Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 61, Number 8, December 2004
Page(s) 843 - 845
References of Ann. For. Sci. 61 843-845
  1. Bonga J.M., von Aderkas P., Rejuvenation of tissues from mature conifers and its implications for propagation in vitro, in: Ahuja M.R., Libby W.J. (Eds.), Clonal Forestry, Vol. 1, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1993, pp. 182-200.
  2. Bonga J.M., von Aderkas P., Influencing micropropagation and somatic embryogenesis in mature trees by manipulation of phase change, stress and culture environment, Tree Physiol. 20 (2000) 921-928 [PubMed].
  3. Ewald D., Kretzschmar U., The influence of micrografting in vitro on tissue culture behavior and vegetative propagation of old European larch trees, Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 44 (1996) 249-252 [CrossRef].
  4. Fraga M., Cañal M.J., Aragonés A., Rodríguez R., Factors involved in Pinus radiata D. Don. micrografting, Ann. For. Sci. 59 (2002) 155-161 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  5. Jonard R., Micrografting and its applications to tree improvement, in: Bajaj Y.P.S. (Ed.), Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, Vol. 1, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1986, pp. 31-48.
  6. Humara J.M., Marín M.S., Parra F., Ordás R.J., Improved efficiency of uidA gene transfer in stone pine (Pinus pinea) cotyledons using a modified binary vector, Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999) 1627-1632 [CrossRef].
  7. Lloyd G.B., McCown B.H., Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture, Proc. Inter. Plant Prop. Soc. 30 (1980) 421-427.
  8. Mutke S., Gordo J., Gil L., The stone pine breeding program in Castile-Leon (central Spain), FAO-CIHEAM Nucis Newsletter, 9 (2000) 50-55.
  9. Monteuuis O., Effect of technique and darkness on the success of meristem micrografting of Picea abies, Silvae Genet. 43 (1994) 91-95.
  10. Ordás R.J., Tavazza R., Ancora G., In Vitro morphogenesis in the globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.), Plant Sci. 71 (1990) 233-237 [CrossRef].