EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 67 / No 7 (October-November 2010) Ann. For. Sci., 67 7 (2010) 702 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 7, October-November 2010
Article Number 702
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010027
Published online 05 October 2010
  • Aldrich P.R. and Hamrick J.L., 1998. Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science 281: 103–105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aldrich P.R.,Parker G.R.,Michler C.H., and Romero-Severson J., 2003. Whole-tree silvic identifications and the microsatellite genetic structure of a red oak species complex in an Indiana old-growth forest. Can. J. For. Res.-Rev. Can. Rech. For. 33: 2228–2237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aldrich P.R.,Parker G.R.,Romero-Severson J., and Michler C.H., 2005. Confirmation of oak recruitment failure in Indiana old-growth forest: 75 years of data. For. Sci. 51: 406–416. [Google Scholar]
  • Angers V.A.,Messier C.,Beaudet M., and Leduc A., 2005. Comparing composition and structure in old-growth and harvested (selection and diameter-limit cuts) northern hardwood stands in Quebec. For. Ecol. Manage. 217: 275–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bacles C.F.E.,Burczyk J.,Lowe A.J., and Ennos R.A., 2005. Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution 59: 979–990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beineke W.F. 1974. Recent changes in the population structure of black walnut. In: R.B. Polk (ed.), Proceedings, Eighth Central States Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 43–46. University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA, [Google Scholar]
  • Bekessy S.A.,Ennos R.A.,Burgman M.A.,Newton A.C., and Ades P.K., 2003. Neutral DNA markers fail to detect genetic divergence in an ecologically important trait. Biol. Conserv. 110: 267–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boshier D.H., 2000. Mating systems. In: Young A., Boshier D., and Boyle T. (Eds.), Forest Conservation Genetics. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp. 63–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Bratkovich S., Gallion J., Leatherberry E., Hoover W., Reading W., and Durham G., 2004. Forests of Indiana: their economic importance. In: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, St Paul, MN, pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Buchert G.P.,Rajora O.P.,Hood J.V., and Dancik B.P., 1997. Effects of harvesting on genetic diversity in old growth eastern white pine in Ontario, Canada. Conserv. Biol. 11: 747–758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Busov V.B.,Rink G., and Woeste K., 2002. Allozyme variation and mating system of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) in the Central Hardwood region of the United States. For. Genet. 9: 319–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Clatterbuck W.K. 2006. Treatments for improving degraded hardwood stands. Professional Hardwood Notes #6. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Extension SP680, 12 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Collevatti R.G.,Grattapaglia D., and Hay J.D., 2001. Population genetic structure of the endangered tropical tree species Caryocar brasiliense, based on variability at microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 10: 349–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dow B.D. and Ashley M.V., 1996. Microsatellites analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol. Ecol. 5: 615–627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dow B.D. and Ashley M.V., 1998. Factors influencing male mating success in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. New For. 15: 161–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Finkeldey R. and Ziehe M., 2004. Genetic implications of silvicultural regimes. For. Ecol. Manage. 197: 231–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Glaubitz J.C., Robichaud R.L., Woeste K., Olin E., and Rhodes J., 2004. Toward guidelines for harvest intensities with minimal impact upon retained genetic diversity in Central Hardwood tree species. In: Proceedings of the 14th Central Hardwoods Forest Conference. US Department of Agricultural, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-316, Wooster, OH March 16–19, pp. 395–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Glaubitz J.C.,Wu H.X., and Moran G.F., 2003. Impacts of silviculture on genetic diversity in the native forest species Eucalyptus sieberi. Conserv. Genet. 4: 275–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hamrick J.L. and Nason J.D., 2000. Gene flow in forest trees. In: Young A., Boshier D., Boyle T. (Eds.), Forest conservation genetics. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp. 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Hawley G.J.,Schaberg P.G.,DeHayes D.H., and Brissette J.C., 2005. Silviculture alters the genetic structure of an eastern hemlock forest in Maine, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 143–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Imbert E. and Lefevre F., 2003. Dispersal and gene flow of Populus nigra (Salicaceae) along a dynamic river system. J. Ecol. 91: 447–456. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones A.G. and Ardren W.R., 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 12: 2511–2523. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelty M.J.,Kittredge D.B.,Kyker-Snowman T., and Leighton A.D., 2003. The conversion of even-aged stands to uneven-aged structure in southern New England. North. J. Appl. For. 20: 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Kenefic L.S.,Sendak P.E., and Brissette J.C., 2005. Comparison of fixed diameter-limit and selection cutting in northern conifers. North. J. Appl. For. 22: 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C.-T.,Wickneswari R.,Mahani M.C., and Zakri A.H., 2002. Effect of selective logging on the genetic diversity of Scaphium macropodum. Biol. Conserv. 104: 107–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lefort F. and Douglas G.C., 1999. An efficient micro-method of DNA isolation from mature leaves of four hardwood tree species Acer, Fraxinus, Prunus and Quercus. Ann. For. Sci. 56: 259–263. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lewis P.O. and Zaykins D., 2001. Genetic data analysis: Computer program for the analysis of allelic data. In: p. Free program distributed by the authors over the internet from http:lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Marquardt P.E. and Epperson B.K., 2004. Spatial and population genetic structure of microsatellites in white pine. Mol. Ecol. 13: 3305–3315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McGuire M.,Stevens J., and Potter-Witter K., 1999. Assessing scarcity of the north central veneer log resource. North. J. Appl. For. 16: 160–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Murawski D.A.,Gunatilleke I., and Bawa K.S., 1994. The effects of selective logging on inbreeding in Shorea megistophylla (Dipterocarpaceae) from Sri-Lanka. Conserv. Biol. 8: 997–1002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Namkoong G., Koshy M.P., and Aiken S., 2000. Selection. In: Young A., Boshier D., and Boyle T. (Eds.), Forest conservation genetics. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp. 101–111. [Google Scholar]
  • Neale D.B., 1985. Genetic implications of shelterwood regeneration of Douglas-fir in southwest Oregon. For. Sci. 31: 995–1005. [Google Scholar]
  • Nei M., 1973. Analysis of Gene Diversity in Subdivided Populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 70: 3321–3323. [Google Scholar]
  • Nijensohn S.E.,Schaberg P.G.,Hawley G.J., and DeHayes D.H., 2005. Genetic subpopulation structuring and its implications in a mature eastern white pine stand. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 1041–1052. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nyland R.D., 2005. Diameter-limit cutting and silviculture: A comparison of long-term yields and values for uneven-aged sugar maple stands. North. J. Appl. For. 22: 111–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Obayashi K.,Tsumura Y.,Ihara-Ujino T.,Niiyama K.,Tanouchi H.,Suyama Y.,Washitani I.,Lee C.T.,Lee S.L., and Muhammad N., 2002. Genetic diversity and outcrossing rate between undisturbed and selectively logged forests of Shorea curtisii (Dipterocarpaceae) using microsatellite DNA analysis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163: 151–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Parker P.G.,Snow A.A.,Schug M.D.,Booton G.C., and Fuerst P.A., 1998. What molecules can tell us about populations: Choosing and using a molecular marker. Ecology 79: 361–382. [Google Scholar]
  • Polito V.S.,Pinney K.,Weinbaum S.,Aradhya M.K.,Dangl J.,Yanknin Y., and Grant J.A., 2005. Walnut pollination dynamics: pollen flow in walnut orchards. Acta Hortic. 705: 465–472. [Google Scholar]
  • Rajora O.P., 1999. Genetic biodiversity impacts of silvicultural practices and phenotypic selection in white spruce. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 954–961. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rajora O.P. and Rahman M.H., 2003. Microsatellite DNA and RAPD fingerprinting, identification and genetic relationships of hybrid poplar (Populus × canadensis) cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 470–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rajora O.P.,Rahman M.H.,Buchert G.P., and Dancik B.P., 2000. Microsatellite DNA analysis of genetic effects of harvesting in old-growth eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) in Ontario, Canada. Mol. Ecol. 9: 339–348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rink G.,Carroll E.R., and Kung F.H., 1989. Estimation of Juglans nigra L. mating system parameters. For. Sci. 35: 623–627. [Google Scholar]
  • Rink G.,Zhang G.,Jinghua Z.,Kung F.H., and Carroll E.R., 1994. Mating parameters in Juglans nigra L. seed orchard similar to natural population estimates. Silvae Genet. 43: 261–263. [Google Scholar]
  • Robichaud R.L.,Glaubitz J.C.,Olin E.,Rhodes J., and Woeste K., 2006. A robust set of black walnut microsatellites for parentage and clonal identification. New For. 32: 179–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sork V.L.,Smouse P.E.,Apsit V.J.,Dyer R.J., and Westfall R.D., 2005. A two-generation analysis of pollen pool genetic structure in flowering dogwood, Cornus florida (Cornaceae), in the Missouri Ozarks. Am. J. Bot. 92: 262–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Streiff R.,Ducousso A.,Lexer C.,Steinkellner H.,Gloessl J., and Kremer A., 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol. Ecol. 8: 831–841. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tormoehlen B., Gallion J., and Schmidt T.L., 2000. Forests of Indiana: a 1998 overview. In: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, St Paul, MN, pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Tritton L.M. and Sendak P.E., 1995. Ecological aspects of forest management planning: a Northern hardwood forest case study. North. J. Appl. For. 12: 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  • Valbuena-Carabana M.,Gonzalez-Martinez S.C.,Sork V.L.,Collada C.,Soto A.,Goicoechea P.G., and Gil L., 2005. Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 95: 457–465. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Schoot J.,Pospiskova M.,Vosman B., and Smulders M.J.M., 2000. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in black poplar (Populus nigra L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 317–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Victory E., Woeste K., and Rhodes O.E. Jr., 2004. History of black walnut genetics research in North America. In: Michler C.H. et al. (Eds.), Black walnut in a new century, proceedings of the 6th Walnut Council research symposium, 2004 July 25–28, Lafayette, IN. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-243. St. Paul, MN: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Victory E.,Glaubitz J.C.,Olin E.,Rhodes J., and Woeste K.E., 2006. Genetic homogeneity in Juglans nigra (Juglandaceae) at nuclear microsatellites. Am. J. Bot. 93, 118–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weir B.S. and Cockerham C.C., 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ziehe M. and Hattemer H.H., 2002. Target-Diameter felling and consequences for genetic structures in a beech stand (Fagus sylvatica L.). In: von Gadow K., Nagel J., and Saborowski J. (Eds.), Continuous cover forestry, assessment, analysis, scenarios. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 91–105. [Google Scholar]