EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 67 / No 6 (September 2010) Ann. For. Sci., 67 6 (2010) 612 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 6, September 2010
Article Number 612
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010025
Published online 08 July 2010
  • Aguiar A., Roldão M.I., Esteves I. and Baeta J., 1999. Ensaio de Proveniências de Pinus pinaster Ait. Resultados de quatro anos de ensaio. Silva Lusitana 7: 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Alia R. and Martín S., 2003. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  • Alia R., Gil L. and Pardos J.A., 1995. Performance of 43 Pinus pinaster Ait. Provenances on 5 Locations in Central Spain. Silvae Genet 44: 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  • Alia R., Moro J. and Denis J.B., 1997. Performance of Pinus pinaster provenances in Spain: interpretation of the genotype by environment interaction. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1548–1559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chambel M.R., Climent J., Alía and R., 2007. Divergence among species and populations of Mediterranean pines in biomass allocation of seedlings grown under two watering regimes. Ann. For. Sci. 64: 87–97. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Codesido V. and Fernández-López J., 2008. Juvenile genetic parameters estimates for vigour, stem form, branching habit and survival in three Pinus radiata D. Don progeny tests in Galicia, Spain. Eur. J. For. Sci. 127: 315–325. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa e Silva J. and Potts B.M., 2006. Genotype by environment interaction for growth of Eucalyptus globulus in Australia. Tree Genet. Genomes 2: 61–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crossa J., 1990. Statistical analysis of multilocation trials. Adv. Agron. 44: 55–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Danjon F., 1994. Stand Features and Height Growth in a 36-Year-Old Maritime Pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) Provenance Test. Silvae Genet. 43: 52–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Destremeau D.X., Jolly H. and Thari T., 1976. Contribution à la connaissance des provenances de Pinus pinaster. Ann. Rech. For. Maroc 16: 101–153. [Google Scholar]
  • Eveno E., Collada C., Guevara M.A., Léger V., Soto A., Díaz L., Léger P., González-Martínez S.C., Cervera M.T., Plomion C. and Garnier-Géré P.H., 2008. Contrasting patterns of selection at Pinus pinaster Ait. Drought stress candidate genes as revealed by genetic differentiation analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 417–437. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandes L., Rocheta M., Cordeiro J., Pereira S., Gerber S., Oliveira M.M. and Ribeiro M.M., 2008. Genetic variation, mating patterns and gene flow in a Pinus pinaster Aiton clonal seed orchard. Ann. For. Sci. 65: 706. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Gabriel K.R., 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453–467. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Gezan S.A., Huber D.A. and White T.L., 2006. Post hoc blocking to improve heritability and precision of best linear unbiased genetic predictions. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 2141–2147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • González-Martínez S.C., Alía R. and Gil L., 2002. Population genetic structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.): a comparison of allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Heredity 89: 199–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • González-Martinez S.C., Mariette S., Ribeiro M.M., Burban C., Raffin A., Chambel M.R., Ribeiro C.A.M., Aguiar A., Plomion C., Alia R., Gil L., Vendramin G.G. and Kremer A., 2004. Genetic resources in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton): molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation and differentiation among maternal lineages. For. Ecol. Manage. 197: 103–115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guyon J.P. and Kremer A., 1982. Phenotypic stability of height growth, daily changes in sap pressure and transpiration in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Can. J. For. Res. 12: 936–946. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hopkins E.R. and Butcher T.B., 1993. Provenance comparisons of Pinus pinaster Ait. in Western Australia. CalmScience 1: 55–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Matziris D.I., 1982. Variation in growth and quality characters in Pinus pinaster provenances grown at seven sites in Greece. Silvae Genet. 31: 168–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Nguyen-Queyrens A., Loustau D., Ferhi A. and Guehl J.M., 1998. Within-ring δ13C spatial variability and interannual variations in wood cellulose of two contrasting provenances of Pinus pinaster. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 766–773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Piepho H.P., Mohring J., Melchinger A.E. and Buchse A., 2008. BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing, Euphytica 161, 209–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ribeiro M.M., Plomion C., Petit R., Vendramin G.G. and Szmidt A.E., 2001. Variation of chloroplast simple-sequence repeats in Portuguese maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Theor. App. Genet. 102: 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  • Sierra de Grado R., Moulia B., Fournier M., Alía R. and Díez-Barra R., 1997. Genetic control of stem form in Pinus pinaster Ait. seedlings exposed to lateral light. Trees-Struct Funct 11: 455–461. [Google Scholar]
  • Simsek Y., Tulukcu M. and Toplu F., 1985. Studies on the variation in growth and quality characteristics of Pinus pinaster (Ait.) provenance trials in Turkey. Ormancilik Arastirma Enstitusu Yayinlari, Ankara, Teknik Bülten Serisi No. 149. [Google Scholar]
  • Tognetti R., Michelozzi M., Lauteri M., Brugnoli E. and Giannini R., 2000. Geographic variation in growth, carbon isotope discrimination, and monoterpene composition in Pinus pinaster Ait. provenances. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1682–1690. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yan W. and Tinker N.A., 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 86: 623–645. [Google Scholar]
  • Yan W., 2002. Singular-Value Partitioning in biplot analysis of multienvironment Trial Data. Agron. J. 94: 990–996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yan W., Hunt L.A., Sheng Q. and Szlavnics Z., 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE Biplot. Crop. Sci. 40: 597–605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yan W., Kang M.S., Ma B., Woods S. and Cornelius P.L., 2007. GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data. Crop. Sci. 47: 641–653. [Google Scholar]
  • Zas R., Merlo E. and Fernández-López J., 2004. Genotype x environment interaction in maritime pine families in Galicia, northwest Spain. Silvae Genet. 53: 175–182. [Google Scholar]