Free Access
Table VII
Estimated parameters and standard errors of the best two models for balsam fir, red spruce, and white pine.
Balsam fir | Red spruce | White pine | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Estimate | std. | CAR | σ | R 2 | Estimate | std. | CAR | σ | R 2 | Estimate | std. | CAR | σ | R 2 | ||||
Kozak (2004) Model 02 | α 0 | 0.911 | 0.015 | 0.718 | 0.827 | 0.984 | 0.940 | 0.017 | 0.743 | 0.861 | 0.983 | 1.057 | 0.025 | 0.840 | 2.416 | 0.982 | ||
α 1 | 1.026 | 0.007 | 0.998 | 0.006 | 0.991 | 0.010 | ||||||||||||
α 2 | –0.005 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.011 | –0.031 | 0.014 | ||||||||||||
β 1 | 0.368 | 0.006 | 0.508 | 0.005 | 0.372 | 0.006 | ||||||||||||
β 2 | –0.645 | 0.045 | –0.636 | 0.038 | –0.824 | 0.048 | ||||||||||||
β 3 | 0.502 | 0.012 | 0.355 | 0.010 | 0.335 | 0.010 | ||||||||||||
β 4 | 1.780 | 0.141 | 1.687 | 0.129 | 4.711 | 0.246 | ||||||||||||
β 5 | 0.096 | 0.002 | 0.078 | 0.002 | 0.112 | 0.002 | ||||||||||||
β 6 | –0.487 | 0.013 | –0.242 | 0.011 | –0.556 | 0.017 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Clark et al. (1991) I | β 1 | 68.258 | 1.186 | 0.836 | 0.792 | 0.984 | 67.542 | 1.128 | 0.843 | 0.830 | 0.982 | 58.278 | 1.183 | 0.916 | 2.613 | 0.972 | ||
β 4 | 1.292 | 0.058 | 1.369 | 0.062 | 1.743 | 0.145 | ||||||||||||
β 5 | 0.702 | 0.004 | 0.696 | 0.004 | 0.730 | 0.003 | ||||||||||||
β 6 | 1.795 | 0.015 | 2.107 | 0.0170 | 2.534 | 0.026 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Clark et al. (1991) II | β 1 | 67.375 | 1.174 | 0.873 | 0.909 | 0.979 | 66.895 | 1.121 | 0.871 | 0.944 | 0.975 | 57.420 | 1.178 | 0.920 | 2.808 | 0.968 | ||
β 4 | 1.218 | 0.060 | 1.211 | 0.063 | 1.526 | 0.144 | ||||||||||||
β 5 | 0.693 | 0.005 | 0.695 | 0.004 | 0.729 | 0.004 | ||||||||||||
β 6 | 1.748 | 0.016 | 2.095 | 0.018 | 2.521 | 0.027 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
θ 1 | 0.8959 | 0.0024 | 0.998 | 0.8804 | 0.0027 | 0.997 | 0.8418 | 0.0023 | 0.997 | |||||||||
θ 2 | –0.8791 | 0.0156 | –0.6849 | 0.0161 | –0.6582 | 0.0315 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Fang et al. (2000) | α 0 | 0.000056 | 0.000002 | 0.9849 | 0.000053 | 0.000002 | 0.9894 | 0.000069 | 0.000003 | 0.9895 | ||||||||
α 1 | 1.8731 | 0.0165 | 1.7869 | 0.0096 | 1.7630 | 0.0136 | ||||||||||||
α 2 | 0.9637 | 0.0251 | 1.0995 | 0.0200 | 1.0352 | 0.0207 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
p1 | 0.0299 | 0.0004 | 0.8476 | 0.5323 | 0.9815 | 0.0230 | 0.0004 | 0.8299 | 0.6938 | 0.9785 | 0.0360 | 0.0004 | 0.8962 | 1.7070 | 0.9769 | |||
p2 | 0.5439 | 0.0033 | 0.6057 | 0.0027 | 0.5989 | 0.0032 | ||||||||||||
β 1 | 0.0457 | 0.0006 | 0.0241 | 0.0010 | 0.0495 | 0.0004 | ||||||||||||
β 2 | 0.0372 | 0.0001 | 0.0393 | 0.0001 | 0.0382 | 0.0001 | ||||||||||||
β 3 | 0.0300 | 0.0001 | 0.0290 | 0.0001 | 0.0301 | 0.0001 |
std.: Standard error of estimated coefficients, CAR: estimated variance-covariance parameter, σ: estimated standard error of residuals.
Clark et al. (1991) I: upper stem diameters at 5.27 m were obtained by linear interpolation.
Clark et al. (1991) II: upper stem diameters at 5.27 m were predicted based on the regression form presented in Clark et al. (1991).