Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 65, Number 8, December 2008
Article Number 812
Number of page(s) 4
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008071
Published online 04 December 2008
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 65 (2008) 812
  1. AFNOR, 2007. NF B 52001 – Regulations governing the use of timber in structure – Visual classification for the use of the main coniferous and deciduous wood types in structures.
  2. Blass H.J. and Frese M., 2004. Combined visual and machine strength grading. Holz Roh-Werkst. 62: 325–334 [CrossRef].
  3. Boström L., 1994. Machine strength grading. Comparison of four different systems. SP Report, 49.
  4. CEN, 2005. EN14081 – Timber structures – Strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section.
  5. CEN, 2004. EN 384 – Structural timber. Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties and density.
  6. CEN, 2003. EN338 – Structural Timber – Strength classes.
  7. CEN, 1998. EN1912 – Structural timber – Strength classes – Assignment of visual grades and species.
  8. CEN, 1995. EN408 – Timber structures – Structural timber and glued laminated timber – Determination of some physical and mechanical properties.
  9. CEN, 1995. EN518 – Structural timber – Grading – Requirements for visual strength grading standards.
  10. CTBA, 1986. Le Douglas. Cahier du Centre Technique du Bois et de l'Ameublement, 118: 85–94.
  11. Hanhijärvi A., Ranta-Maunus A., and Turk G., 2005. Potential of strength grading of timber with combined measurement techniques. Espoo, VTT Publications, 568, 88p.
  12. Kretschmann D. and Hernandez R., 2006. Grading timber and glued structural members. In: Walker J. (Ed.), Primary wood processing 2nd ed., pp. 339–390.
  13. Lanvin J.D., 2005. Vers une optimisation du classement pour la résistance des fortes sections Douglas. DOUGLAS Infos, 11.
  14. Lycken A., 2005. Comparison between automatic and manual quality grading of sawn softwood. For. Prod. J. 56: 13–18.
  15. Renaudin P. and Breysse D., 1998. Anatomic parameters and failure behaviour in spruce lumber. Mat. Stru. 32: 311–318 [CrossRef].
  16. Rouger F. and Guinard D., 2005. Is Scandinavian timber superior to French timber: A close scrutiny. Rev. For. Fr. 57: 85–94.