Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 65, Number 6, September 2008
Article Number 603
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 04 September 2008
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 65 (2008) 603
  1. Cerli C., Celi L., Johansson M.-B., Kogel-Knabner I., Rosenquist L., and Zanini E., 2006. Soil organic matter changes in a spruce chronosequence on Swedish former agricultural soil: I. Carbon and lignin dynamics. Soil Sci. 171: 837–849.
  2. Cerny M., 2005. Use of the growth models of main tree species of the Czech Republic in combination with the data of the Czech National Forest Inventory. In: Neuhöferová P. (Ed.), The growth functions in forestry, Korf's growth function and its use in forestry and world reputation, Kostelec nad Èernými lesy, Prague, Czech University of Agriculture Prague, ISBN 80-213-1331-5 (in Czech).
  3. Cienciala E., Apltauer J., Cerny M., and Exnerova Z., 2005. Biomass functions applicable for European beech, J. For. Sci. (Prague) 51: 147–154.
  4. Cienciala E., Exnerova Z., Macku J., and Henzlik V., 2006. Forest topsoil organic carbon content in Southwest Bohemia region. J. For. Sci. (Prague) 52: 387–398.
  5. Cienciala E., Cerny M., Tatarinov F., Apltauer A., and Exnerova Z., 2006. Biomass functions applicable to Scots pine. Trees 20: 483–495 [CrossRef].
  6. Cienciala E., Apltauer J., Exnerova Z., and Tatarinov F., 2008a. Biomass functions applicable to oak trees grown in Central-European forestry. J. For. Sci. (Prague) 54: 109–120.
  7. Cienciala E., Tomppo E., Snorrason A., Broadmeadow M., Colin A., Dungler K., Exnerova Z., Lassere B., Petersson H., Priwitzer T., Sanchez Pena G., and Stahl G., 2008b. Preparing reporting systems for LULUCF: use of National Forest Inventories in European countries. Silva Fenn. 42: 73–88.
  8. Curtis P.S., Hanson P.J., Bolstad P., Barford C., Randolph J.C., Schmid H.P., and Wilson K.B., 2002. Biometric and eddy-covariance based estimates of annual carbon storage in five eastern North American deciduous forests. Agric. For. Meteorol. 113: 3–19 [CrossRef].
  9. IPCC, 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan, ISBN 4-88788-003-0.
  10. Kaipainen T., Liski J., Pussinen A., and Karjalainen T., 2004. Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environ. Sci. Pollut. 7: 205–219 [CrossRef].
  11. Kauppi P.E., Mielikainen K., and Kuusela K., 1992. Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971 to 1990. Science 256: 70–74 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  12. Kramer K. and Mohren G.M.J., 2001. Long-term effects of climate change on carbon budgets of forests in Europe, Final Report of LTEEF II. Report 194, Alterra, Wageningen.
  13. Kramer K., Leinonen I., Bartelink H.H., Berbigier P., Borghetti M., Bernhofer C., Cienciala E., Dolman A.J., Froer O., Gracia C.A., Granier A., Grunwald T., Hari P., Jans W., Kellomaki S., Loustau D., Magnani F., Markkanen T., Matteucci G., Mohren G.M.J., Moors E., Nissinen A., Peltola H., Sabate S., Sanchez A., Sontag M., Valentini R., and Vesala T., 2002. Evaluation of six process-based forest growth models using eddy-covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at six forest sites in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 8: 213–230 [CrossRef].
  14. Lagergren F., Grelle A., Lankreijer H., Molder M., and Lindroth A., 2006. Current carbon balance of the forested area in sweden and its sensitivity to global change as simulated by Biome-BGC. Ecosystems 9: 894–908 [CrossRef]
  15. Lehtonen A., Cienciala E., Tatarinov F., and Makipaa R., 2007. Uncertainty estimation of biomass expansion factors for Norway spruce in the Czech Republic. Ann. For. Sci. 64: 133–140 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  16. Lettens S., Orshoven J., Wesemael B., Muys B., and Perrin D., 2005. Soil organic carbon changes in landscape units of Belgium between 1960 and 2000 with reference to 1990. Glob. Change Biol. 11: 2128–2140 [CrossRef].
  17. Liski J., Lehtonen A., Palosuo T., Peltoniemi M., Eggers T., Muukkonen P., and Makipaa R., 2006. Carbon accumulation in Finland's forests 1922–2004 - an estimate obtained by combination of forest inventory data with modelling of biomass, litter and soil. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 687–697 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  18. Liski J., Palosuo T., Peltoniemi M., and Sievanen R., 2005. Carbon and decomposition model Yasso for forest soils. Ecol. Model. 189: 168–182 [CrossRef].
  19. MA, 2001. Report on Forestry of the Czech Republic by December 31, 2000. Published by the Czech Ministry of Agriculture (in Czech).
  20. MA, 2006. Report on the State of Forests and Forestry in the Czech Republic by 2005. Published by the Czech Ministry of Agriculture (in Czech).
  21. Morari F., Lugato E., Berti A., and Giardini L., 2006. Long-term effects of recommended management practices on soil carbon changes and sequestration in north-eastern Italy. Soil Use Manage. 22: 71–81 [CrossRef].
  22. Muukkonen P., 2005. Needle litter production rates of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) derived from the needle-shed dynamics. Trees Struct. Funct. 19: 273–279.
  23. Muukkonen P. and Lehtonen A., 2006. Needle and branch biomass turnover rates of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Can. J. For. Res. 3: 2517–2527.
  24. Nabuurs G.-J., Paivinen R., and Schanz H., 2001. Sustainable management regimes for Europe's forests – a projection with EFISCEN till 2050. For. Pol. Econ. 3: 155–173.
  25. Nabuurs G.-J., Pussinen A., Karjalainen T., Erhard M., and Kramer K., 2002. Stemwood volume increment changes in European forests due to climate change – a simulation study with the EFISCEN model. Glob. Change Biol. 8: 1–13 [CrossRef].
  26. Palosuo T., Liski J., Trofymow J.A., and Titus B.D., 2005. Litter decomposition affected by climate and litter quality - Testing the Yasso model with litterbag data from the Canadian intersite decomposition experiment. Ecol. Model. 189: 183–198 [CrossRef].
  27. Peltoniemi M., Palosuo T., Monni S., and Makipaa R. 2006. Factors affecting the uncertainty of sinks and stocks of carbon in Finnish forests soils and vegetation. For. Ecol. Manage. 232: 75–85.
  28. Plíva K., 1991. Funkcne integrovane lesni hospodarstvi, UHUL, Brandys n. Labem.
  29. Plíva K. and Zlábek I., 1986. Prirodni lesni oblasti CSR, Czech Ministry of Forest and Water Management, SZN, Prague, 316 p.
  30. Pussinen A., Schelhaas M.J., Verkaik E., Heikkinen E., Liski J., Karjalainen T., Paivinen R., and Naaburs G.J., 2001. Manual for the European Forest Information Scenario Model (EFISCEN 2.0). EFI Internal Report No. 5.
  31. Sallnas O., 1990. A matrix growth model of the Swedish forest. Studia Forestalia Suecica No. 183, Swedish Univ. Agr. Sci, Faculty of Forestry, Uppsala, 23 p.
  32. Schelhaas M.J., 2008. Impacts of natural disturbances on the development of European forest resources: application of model approaches from tree and stand levels to large-scale scenarios. Dissertationes Forestales 56, Alterra Scientific Contributions 23.
  33. Schelhaas M.-J., Nabuurs G.J., Sonntag M., and Pussinen A., 2002. Adding natural disturbances to a large-scale forest scenario model and a case study for Switzerland. For. Ecol. Manage. 167: 13–26 [CrossRef].
  34. Schelhaas M.J., Cerny M., Buksha I.F., Cienciala E., Csoka P., Karjalainen T., Kolozs L., Nabuurs G.J., Pasternak V., Pussinen A., Sodor M., and Wawrzoniak J., 2004. Scenarios on forest management in Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Ukraine, European Forest Institute Research Report 17, Brill, Leiden, Boston, Köln.
  35. Schelhaas M.J., van Brusselen J., Pussinen A., Pesonen E., Schuck A., Nabuurs G.J., and Sasse V., 2006. Outlook for the Development of European Forest Resources. A study prepared for the European Forest Sector Outlook Study (EFSOS), Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Paper, ECE/TIM/DP/41, UN-ECE, Geneva, 118 p.
  36. Rihm B., 2007. Switzerland's Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2005, National Inventory Report 2007, Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Federal Office of the Environment FOEN, 292 p.
  37. Thürig E., 2005. Carbon budget of Swiss forests: evaluation and application of empirical models for assessing future management impacts, A dissertation No. 15872 submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ).
  38. Thürig E. and Schelhaas M.-J., 2006. Evaluation of a large-scale forest scenario model in heterogenous forests: a case study for Switzerland, Can. J. For. Res. 36: 671–683.
  39. Vande Walle I., Van Camp N., Perrin D., Lemeur R., Verheyen K., Van Wesemael B., and Laitat E., 2005. Growing stock-based assessment of the carbon sock in the Belgian forest biomass. Ann. For. Sci. 62: 853–864 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  40. Wirth C., Schumacher J., and Schulze E.-D., 2004. Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe – a-meta-analysis approach toward prediction and uncertainty estimation. Tree Physiol. 24: 121–139 [PubMed].