Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 63, Number 8, December 2006
Page(s) 941 - 950
Published online 09 December 2006
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 941-950
  1. Abrams M.D., Kubiske M.E., Mostoller S.A., Relating wet and dry year in ecophysiology to leaf structure in contrasting temperature tree species, Ecology 75 (1994) 123-133.
  2. Beadle C.L., Ludlow M.M.P., Honeysett J.L., Water relations, in: Hall D.O., Scurlock J.M.O., Bolhar-Nordencampf H.R., Leegood R.C., Long S.P. (Eds.), Photosynthesis and production in a changing environment: A field and laboratory manual, Chapman and Hall, London, 1993, pp. 113-128.
  3. Burdett A.N., Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specification for forest planting stock, Can. J. For. Res. 20 (1990) 415-427.
  4. Clifford S.C., Arndt S.K., Corlett J.E., Joshi S., Sankhla N., Popp M., Jones H.G., The role of solute accumulation, osmotic adjustment and changes in cell wall elasticity in drought tolerance in Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.), J. Exp. Bot. 49 (1998) 967-977 [CrossRef].
  5. Close D.J., Beadle C.L., Brown P.H., The physiological basis of containerized tree seedlings `transplant shock': a review, Aust. For. 68 (2005) 112-120.
  6. Correia M.J., Torres F., Pereira S.J., Water and nutrient supply regimes and the water relations of juvenile leaves of Eucalyptus globulus, Tree Physiol. 5 (1989) 459-471 [PubMed].
  7. Costa e Silva F., Shvaleva A., Maroco J.P., Almeida M.H., Chaves M.M., Pereira J.S., Responses to water stress in two Eucalyptus globulus clones differing in drought tolerance, Tree Physiol. 24 (2004) 1165-1172 [PubMed].
  8. Cregg B.M., Carbon allocation, gas exchange, and needle morphology of Pinus ponderosa genotypes known to differ in growth and survival under imposed drought, Tree Physiol. 14 (1994) 883-898 [PubMed].
  9. Edwards R.R., Dixon M.A., Mechanisms of drought response in Thuja occidentalis L., I. Water stress conditioning and osmotic adjustment, Tree Physiol. 15 (1995) 121-127 [PubMed].
  10. Fan S., Blake T.J., Blumwald E., The relative contribution of elastic and osmotic adjustment to turgor maintenance of woody plants, Physiol. Plant. 90 (1994) 414-419 [CrossRef].
  11. Gibson A., Hubick K.T., Bachelard E.P., Effects of abscisic acid on morphological and physiological responses to water stress in Eucalyptus camaldulensis seedlings, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18 (1991) 153-164.
  12. Grossnickle S.C., Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress, New For. 30 (2005) 273-294.
  13. Grossnickle S.C., Folk R.S., Stock quality assessment: Forecasting survival and performance on a reforestation site, Tree Planter's Note 44 (1993) 113-121.
  14. Grossnickle S.C., Folk R.S., Determining field performance potential with the use of limiting environmental conditions, New For. 13 (1997) 121-138.
  15. Guarnaschelli A.B., Garau A.M., Lemcoff J.H., Tissue water relations in Eucalyptus globulus subsp. maidenii, in: Proceedings IUFRO international symposium Developing eucalypts for the future, Valdivia, Chile, 2001, p. 65.
  16. Guarnaschelli A.B., Lemcoff J.H., Prystupa P., Basci S.O., Responses to drought preconditioning in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. provenances, Trees 17 (2003) 501-509.
  17. Gyenge J.E., Fernández M.E., Dalla Salda G., Schlichter T., Leaf and whole-plant water relations of the Patagonian conifer Austrocedrus chilensis (D. Don) Pic. Ser. et Bizzarri: implications on its drought resistance capacity, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 297-302 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  18. Hinckley T.M., Duhme F., Hinckley A.R., Richter H., Water relations of drought hardy shrubs: osmotic potential and stomatal reactivity, Plant Cell Environ. 3 (1980) 131-140.
  19. Hunt R., Basic growth analysis. Plant growth analysis for beginners, Unwin Hyman Ltd., London, 1990.
  20. Jacobs D.F., Salifu K.F., Seifert J.R., Relative contribution of initial root and shoot morphology in predicting field performance of hardwood seedlings, New For. 30 (2005) 235-251.
  21. Lamhamedi M.S., Bernier P.Y., Hébert C., Effects of shoot size on the gas exchange and growth of containerized Picea mariana seedlings under different watering regimes, New For. 13 (1996) 207-221.
  22. Lamhamedi M.S., Lambany G., Margolis H., Renaud M., Veilleux L., Bernier P.Y., Growth, physiology, root architecture and leaching of air-slit containerized Picea glauca seedlings (1+0) in response to time domain reflectrometry control irrigation regime, Can. J. For. Res. 31 (2001) 1968-1980 [CrossRef].
  23. Landis T.D., Tinus R.W., McDonald S.E., Barnett J.P., The container tree nursery manual, Vol. 4, Seedling nutrition and irrigation, US Dep. Agric., Handb. 674, Washington DC, 1989.
  24. Lemcoff J.H, Guarnaschelli, A.B., Garau A.M., Bascialli M.E., Ghersa C.M., Osmotic adjustment and it use as selection criterion in Eucalyptus seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 2404-2408.
  25. Li C., Some aspects of leaf water relations in four provenances of Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings, For. Ecol. Manage. 111 (1998) 303-308 [CrossRef].
  26. Li C., Berninger F., Koskela J., Sonninen E., Drought responses of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances depend on seasonality of rainfall in their place of origin, Funct. Plant Biol. 27 (2000) 231-238 [CrossRef].
  27. Li C., Wang K., Differences in drought responses of three contrasting Eucalyptus microtheca F. Muell. populations, For. Ecol. Manage. 179 (2003) 377-385 [CrossRef].
  28. Maury P., Berger M., Mojayad F., Planchn C., Leaf water characteristics and drought acclimation in sunflower genotypes, Plant Soil 223 (2000) 153-160 [CrossRef].
  29. Mena-Petite A., Estabillo J.M., Duñabeitia M., González-Moro B., Muñoz-Rueda A., Lacuesta M., Effect of storage conditions on post planting water status and performance of Pinus radiata D. Don stock-types, Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004) 695-704 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  30. Morgan J.M., Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35 (1984) 299-319.
  31. Ngugi M.R., Hunt M.A., Doley D., Ryan P., Dart P., Dry matter production and allocation in Eucalyptus cloeziana and Eucalyptus argophloia in response to soil water deficits, New For. 26 (2003) 187-200.
  32. Nielsen E., Orcutt D., The physiology of plants under stress. Abiotic factors, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996.
  33. Pereira J.S., Pallardy S.G., Water stress limitation to tree productivity, in: Pereira J.S., Landsberg J.J. (Eds.), Biomass Production by Fast Growing Trees, Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989, pp. 37-56.
  34. Pita P., Pardos J.A., Growth, morphology, water use and tissue water relations of Eucalytus globulus clones in response to water deficit, Tree Physiol. 21 (2001) 599-607 [PubMed].
  35. Sands R., Transplanting stress in radiate pine, Aust. For. Res. 14 (1984) 67-72.
  36. SAS Institute, SAS/STAT Guide for personal computer, Version 6, Cary, NC, 1987.
  37. Sasse J., Sands R., Comparative responses of cuttings and seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus to water stress, Tree Physiol. 16 (1996) 287-294 [PubMed].
  38. Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet, E.D., Hemmingsen E.D., Sap pressure in vascular plants, Science 148 (1965) 339-346.
  39. Schulte P., Hinckley T., A comparison of Pressure-Volume curve data analysis techniques, J. Exp. Bot. 36 (1985) 1590-1602.
  40. Stewart J.D., Lieffers V.J., Preconditioning effects of nitrogen addition rate and drought stress on container-grown lodgepole seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 23 (1993) 1663-1671.
  41. Stoneman G.L., Ecology and physiology of establishment of eucalypt seedlings from seed: A review, Aust. For. 57 (1994) 11-30.
  42. Tuomela K., Leaf water relations in six provenances of Eucalyptus microtheca: a greenhouse experiment, For. Ecol. Manage. 92 (1997) 1-10 [CrossRef].
  43. Tuomela K., Koskela J. Gibson A., Relationship between growth, specific leaf area and water use in six populations of Eucalyptus microtheca seedlings from two climates grown in controlled conditions, Aust. For. 64 (2001) 75-79.
  44. Turner N.C., Adaptation to water deficit: a changing perspective, Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13 (1986) 175-190.
  45. Tyree M.T., Hammel H.T., The measurement of turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure bomb technique, J. Exp. Bot. 23 (1972) 267-282.
  46. Tyree M.T., Jarvis P., Water tissue and cells, in: Lange O.L., Nobel P.L., Osmond C.B., Ziegler H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of plant physiology, N.S., Physiological plant ecology II, Vol. 12B, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1982, pp. 37-77.
  47. Tyree M.T., Richter H., Alternate methods of analyzing water potential isotherms: some cautions and clarifications. I. The impact of non-ideality and of some experimental errors, J. Exp. Bot. 32 (1981) 643-653.
  48. Van den Driessche R., Importance of current photosynthates to new root growth in planted conifer seedlings, Can. J. For. Res. 17 (1987) 776-784.
  49. Van den Driessche R., Influence of container nursery regimes on drought resistance of seedlings following planting. I. Survival and growth, Can. J. For. Res. 21 (1991) 555-565.
  50. Van den Driessche R., Influence of container nursery regimes on drought resistance of seedlings following planting. II. Stomatal conductance, specific leaf area and root growth capacity, Can. J. For. Res. 21 (1991) 566-572.
  51. Van den Driessche R., Changes in drought resistance and root growth capacity of container seedlings in response to nursery drought, nitrogen and potassium treatments, Can. J. For. Res. 22 (1992) 740-749.
  52. Vilagrosa A., Cortina J, Gil-Pelegrin E., Bellot J., Suitability of drought-preconditioning techniques in Mediterranean climate, Restor. Ecol. 11 (2003) 208-216 [CrossRef].
  53. Villar-Salvador P., Planelles R., Oliet J., Peñuelas-Rubira J.L., Jacobs D.F., González M., Drought tolerance and transplanting performance of holm oak (Quercus ilex) seedlings after drought hardening in the nursery, Tree Physiol. 24 (2004) 1147-1155 [PubMed].
  54. Wang D., Bachelard E.P., Banks C.G., Growth and water relations of two subspecies of Eucalyptus globulus, Tree Physiol. 4 (1988) 129-138 [PubMed].
  55. Wardlaw I.F., Consideration of apoplastic water in plant organs: a reminder, Funct. Plant Biol. 32 (2005) 561-569 [CrossRef].
  56. White D.A., Beadle C.L., Worledge D., Leaf water relations of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens: seasonal, drought and species effects, Tree Physiol. 16 (1996) 469-476 [PubMed].
  57. White D.A., Turner N.C., Galbraith J.H., Leaf water relations and stomatal behavior of four allopatric Eucalyptus species planted in Mediterranean southwestern Australia, Tree Physiol. 20 (2000) 1157-1165 [PubMed].
  58. Zine El Abidine A., Bernier P.Y., Stewart J.D., Plamondon A.P., Water stress preconditioning of black spruce seedlings from lowland and upland sites, Can. J. Bot. 72 (1994) 1511-1518.
  59. Zwiazek J.J., Blake T.J., Effects of preconditioning on subsequent water relations, stomatal sensitivity, and photosynthesis in osmotically stressed black spruce, Can. J. Bot. 67 (1989) 2240-2244.