Free Access
| Issue |
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 65, Number 8, December 2008
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 812 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008071 | |
| Published online | 04 December 2008 | |
References of
Ann. For. Sci. 65 (2008) 812
- AFNOR, 2007. NF B 52001 – Regulations governing the use of timber in structure – Visual classification for the use of the main coniferous and deciduous wood types in structures.
- Blass H.J. and Frese M., 2004. Combined visual and machine strength grading. Holz Roh-Werkst. 62: 325–334 [CrossRef].
- Boström L., 1994. Machine strength grading. Comparison of four different systems. SP Report, 49.
- CEN, 2005. EN14081 – Timber structures – Strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section.
- CEN, 2004. EN 384 – Structural timber. Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties and density.
- CEN, 2003. EN338 – Structural Timber – Strength classes.
- CEN, 1998. EN1912 – Structural timber – Strength classes – Assignment of visual grades and species.
- CEN, 1995. EN408 – Timber structures – Structural timber and glued laminated timber – Determination of some physical and mechanical properties.
- CEN, 1995. EN518 – Structural timber – Grading – Requirements for visual strength grading standards.
- CTBA, 1986. Le Douglas. Cahier du Centre Technique du Bois et de l'Ameublement, 118: 85–94.
- Hanhijärvi A., Ranta-Maunus A., and Turk G., 2005. Potential of strength grading of timber with combined measurement techniques. Espoo, VTT Publications, 568, 88p.
- Kretschmann D. and Hernandez R., 2006. Grading timber and glued structural members. In: Walker J. (Ed.), Primary wood processing 2nd ed., pp. 339–390.
- Lanvin J.D., 2005. Vers une optimisation du classement pour la résistance des fortes sections Douglas. DOUGLAS Infos, 11.
- Lycken A., 2005. Comparison between automatic and manual quality grading of sawn softwood. For. Prod. J. 56: 13–18.
- Renaudin P. and Breysse D., 1998. Anatomic parameters and failure behaviour in spruce lumber. Mat. Stru. 32: 311–318 [CrossRef].
- Rouger F. and Guinard D., 2005. Is Scandinavian timber superior to French timber: A close scrutiny. Rev. For. Fr. 57: 85–94.