EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 62 / No 2 (March 2005) Ann. For. Sci., 62 2 (2005) 135-142 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 62, Number 2, March 2005
Page(s) 135 - 142
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005005
References of Ann. For. Sci. 62 135-142
  1. Ammer U., Implications of the results of research on dead wood for forestry practice, Forstwiss. Centralbl. 110 (1991) 149-157.
  2. Andersson L.I., Hytteborn H., Bryophytes and decaying wood: a comparison between managed and natural forest, Holarc. Ecol. 14 (1991) 121-130.
  3. Barthod C., Les Indicateurs de gestion durable des forêts françaises, Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche, Paris, 2000.
  4. Benichou P., Le Breton O., Prise en compte de la topographie pour la cartographie des champs pluviométriques statistiques, Météorologie 19 (1987) 25-42.
  5. Blondel J., Biogéographie. Approche écologique et évolutive, Masson, Paris, 1995.
  6. Bobiec A., Living stands and dead wood in the Bialowieza forest: suggestions for restoration management, For. Ecol. Manage. 165 (2002) 125-140.
  7. Bormann F.H., Likens G.E., Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem, Springer-Verlag, New-York, 1994.
  8. Bull E.L., Parks C.G., Torgersen T.R., Trees and logs important to wildlife in the interior Columbia river basin, Portland: USDA Forest Service Pacific NW Region, 1997.
  9. Christensen M., Emborg J., Biodiversity in natural versus managed forest in Denmark. Conservation of biological diversity in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems, For. Ecol. Manage. 85 (1996) 47-51.
  10. Coudroy J.P., Enchaînement biocénotique des insectes xylophages du Sapin (Abies alba L.) en vallée d'Ossau: description des deux premiers groupes d'espèces, Documents d'écologie pyrénéenne III-IV (1984) 97-100.
  11. Crites S., Dale M.R.T., Diversity and abundance of bryophytes, lichens and fungi in relation to woody substrate and successional stage in aspen mixedwood boreal forests, Can. J. Bot. 76 (1997) 641-651.
  12. Dagnelie P., Théorie et méthodes statistiques. Applications agronomiques, Presses agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux, 1975.
  13. Dajoz R., Les insectes xylophages et leur rôle dans la dégradation du bois mort, in: Pesson P. (Ed.), Écologie forestière, Gauthier- Villars, Paris, 1974, pp. 257-287.
  14. Dajoz R., Écologie des insectes forestiers, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1998.
  15. Direction technique de l'Office National des Forêts, Prise en compte de la diversité biologique dans l'aménagement et la gestion forestière, Office National des Forêts, Fontainebleau, 1993.
  16. Dubourdieu J., Manuel d'aménagement forestier, Tec & Doc, Lavoisier, Paris, 1997.
  17. Falinski J.B., Vegetation dynamics in temperate lowland primeval forests, Ecological studies in Bialowieza Forest, Junks, Dordrecht, 1986.
  18. Franklin J.F., Shugart H.H., Harmon M.E., Tree death as an ecological process, BioScience 37 (1987) 550-556.
  19. Ganey J.L., Snag density and composition of snag populations on two National Forests in northern Arizona, For. Ecol. Manage. 117 (1999) 169-178.
  20. Green P., Peterken G.F., Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley UK, in the relation to the intensity of management, For. Ecol. Manage. 98 (1997) 229-238.
  21. Guby N.A.B., Dobbertin M., Quantitative estimates of coarse woody debris and standing dead trees in selected Swiss forests, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 5 (1996) 327-341.
  22. Harmon M.E. et al., Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems, Adv. Ecol. Res. 15 (1986) 133-302.
  23. Jonsson B.G., Availability of coarse woody debris in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest, J. Veg. Sci. 11 (2000) 51-56.
  24. Kirby K.J., Webster S.D., Anctzak A., Effects of forest management on stand structure and quantity of fallen dead wood: some British and Polish examples, For. Ecol. Manage. 43 (1991) 167-174.
  25. Koop H., Hilgen P., Forest dynamics and regeneration mosaic shifts in unexploited beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands at Fontainebleau (France), For. Ecol. Manage. 20 (1987) 135-150.
  26. Lee P., Dynamics of snags in aspen-dominated midboreal forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 105 (1998) 263-272.
  27. Leibundgut H., Europäische Urwälder, Paul Haupt, Berne, 1993.
  28. Lemée G., Structure et dynamique de la hêtraie des réserves biologiques de la forêt de Fontainebleau : un cas de complexe climacique de forêt feuillue monospécifique tempérée, Acta. Oecol. Oecol. Gen. 10 (1989) 155-174.
  29. MathSoft, S-Plus 2000, Guide to Statistics, MathSoft, Inc., Washington, 1999.
  30. Mc Carthy B.C., Bailey R.R., Distribution and abundance of coarse woody debris in a managed forest landscape of the central Appalachians, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 1317-1329.
  31. McComb W., Lindenmayer D., Dying, dead, and down trees, in: Hunter M.L. (Ed.), Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 335-361.
  32. Motta R., Garbarino F., Stand history and its consequences for the present and future dynamic in two silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) stands in the high Pesio Valley (Piedmont, Italy), Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 361-370 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  33. Nagaike T., Hayashi A., Effects of extending rotation period on plant species diversity in Larix kaempferi plantations in central Japan, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 197-202 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  34. Nilsson S.G., Niklasson M., Hedin J., Aronsson G., Gutowski J.M., Linder P., Ljungberg H., Mikusinski G., Ranius T., Densities of large living and dead trees in old-growth temperate and boreal forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 161 (2002) 189-204.
  35. Norden B., Appelqvist T., Conceptual problems of Ecological Continuity and its bioindicators, Biodiv. Conserv. 10 (2001) 779-791.
  36. Oldeman R.A.A., Forest, Elements of sylvology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.
  37. Peterken G.F., Natural woodland, Ecology and conservation in Northen temperate regions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  38. Rameau J.C., Dynamique de la végétation à l'étage montagnard dans les Alpes du sud. Première approche des hêtraie-sapinières. Les applications possibles au niveau de la gestion, Rev. For. Fr. 44 (1992) 393-413.
  39. Samuelsson J., Gustafsson L., Ingelög T., Dying and dead trees : a review of their importance for biodiversity, Swedish Threatened Species Unit, Uppsala, 1994.
  40. Schnitzler A., Borlea F., Lessons from natural forests as keys for sustainable management and improvement of naturalness in managed broadleaved forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 109 (1998) 293-303.
  41. Speight M., Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 1989.
  42. Speight M.R., Wainhouse D., Ecology and management of forest insects, Clarendon press, Oxford, 1989.
  43. Spies T.A., Franklin J.F., Thomas T.D., Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington, Ecology 69 (1988) 1689-1702.
  44. Strurtevant B.R., Bissonette J.A., Long J.N., Roberts D.W., Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand, structure and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland, Ecol. Appl. 7 (1997) 702-712.
  45. Thomas J.W., Wildlife habitats in managed forests in the Blue mountains of Oregon and Washington, Portland, USDA Forest Service Pacific NW Region, 1979.