EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 67 / No 1 (January-February 2010) Ann. For. Sci., 67 1 (2010) 105 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 1, January-February 2010
Article Number 105
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009086
Published online 24 December 2009
  • Ammer C., Stimm B., Mos and l R., 2008. Ontogenetic variation in the relative influence of light and belowground resources on European beech seedling growth. Tree Physiol. 28: 721–728 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aussenac G., 2000. Interactions between forest stands and microclimate: ecophysiological aspects and consequences for sylviculture. Ann. For. Sci. 57: 287–301 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bal, ier P., Collet C., Miller J.H., Reynolds P.E. and Zedaker S.M., 2006. Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighboring vegetation. Forestry 79: 3–27 [Google Scholar]
  • Beaudet M., Brisson J., Gravel D. and Messier C., 2007. Effect of a major canopy disturbance on the coexistence of Acer saccharum and Fagus grandifolia in the understorey of an old-growth forest. J. Ecol. 95: 458–467 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bohn K.K., Nyl and R.D., 2003. Forecasting development of understory American beech after partial cutting in uneven-aged northern hardwood stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 180: 453–461 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeois L., Messier C. and Brais S., 2004. Mountain maple and balsam fir early response to partial and clear-cut harvesting under aspen stands of northern Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 2049–2059 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brunner A., 1998. A light model for spatially explicit forest stand models. For. Ecol. Manage. 107: 19–46 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Butler Manning B., 2007. Stand structure, gap dynamics and regeneration of a semi-natural mixed beech forest on limestone in central Europe- a case study, Ph.D. thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg im Bresgau, Germany, p. 253. [Google Scholar]
  • Canham C.D., 1988. Growth and canopy architecture of shade-tolerant trees: response to canopy gaps. Ecology 69: 786–795 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Caquet B., 2008. Réactions de semis naturels de hêtre (Fagus sylvatica L.) et d’érable sycomore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) à l’ouverture du couvert : croissance et ajustements fonctionnels, Ph.D. thesis, Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Chesson P., Pacala S.W. and Neuhauser C., 2001. Environmental niches and ecosystem functioning. In: Kinzing A.P., Pacala S. and Tilman G.D. (Eds.), The functional consequences of biodiversity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 213–245. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark J.S., Beckage B., Camill P., Clevel, B., Hille Ris Lambers J., Lichter J., McLachlan J., Mohan J. and Wyckoff P.H., 1999. Interpreting recruitment limitation in forests. Am. J. Bot. 86: 1–16 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Collet C. and Chenost C., 2006. Using competition and light estimates to predict diameter and height growth of naturally regenerated beech seedlings growing under changing canopy conditions. Forestry 79: 489–502 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Collet C., Piboule A., Leroy O. and Frochot H., 2008. Advance Fagus sylvatica and Acer pseudoplatanus seedlings dominate tree regeneration in a mixed broadleaved former coppice-with-standards forest. Forestry 81: 135–150 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dalling J.W., Hubbell S.P. and Silvera K., 1998. Seed dispersal, seedling establishment and gap partitioning among tropical pioneer trees. J. Ecol. 86: 674–689 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Decocq G., Aubert M., Dupont F., Bardat J., Wattez-Franger A., Saguez R., De Foucault B., Alard D. and Delelis-Dusollier A., 2005. Silviculture-driven vegetation change in a European temperate deciduous forest. Ann. For. Sci. 62: 313–323 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Gonzalez M., Deconchat M., Balent G. and Cabanettes A., 2008. Diversity of woody plant seedling banks under closed canopy in fragmented coppice forests. Ann. For. Sci. 65: 511. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Grogan J., L, is R.M., Ashton M.S. and Galvao J., 2005. Growth response by big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) advance seedling regeneration to overhead canopy release in southeast Para, Brazil. For. Ecol. Manage. 204: 399–412 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grubb P.J., 1977. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. 52: 107–145 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hahn K., 2007. From degradation to regeneration! Studies of dead wood, gaps, flora, and regeneration in beech-dominated (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests and the application for nature-based forest management, Ph.D. thesis, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  • Hein S., Collet C., Ammer C., Le Goff N., Skovsgaard J.P. and Savill P.S., 2009. A review of growth and stand dynamics of Acer pseudoplatanus L. in Europe: implications for silviculture. Forestry: 82: 361–385 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly C.K. and Bowler M.G., 2002. Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees. Nature 417: 437–440 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kneeshaw D., Williams H., Nikinmaa E. and Messier C., 2002. Patterns of above- and below-ground response of understory conifer release 6 years after partial cutting. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 255–265 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krasowski M.J. and Wang J.R., 2003. Aboveground growth reponses of understory Abies lasiocarpa saplings to different release cuts. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 1593–1601 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kubota Y., Konno Y. and Hiura T., 1994. Stand structure and growth patterns of understorey trees in a coniferous forest, Taisetsuzan National Park. Northern Japan Ecological Research 9: 333–341 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Madsen P. and Hahn K., 2008. Natural regeneration in a beech-dominated forest managed by close-to-nature principles. A gap cutting based experiment. Can. J. For. Res. 38: 1716–1729 [Google Scholar]
  • Messier C., Doucet R., Ruel J.C., Claveau Y., Kelly C. and Lechowicz M.J., 1999. Functional ecology of advance regeneration in relation to light in boreal forests. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 812–823 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Modry M., Hubeny D. and Rejsek K., 2004. Differential response of naturally regenerated European shade tolerant tree species to soil type and light availability. For. Ecol. Manage. 188: 185–195 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nagel T.A. and Diaci J., 2006. Intermediate wind disturbance in an old-growth beech-fir forest in southeastern Slovenia. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 629–638 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakashizuka T., 2001. Species coexistence in temperate, mixed deciduous forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 205–210 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Örl, er G. and Karlsson C., 2000. Influence of shelterwood density on survival and height increment of Picea abies advance growth. Scand. J. For. Res. 10: 20–29 [Google Scholar]
  • Parish R. and Antos J.A., 2005. Advanced regeneration and seedling establishment in small cutblocks in high-elevation spruce-fir forest at Sicamous Creek, southern British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 1877–1888 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pearson T.R.H., Burslem F.R.P., Goeriz R.E. and Dalling J.W., 2003. Regeneration niche partitioning in neotropical pioneers: effects of gap size, seasonal drought and herbivory on growth and survival. Oecologia 137: 456–465 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peet R.K. and Christensen N.L., 1987. Competition and tree death. Bioscience 7: 586–595 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petritan A.M., von Lüpke B. and Petritan I.C., 2009. Influence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings. Eur. J. For. Res. 128: 61–74 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Piboule A., Collet C., Frochot H. and Dhôte J.F., 2005. Reconstructing crown shape from stem diameter and tree position to supply light models. I. Algorithms and comparison of light simulations. Ann. For. Sci. 62: 645–657 [Google Scholar]
  • Puettmann K.J. and Ammer C., 2007. Trends in North American and European regeneration research under the ecosystem management paradigm. Eur. J. For. Res. 126: 1–9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team, 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • Sil, er J.A. and Pacala S.W., 1985. Neighborhood predictors of plant performance. Oecologia 66: 256–263 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Silvertown J., 2004. Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 605–611 [Google Scholar]
  • Stancioiu P.T. and O’Hara K.L., 2006. Regeneration growth in different light environments of mixed species, multiaged, mountainous forests of Romania. Eur. J. For. Res. 125: 151–162 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Takenaka A., 2006. Dynamics of seedling populations and tree species coexistence in a forest: a simulation study. Ecol. Res. 21: 356–363 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tanaka H., Shibata M., Masaki T., Iida S., Niiyama K., Abe S., Kominami Y. and Nakashizuka T., 2008. Comparative demography of three coexisting Acer species in gaps and under closed canopy. J. Veg. Sci. 19(1): 127–U127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Calster H., Baeten L., Verheyen K., De Keersmaeker L., Dekeyser S., Rogister J.E. and Hermy M., 2008. Diverging effects of overstorey conversion scenarios on the understorey vegetation in a former coppice-with-standards forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 256: 519–528 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Webster C.R. and Lorimer C.G., 2005. Minimum opening sizes for canopy recruitment of midtolerant tree species: a retrospective approach. Ecol. Appl. 15: 1245–1262 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Webster C.R., Nelson K. and Wangen S.R., 2005. Stand dynamics of an insular population of an invasive tree, Acer platanoides. For. Ecol. Manage. 208(1–3): 85–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wright E.F., Canham C.D. and Coates K.D., 2000. Effects of suppression and release on sapling growth for 11 tree species of northern, interior British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1571–1580 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]