EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 64 / No 6 (September 2007) Ann. For. Sci., 64 6 (2007) 585-591 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 64, Number 6, September 2007
Page(s) 585 - 591
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007036
Published online 06 September 2007
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 64 (2007) 585-591
  1. Beard J.S., An experiment on burning in wattle culture, J. S. Afr. For. Assoc. 20 (1951) 53-77.
  2. Çamdevýren H., Demýr N., Kanik A., Keskýn S., Use of principle component scores in multiple linear regression models for prediction of Chlorophyll-a in reservoirs, Ecol. Model. 181 (2005) 581-589 [CrossRef].
  3. Dupouey J.L., Dambrine E., Laffite J.D., Moares C., Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity, Ecol. 83 (2002) 2978-2984.
  4. Duryea M.L., English R.J., Hermansen L.A., A comparison of landscape mulches: chemical, allelopathic, and decomposition properties, J. Arbor. 25 (1999) 88-97.
  5. DWAF, Report on commercial timber resources and primary roundwood processing in South Africa 2001/2002, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Forestry Technical and Information Services, Pretoria, 2002.
  6. Endo M., Wright J.A., Growth of a Eucalyptus grandis plantation under different levels of competing vegetation control, in: Gjerstad D.H. (Ed.), Ecology, practice and policy, Proceedings of the International Conference on Forest Vegetation Management, Auburn, USA, 1992, pp. 168-176.
  7. Griffith J.A., Site quality and the competition between weeds and planted seedlings in relation to weeding, N. Z. J. For. Sci. 26 (1996) 118-125.
  8. Haywood J.D., Goelz J.C., Sword Sayer M.A., Tiarks A.E., Influence of fertilization, weed control, and pine litter on loblolly pine growth and productivity and understory plant development through 12 growing seasons, Can. J. For. Res. 33 (2003) 1974-1982 [CrossRef].
  9. Jarvel L., Pallett R., Weed composition in relation to site in re-established pine compartments on the Mpumalanga escarpment, South Africa, S. Afr. For. J. 196 (2002) 15-20.
  10. Johnson D.E., Applied multivariate methods for data analysts, Duxberry Press, California, 1998, pp. 93-118.
  11. Lane P.W., Payne R.W., Genstat for Windows, London, The Numerical Algorithms Group, 1996.
  12. Little K.M., The response of a Eucalyptus hybrid clone to weed control and burning, in: Run-Peng Wei (Ed.), Eucalyptus plantations: Research, Management and Development, Proceedings of the international symposium, Guangzhou, China, 1-6 September 2002, Singapore, Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2003, pp. 338-351.
  13. Little K.M., du Toit B., Esprey L.J., Competitive interactions between grasses or broadleaves and early P. greggii growth, in: Frochot H., Collet C., Balandier P. (Eds.), Popular Summaries from the Fourth International Conference on Forest Vegetation Management, Nancy, France, 17-21 June 2002, INRA, Champenoux, France, 2002, pp. 220-222.
  14. Little K.M., Rolando C.A., The impact of vegetation management on pine establishment in the summer rainfall region of South Africa, S. Afr. For. J. 192 (2001) 31-39.
  15. Little K.M., Schumann A.W., A new systematic trial design for the optimization of interspecific weed control, in: Sheperd R.C.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference, Melbourne, Australia, Weed Science Society of Victoria Inc., Victoria, Australia, 1996, pp. 440-444.
  16. Little K.M., Smith C.W., Norris C.H., The influence of various methods of plantation residue management on replanted Acacia mearnsii growth, Aus. For. 63 (2000) 226-234.
  17. Little K.M., van Staden J., Interspecific competition affects early growth of a Eucalyptus grandis $\times$ E. camaldulensis hybrid clone in Zululand, South Africa, S. Afr. J. Bot. 69 (2003) 505-513.
  18. Little K.M., van Staden J., Clarke J.P.Y., The relationship between vegetation management and the wood and pulping properties of a Eucalyptus hybrid clone, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 673-680 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  19. Lundgren M.R., Small C.J., Dreyer D.G., Influence of land use and site characteristics on invasive plant abundance in the Quinebaug Highlands of Southern New England, Northeastern-Naturalist 11 (2004) 313-332 [CrossRef].
  20. Masson P., Forest weed associations and their relation to land type. Research Document 13/93. Usutu Pulp Company, SAPPI, Swaziland, 1993, 35 p.
  21. McConway K.J., Jones M.C., Taylor P.C., Statistical Modelling using Genstat7. London, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 150-155.
  22. Miller J.H., Pine plantation communities: how do we begin to manage for plant diversity? in: New century: new opportunities, Proceedings, 54th annual Southern Weed Science Society meeting, 2001, January 22-24, Biloxi, Mississippi, Southern Weed Science Society, 2001, pp. 215-219.
  23. Odgers B.M., Fire, buried germinable seed banks and grass species establishment in an urban eucalypt forest reserve, Aus. J. Bot. 44 (1996) 413-419.
  24. Ohlemuller R., Walker S., Wilson J.B., Local versus regional factors as determinants of the invisibility of indigenous forest fragments by alien plant species, Oikos 112 (2006) 493-501.
  25. Schulze R.E., South African atlas of agrohydrology and climatology, Water Research Commission Report, TT82/96, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, 1997, 276 p.
  26. Schumann A.W., Little K.M., Eccles N.S., Suppression of seed germination and early seedling growth by plantation harvest residues, S. Afr. J. Plant Soil, 12 (1995) 170-172.
  27. Shelbourne C.J.A., Bulloch B.T., Low C.B., McConnochie R.M., Performance to age 22 years of 49 eucalypts in the Wairapapa district, New Zealand, and review of results from other trials, N. Z. J. For. Sci. 32 (2002) 256-278.
  28. Small C.J., Mc Carthy B.C., Spatial and temporal variability of herbaceous vegetation in an eastern deciduous forest, Plant Ecol. 164 (2002) 37-48 [CrossRef].
  29. Swain T.L., Gardner R.A.W., Cold tolerant eucalypts in South Africa - growth information for informed site-species matching in SA, S. Afr. For. J. 202 (2004) 83-84.
  30. Taverna K., Peet R.K., Phillips L.C., Long-term change in ground-layer vegetation of deciduous forests of North Carolina Piedmont, USA, J. Ecol. 93 (2005) 202-213.
  31. Urretavizcaya M.F., Defossé G.E., Gonda, H.E., Sort-term effects of fire on plant cover and soil conditions in two Austrocedrus chilensis (cypress) forests in Patagonia, Argentina, Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 63-71 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  32. van Heerden F., Masson P.H., Weed species in newly generated pine plantations in the Eastern and Northern Transvaal: Factors affecting their distribution and abundance, CSIR Research Report, Pretoria, 1991, 84 p.
  33. Wagner R.G., Little K.M., Richardson B., McNabb K., The role of vegetation management for enhancing productivity of the world's forests, Forestry, 79 (2006) 57-79.
  34. Whittingham M.J., Stephens P.A., Bradbury R.B., Freckleton R.P., Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? J. Anim. Ecol. 75 (2006) 1182-1189 [PubMed].
  35. Windeballe B.S., Svenning J.C., Balslev H., The influence of past land-use on understorey plant distributions in a near natural deciduous forest in Denmark, Nordic J. Bot. 23 (2004) 69-81.
  36. Zutter B.R., Nelson L.R., Minogue P.J., Gjerstad D.H., Hardwood plantation growth following weed control using herbicides and cultivation, S. J. Appl. For. 11 (1987) 134-138.