EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 60 / No 8 (December 2003) Ann. For. Sci., 60 8 (2003) 749-756 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 60, Number 8, December 2003
Page(s) 749 - 756
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003069
References of Ann. For. Sci. 60 749-756
  1. Baker F.S., A revised tolerance table, J. For. 47 (1949) 179-181.
  2. Bauhus J., Khanna P.K., Menden N., Aboveground and belowground interactions in mixed plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia Mearnsii, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 1886-1894 [CrossRef].
  3. Beaudet M., Messier C., Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient, Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1998) 1007-1015 [CrossRef].
  4. Beaudet M., Messier C., Hilbert D.W., Lo E., Wang Z., Lechowicz M.J., Leaf and plant level carbon gain in Yellow Birch, Sugar Maple and American Beech seedlings from contrasting forest light environments, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 390-404 [CrossRef].
  5. Bellefleur P., LaRocque G., Compétition pour le rayonnement solaire en début de succession secondaire dans une érablière à bouleau jaune et hêtre, Can. J. For. Res. 13 (1983) 514-521.
  6. Bellefleur P., LaRocque G., Comparaison de la croissance d'espèces ligneuses en milieu ouvert et sous couvert forestier, Can. J. For. Res. 13 (1983) 508-513.
  7. Bellefleur P., Pétillon Y., Expérimentation sur la compétition interspécifique par élimination sélective d'espèces forestières, Can. J. For. Res. 13 (1983) 522-532.
  8. Bonser S.P., Aarssen L., Plastic allometry in young sugar maple (Acer saccharum): adaptive responses to light availability, Am. J. Bot. 81 (1994) 400-406.
  9. Burslem D.F.R.P., Grubb P.J., Turner I.M., Responses to nutrient addition among shade-tolerant tree seedlings of lowland tropical rain forest in Singapore, J. Ecol. 83 (1995) 113-122.
  10. Canham C.D., Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Acer saccharum, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 112 (1985) 134-145.
  11. Canham C.D., Growth and canopy architecture of shade tolerant trees: response to canopy gaps, Ecology 69 (1988) 786-795.
  12. Canham C.D., Different responses to gaps among shade-tolerant tree species, Ecology 70 (1989) 548-550.
  13. Canham C.D., Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Fagus grandifolia, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 117 (1990) 1-7.
  14. Canham C.D., Denslow J.S., Platt W.J., Runkle J.R., Spies T., White P.S., Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests, Can. J. For. Res. 20 (1990) 620-631.
  15. Canham C.D., Berkowitz A.R., Kelly V.R., Lovett G.M., Ollinger S.V., Schnurr J., Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 1521-1530.
  16. Chapin F.S., The mineral nutrition of wild plants, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11 (1980) 233-260 [CrossRef].
  17. Christy E.J., Effect of root competition and shading on growth of suppressed western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), Vegetatio 65 (1986) 21-28.
  18. Coomes D.A., Grubb P.J., Responses of juvenile trees to above- and belowground competition in nutrient-starved Amazonian rain forest, Ecology 79 (1998) 768-782.
  19. Coomes D.A., Grubb P.J., Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments, Ecol. Monogr. 70 (2000) 171-207.
  20. Dalling J.W., Tanner E.V.J., An experimental study on landslides in montane rain forest in Jamaica, J. Ecol. 83 (1995) 55-64.
  21. Denslow J.S., Schultz J.C., Vitousek P.M., Strain B.R., Growth responses of tropical shrubs to treefall gap environments, Ecology 71 (1990) 165-179.
  22. Denslow J.S., Ellison A.M., Sanford R.E., Treefall gap size effects on above- and belowground processes in tropical wet forest, J. Ecol. 86 (1998) 597-609 [CrossRef].
  23. Dillenburg L.R., Whigham D.F., Teramura A.H., Forseth I.N., Effect of below- and aboveground competition from vines Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia on the growth of the tree host Liquidambar styraciflua, Oecologia 93 (1993) 48-54.
  24. Elliott K.J., White A.S., Effects of competition from young northern hardwoods on red pine seedling growth, nutrient use efficiency, and leaf morphology, For. Ecol. Manage. 57 (1993) 233-255.
  25. Ellsworth D.S., Reich P.B., Leaf mass per area, nitrogen content and photosynthetic carbon gain in Acer saccharum seedlings in contrasting forest light environments, Funct. Ecol. 6 (1992) 423-435.
  26. Ellsworth D.S., Reich P.B., Canopy structure and vertical patterns of photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest, Oecologia 96 (1993) 169-178.
  27. Environment Canada., Canadian climate normals, Temperature and precipitation 1951-1980 Québec, Aymospheric Environment Service, Ottawa. 1982.
  28. Erdmann G.G., Betula alleghaniensis Britton, Yellow Birch. Burns R.M., Honkala B.H. (Eds.), Silvics of North America: Hardwood, Vol. 2, Washington, E.U. Forest service, 1990, pp. 133-147.
  29. Finzi A.C., Canham C.D., Sapling growth response to light and nitrogen availability in a southern New England forest, For. Ecol. Manage. 131 (2000) 153-165.
  30. Forcier L.K., Reproductive strategies and the co-occurrence of climax tree species, Science 189 (1975) 808-811.
  31. Fowler N., The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17 (1986) 89-110 [CrossRef].
  32. Gendron F., Messier C., Comeau P.G., Comparison of various methods for estimating the mean growing season percent photosynthetic photon flux density in forest, Agric. For. Meteor. 91 (1998) 55-70.
  33. Gerdol R., Brancaleoni L., Marchesini R., Bragazza L., Nutrient and carbon relations in subalpine dwarf shrubs after neighbour removal or fertilization in northern Italy, Oecologia 130 (2002) 476-483 [CrossRef].
  34. Gleeson S.K., Tilman D., Plant allocation and the multiple limitation hypothesis, Am. Nat. 139 (1992) 1322-1343 [CrossRef].
  35. Godman R.M., Yawney H.W., Tubbs C.H., Acer saccharum March, Sugar Maple, in: Burns R.M., Honkala B.H. (Eds.), Silvics of North America: Hardwoods, Vol. 2, Washington, E.U. Forest service, 1990, pp. 78-91.
  36. Goulet F., Bellefleur P., Leaf morphology plasticity in response to light environment in deciduous tree species and its implication on forest succession, Can. J. For. Res. 16 (1986) 1192-1195.
  37. Grubb P.J., Lee W.G., Kollmann J., Wilson B., Interaction of irradiance and soil nutrient supply on growth of seedlings of ten European tall-shrub species and Fagus sylvatica, J. Ecol. 84 (1996) 827-840.
  38. Holl K.D., Effect of above- and below-ground competition of shrubs and grass on Calophyllium brasiliense (Camb.) seedling growth in abandoned tropical pasture, For. Ecol. Manage. 109 (1998) 187-195.
  39. Horn J.C., Responses of understory tree seedlings to trenching, Am. Nat. 114 (1984) 252-258.
  40. Järderlund A., Zackrisson O., Dahlberg A., Nilsson M.-C., Interference of Vaccinium myrtillus on estabhishment, growth, and nutrition of Picea abies seedlings in a northern boreal site, Can. J. For. Res. 27 (1997) 2017-2025 [CrossRef].
  41. Kadmon R., Plant competition along soil moisture gradients: a field experiment with the desert annual Stipa capensis, J. Ecol. 83 (1995) 253-262.
  42. Latham R.E., Co-occurring tree species change rank in seedling performance with resources varied experimentally, Ecology 73 (1992) 2129-2144.
  43. Lewis S.L., Tanner E.V.J., Effects of above- and belowground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings, Ecology 81 (2000) 2525-2538.
  44. Messier C., Puttonen P., Spatial and temporal variation in the light environment of developing Scots pine stands: the basis for a quick and efficient method of characterizing light, Can. J. For. Res. 25 (1995) 343-354.
  45. Newman E.I., Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation, Nature 244 (1973) 244-310.
  46. Ostertag R., Belowground effects of canopy gaps in a tropical wet forest, Ecology 79 (1998) 1294-1304.
  47. Pacala S.W., Canham C.D., Silander J.A. Jr., Kobe R.K., Sapling growth as a function of resources in a north temperate forest, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 2172-2183.
  48. Pantastico-Caldas M., Venable D.L., Competition in two species of desert annuals along a topographic gradient, Ecology 74 (1993) 2192-2203.
  49. Parent S., Messier C., A simple and efficient method to estimate microsite light availability under a forest canopy, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 151-154.
  50. Peace W.J.H., Grubb P.J., Interaction of light an mineral nutrient supply in the growth of Impatiens parviflora, New Phytol. 90 (1982) 127-150.
  51. Putz F.E., Canham C.D., Mechanisms of arrested succession in shrublands: root and shoot competition between shrubs and tree seedlings, For. Ecol. Manage. 49 (1992) 267-275.
  52. Riegel G.M., Miller R.F., Krueger W.C., The effect of aboveground and belowground competition on understory species composition in a Pinus ponderosa forest, For. Sci. 41 (1995) 864-889.
  53. Tilman D., Mechanisms of competition for nutrients and light, in: Tilman D. (Ed.), Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities, Princeton Academic Press Ed., Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988, pp. 52-97.
  54. Tubbs C.H., Houston D.R., Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. American beech, in: Burns R.M., Honkala B.H. (Eds.), Silvics of North America: Hardwoods, Vol. 2, Washington, E.U. Forest service, 1990, pp. 325-332.
  55. Wilson J.B., Shoot competition and root competition, J. Appl. Ecol. 25 (1988) 279-296.
  56. Wilson S.D., Competition and resource availability in heath and grassland in the snowy mountains of Australia, J. Ecol. 81 (1993) 445-451.