Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 64, Number 5, July-August 2007
Page(s) 477 - 490
Published online 17 July 2007
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 64 (2007) 477-490
  1. Alberta Land and Forest Services, Land and Forest Services Permanent Sample Plot Field Procedures Manual, For. Manage. Div., Edmonton, Alberta, 2002.
  2. Alemdag I.S., Evaluation of some competition indices for the prediction of diameter increment in planted white spruce, Can. For. Serv. Inf. Rep. FMR-X-108, 1978.
  3. Bartelink H.H., Effects of stand composition and thinning in mixed-species forests: a modeling approach applied to Douglas-fir and beech, Tree Physiol. 20 (2000) 399-406 [PubMed].
  4. Beckingham J.D., Archibald J.H., Field guide to ecosites of northern Alberta, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC, 1996.
  5. Beckingham J.D., Corns I.G.W., Archibald J.H., Field guide to ecosites of west-central Alberta. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC, 1996.
  6. Biging G.S., Dobbertin M., A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees, For. Sci. 38 (1992) 695-720.
  7. Biging, G.S., Dobbertin M., Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models, For. Sci. 41 (1995) 360-377.
  8. Brunner A., A light model for spatially explicit forest stand models, For. Ecol. Manage. 107 (1998) 19-46 [CrossRef].
  9. Burton P.J., Some limitations inherent to static indices of plant competition, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 2141-2151.
  10. Canham C.D., Finzi A.C., Pacala S.W., Burbank D.H., Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 337-349.
  11. Canham C.D., Coates K.D., Bartemucci P., Quaglia S., Measurement and modeling of spatially explicit variation in light transmission through interior cedar-hemlock forests of British Columbia, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 1775-1783 [CrossRef].
  12. Canham C.D., LePage P.T., Coates K.D., A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition: effects of shading versus crowding, Can. J. For. Res. 34 (2004) 778-787 [CrossRef].
  13. Coates K.D., Canham C.D., Beaudet M., Sachs D.L., Messier C., Use of a spatially explicit individual-tree model (SORTIE/BC) to explore the implications of patchiness in structurally complex forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 186 (2003) 297-310 [CrossRef].
  14. Comeau P.G., Braumandl T.F., Xie C.Y., Effects of overtopping vegetation on light availability and growth of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 2044-2048.
  15. Connell J.H., Apparent versus "real" competition in plants, in: Grace J.B., Tilman D. (Eds.), Perspectives on Plant Competition, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1990, pp. 9-26.
  16. Corona P., Ferrara A., Individual competition indices for conifer plantations, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 27 (1989) 429-437.
  17. Cumming S.G., Schmiegelow F.K.A., Burton P.J., Gap dynamics in boreal aspen stands: is the forest older than we think? Ecol. Appl. 10 (2000) 744-759.
  18. Dang Q.L., Lieffers V.J., Assessment of patterns of response of tree ring growth of black spruce following peatland drainage, Can. J. For. Res. 19 (1989) 924-929.
  19. Daniels R.F., Simple competition indices and their correlation with annual loblolly pine tree growth, For. Sci. 22 (1976) 454-460.
  20. Daniels R.F., Burkhart H.E., Clason T.R., A comparison of competition measures for predicting growth of loblolly pine trees, Can. J. For. Res. 16 (1986) 1230-1237 [CrossRef].
  21. Hegyi F., A simulation model for managing jack pine stands, in: Fries J. (Ed.), Growth models for tree and stand simulation, Royal Coll. For., Stockholm, 1974, pp. 74-90.
  22. Holmes M.J., Reed D.D., Competition indices for mixed species northern hardwoods, For. Sci. 37 (1991) 1338-1349.
  23. Huang S., Titus S.J., Lakusta T.W., Held, R.J., Ecologically-based individual tree height-diameter models for major Alberta tree species, Alberta Environ. Prot., Land For. Serv., For. Manage. Div., 1994.
  24. Jones J.R., Review and comparison of site evaluation methods, USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. RM-51, 1969.
  25. Kelty M., Cameron I.R., Plot designs for the analysis of species interactions in mixed stands, Commonw. For. Rev. 74 (1995) 322-332.
  26. Kucharik C.J., Norman J.M., Gower S.T., Characterization of radiation regimes in nonrandom forest canopies: theory, measurements, and a simplified modeling approach, Tree Physiol. 19 (1999) 695-706 [PubMed].
  27. Larocque G.R., Examining different concepts for the development of a distance-dependent competition model for red pine diameter growth using long-term stand data differing in initial stand density, For. Sci. 48 (2002) 24-34.
  28. Lazaruk L.W., Kernaghan G., Macdonald S.E., Khasa D., Effects of partial cutting on the ectomycorrhizae of Picea glauca forests in northwestern Alberta, Can. J. For. Res. 35 (2005) 1442-1454 [CrossRef].
  29. Lieffers V.J., Beck. J.A., A seminatural approach to mixedwood management in the prairie provinces, For. Chron. 70 (1994) 260-264.
  30. Lieffers V.J., Macmillan R.B., MacPherson D., Branter K., Stewart J.D., Semi-natural and intensive silvicultural systems for the boreal mixedwood forest, For. Chron. 72 (1996) 286-292.
  31. Lieffers V.J., Stadt K.J., Growth of understory Picea glauca, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Epilobium angustifolium in relation to overstory light transmission, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 1193-1198.
  32. Lin J.Y., Stand growth simulation models for Douglas-fir and western hemlock in the northwestern United States, in: Fries J. (Ed.), Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation, Royal Coll. For., Stockholm, 1974, pp. 102-118.
  33. Lorimer C.G., Tests of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stands, For. Ecol. Manage. 6 (1983) 343-360 [CrossRef].
  34. MacPherson D.M., Lieffers V.J., Blenis P.V., Productivity of aspen stands with and without a spruce understory in Alberta's boreal mixedwood forests, For. Chron. 77 (2001) 351-356.
  35. Man R.Z., Lieffers V.J., Effects of shelterwood and site preparation on microclimate and establishment of white spruce seedlings in a boreal mixedwood forest, For Chron. 75 (1999) 837-844.
  36. Martin G.L., Ek A.R., A comparison of competition measures and growth models for predicting plantation red pine diameter and height growth, For. Sci. 30 (1984) 731-743.
  37. Navratil S., MacIsaac D.A., Juvenile growth of white spruce and deciduous competition on mixedwood sites in Alberta, Can. For. Serv., PAF Rep. 141, 1996.
  38. Peters V.S., MacDonald S.E., Dale M.R.T., The interaction between masting and fire is key to white spruce regeneration, Ecology 86 (2005) 1744-1750 [CrossRef].
  39. Rawlings J.O., Pantula S.G., Dickey D.A., Applied regression analysis: a research tool, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
  40. Robinson A. P., Ek A.R., The consequences of hierarchy for modeling in forest ecosystems, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 1837-1846 [CrossRef].
  41. Rowe J.S., Forest Regions of Canada, Can. Forestry Serv. Pub. No. 1300, Information Canada, Ottawa, 1972.
  42. Simard S.W., Perry D.A., Jones M.D., Myrold D.D., Durall D.M., and Molina R., Net transfer of carbon between trees species with shared ectomycorrhizal fungi, Nature 388 (1997) 579-582 [CrossRef].
  43. Smolander S., Stenberg P., A method for estimating light interception by a conifer shoot, Tree Physiol. 21 (2001) 797-803 [PubMed].
  44. Soares P., Tomé M., Distance-dependent competition measures for eucalyptus plantations in Portugal, Ann. For. Sci. 56 (1999) 307-319.
  45. Stadt, K.J., Modeling light for regeneration planning in mixed-species boreal forests, Ph.D. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, 2002.
  46. Stadt K.J., Lieffers V.J., MIXLIGHT: A flexible light transmission model for mixed-species forest stands, Agric. For. Meteorol. 102 (2000) 235-252 [CrossRef].
  47. Stadt K.J., Lieffers V.J., Hall R.J., Messier C., Spatially explicit modeling of PAR transmission and growth of Picea glauca and Abies balsamea in the boreal forests of Alberta and Quebec, Can. J. For. Res. 35 (2005) 1-12 [CrossRef].
  48. Ter-Mikaelian M.T., Wagner R.G., Bell F.W., Shropshire C., Comparison of photosynthetically active radiation and cover estimation for measuring the effects of interspecific competition on jack pine seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 883-889 [CrossRef].
  49. Tomé M., Burkhart H.E., Distance-dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees, For. Sci. 35 (1989) 816-831.
  50. Vettenranta J., Distance-dependent models for predicting the development of mixed coniferous forests in Finland, Silva Fenn. 33 (1999): 51-72.
  51. Wimberly M., Bare B.B., Distance-dependent and distance-independent models of Douglas-fir and western hemlock basal area growth following silvicultural treatment, For. Ecol. Manage. 89 (1996) 1-11 [CrossRef].