., Balandier P., Kunstler G., Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 51-60 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  7. Jackson R.B., Caldwell M.M., Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants, J. Ecol. 81 (1993) 683-692.
  8. Jackson R.B., Mooney H.A., Schulze E.D., A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (1997) 7362-7366 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  9. Krull E.S., Bray S.G., Assessment of vegetation change and landscape variability by using stable carbon isotopes of soil organic matter, Aust. J. Bot. 53 (2005) 651 [CrossRef]- 661.
  10. Kurz W.A., Beukema S.J., Apps M.J., Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 1973-1979.
  11. Lee E.H., Tingey D.T., Beedlow P.A., Johnson M.G., McKane R.B., A spatial analysis of fine-root biomass from stand data in the Pacific Northwest, Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004) 2169-2180 [CrossRef].
  12. Li Z., Kurz W.A., Apps M.J., Beukema S.J., Belowground biomass dynamics in the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP, Can. J. For. Res. 33 (2003) 126-136 [CrossRef].
  13. Ludlow M.M., Troughton J.H., Jones R.J., A technique for determining the proportion of C3 and C4 species in plant samples using stable natural isotopes of carbon, J. Agric. Sci. 87 (1976) 625-632.
  14. Madeira M.V., Fabiao A., Pereira J.S., Araujo M.C., Ribeiro C., Changes in carbon stocks in Eucalyptus globulus labill. plantations induced by different water and nutrient availability, For. Ecol. Manage. 171 (2002) 75-85 [CrossRef].
  15. Nielsen C.C.N., Mackenthun G., Die horizontale Variation der Feinwurzelintensität in Waldböden in Abhängigkeit von der Bestockungsdichte. Eine rechnerische Methode zur Bestimmung der "Wurzelintensitäts-Glocke" an Einzelbäumen, Allg. Forst- u. Jagdztg. 162 (1991) 112-119.
  16. Pemán J., Voltas J., Gil-Pelegrin E., Morphological and functional variability in the root system of Quercus ilex L. subject to confinement: consequences for afforestation, Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 425-430 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  17. Quinn G.P., Keough M.J., Experimental design and data analysis for biologists, Cambridge, New York, Port Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  18. Robinson D., Resource capture by localised root proliferation: why do plants bother? Ann. Bot. 77 (1996) 179-185 [CrossRef].
  19. Schenk H.J., Jackson R.B., Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems, J. Ecol. 90 (2002) 480-494.
  20. Schulze E.-D., Beck E., Müller-Hohenstein K., Plant Ecology, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2005.
  21. Stone E.L., Kalisz P.J., On the maximum extent of tree roots, For. Ecol. Manage. 46 (1991) 59-102 [CrossRef].
  22. Sudmeyer R.A., Speijers J., Nicholas B.D., Root distribution of Pinus pinaster, P. radiata, Eucalyptus globulus and E. kochii and associated soil chemistry in agricultural land adjacent to tree lines, Tree Physiol. 24 (2004) 1333-1346 [PubMed].
  23. Vogt K.A., Vogt D.J., Bloomfield J., Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at the ecosystem level, Plant Soil 200 (1998) 71-89 [CrossRef].
  24. Zerihun A., Montagu K.D., Belowground to aboveground biomass ratio and vertical root distribution responses of mature Pinus radiata stands to phosphorus fertilisation at planting, Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004) 1883-1894 [CrossRef].
  25. Zerihun A., Montagu K.D., Hoffmann M.B., Bray S.G., Patterns of belowground and aboveground biomass in Eucalyptus populnea woodland communities of northeast Australia along a rainfall gradient, Ecosystems 9 (2006) 501-515 [CrossRef].
  26. Zohar Y., Root distribution of eucalypt shelterbelts, For. Ecol. Manage. 12 (1985) 305-307 [CrossRef].