EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 67 / No 7 (October-November 2010) Ann. For. Sci., 67 7 (2010) 705 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 7, October-November 2010
Article Number 705
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010030
Published online 19 August 2010
  • Gort J., Zubizarreta Gerendiain A., Peltola H., Pulkkinen P., Routa J., and Jaatinen R., 2009. Differences in fibre properties in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) genetic entries grown at different spacing and sites. Silva Fenn. 43: 355–368. [Google Scholar]
  • Haapanen M., and Pöykkö T., 1993. Genetic relationship between growth and quality traits in an 8-year-old half-sib progeny trial of Pinus sylvestris. Scan. J. For. Res. 8: 305–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haapanen M., Velling P., and Annala M.-J., 1997. Progeny trial estimates of genetic parameters for growth and quality traits in Scots pine. Silva Fenn. 31: 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Hannrup B., Ekberg I., and Persson A., 2000. Genetic correlations among wood, growth capacity and stem traits in Pinus silvestris. Scan. J. For. Res. 15: 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Ikonen V., Kellomäki S., and Peltola H., 2009. Sawn timber properties of Scots pine as affected by initial stand density, thinning and pruning: a simulation based approach. Silva Fenn. 43: 411–431. [Google Scholar]
  • Kang Y.K., Zhang S.Y., and Mansfield S.D., 2004. The effects of initial spacing on wood density, fibre and pulp properties in jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.). Holzforschung 58: 455–463. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kellomäki S. and Tuimala A., 1981. Puuston tiheyden vaikutus puiden oksikkuuteen taimikko- ja riukuvaiheen männiköissä (in Finnish). [Abstract: Effect of stand density on branchiness of young Scots pines]. Folia For. 478 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kellomäki S., and Oker-Blom P., 1983. Canopy structure and light climate in a young Scots pine stand. Silva Fenn. 17: 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Kellomäki S., Ikonen V.-P., Peltola H., and Kolström T., 1999. Modelling the structural growth of Scots pine with implications for wood quality. Ecol. Model. 112: 117–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klein T.W., Defries J.C., and Finkbeiner C.T., 1973. Heritability and genetic correlations: standard error of estimates and sample size. Behav. Genet. 3: 355–364. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kärki L., 1985. Crop tree ideotypes and harvest index should be the basis of selection in cultivated trees. Foundation of Forest Tree Breeding in Finland, Annual report 1984, pp. 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Laasasenaho J., 1982. Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn. 108: 11–108. [Google Scholar]
  • Mäkinen H., 1999a. Growth, suppression, death, and self-pruning of branches of Scots pine in southern and central Finland. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 585–594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mäkinen H., 1999b. Effect of stand density on radial growth of branches of Scots pine in southern and central Finland. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1216–1224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mäkinen, H., and Colin F., 1998. Predicting branch angle and branch diameter of Scots pine from usual tree measurements and stand structural information. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 1686–1696. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mörling T., 2002. Evaluation of annual ring width and ring density development following fertilisation and thinning of Scots pine. Ann. For. Sci. 59: 29–40. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Peltola H., Gort J., Pulkkinen P., Zubizarreta Gerendiain A., Jouni Karppinen J., and Ikonen V.-P., 2009. Differences in growth and wood density traits in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) genetic entries grown at different spacing and sites. Silva Fenn. 43: 339–354. [Google Scholar]
  • Persson B., Persson A., Ståhl E.G., and Karlmats U., 1995. Wood quality of Pinus sylvestris progenies at various spacings. For. Ecol. Manage. 76: 127–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pöykkö T., 1993. Selection criteria in Scots pine breeding with special reference to ideotype. The Foundation for Forest Tree Breeding in Finland, Report 6, 66 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Pöykkö T., and Velling P., 1993. Inheritance of the narrow-crowned Scots pine E 1101, “Kanerva pine”. Silva Fenn. 27: 219–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Ståhl E.G., 1988. Transfer effect and variations in basic density and tracheid length of Pinus sylvestris L. populations. Stud. For. Suec. 180, 15 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ståhl E.G. and Ericson B., 1991. Inheritance of wood properties. In: M. Giertych and C. Mátyás, (Ed.), Genetics of Scots Pine. Developments in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Vol. 3, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 231–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Velling P., 1988. The relationships between yield components in the breeding of Scots pine. Academic Diss., Univ. Helsinki, Helsinki. (in Finnish), 59 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang T., Aitken S., Rozenberg P., and Millie F., 2000. Selection for improved growth and wood density in Lodgepole Pine: effects on radial patterns of wood variation. Wood Fiber Sci. 32: 391–403. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilhelmsson L., Arlinger J., Spångberg K., Lundqvist S.-O., Grahn T., Hedenberg Ö., and Olsson L., 2002. Models for predicting wood properties in stems of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Sweden. Scan. J. For. Res. 17: 330–350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zobel B.J. and Talbert J., 1984. Applied forest tree improvement. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 505 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Zobel B.J. and Van Buijtenen J.P. 1989. Wood variation: Its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 363 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Zubizarreta Gerendiain A., Peltola H., Pulkkinen P., and Kellomäki S., 2009. Effects of genetic entry and competition by neighbouring trees on growth and wood properties of cloned Norway spruce (Picea abies). Ann. For. Sci. 66: 806. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Zubizarreta Gerendiain A., Peltola H., Pulkkinen P., Jaatinen R., Pappinen A., and Kellomäki S., 2007. Differences in growth and wood property traits in cloned Norway spruce (Picea abies). Can. J. For. Res. 37: 2600–2611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]