Open Access

Table II

Redwood epicormic sprout data for pruned and unpruned study areas in 2002 and 2006. Several treatments at Fortuna, Carlotta or Mitsui were not measured for epicormic sprouts because of extensive bear damage. Common lower case letters within study sites denote means that were not significantly different. Standard errors (SE) are given in parentheses following means. Samples sizes are number of trees.

Study area Treatment Mean number of Sample size Mean number of Sample size
prescription* sprouts per tree 2002 2002 sprouts per tree 2006 2006
299 Cutoff Control 27.0 (11.9)a 10 17.4 (9.8)a 10
60% 28.6 (23.6)a 9 18.0 (12.3)a 9
45% 73.7 (33.8)ab 10 27.6 (12.0)a 10
5.5 m or 35% 30.0 (13.5)a 10 11.5 (6.2)a 9
30% 38.5 (9.0)ab 10 11.0 (3.7)a 10
15% 154.3 (37.2)b 17 67.3 (20.6)a 17

M-line Control 6.0 (4.8)a 10 3.6 (2.6)a 10
60% 18.0 (10.2)a 10 3.6 (3.6)a 10
45% 44.0 (18.5)a 10 16.2 (8.3)a 10
30% 76.7 (19.2)a 8 13.7 (5.4)a 7
15% 342.7 (128.4)b 10 169.0 (75.7)b 10

Maple Control 21.0 (6.8)a 12 6.0 (2.3)a 12
Creek 4.9–5.5 m 38.8 (15.6)a 11 12.3 (5.8)a 11

Fortuna Control 6.0 1 0 1
3.0–5.5 m, 40% 4.5 (1.9) 8 7.3 (5.3) 8

Carlotta Control 34.7 (12.5)ab 10
2.4 m
3.0–5.5 m, 40% 24.9 (3.9)a 10 9.4 (3.6)a 10
3.0–5.5 m, 40% 86.1 (24.6)b 10 21.4 (10.0)a 7

M-150 Control 2.7 (2.7)a 9 1.5 (1.5)a 8
Control 2.4 (1.6)a 10 2.0 (1.3)a 6
2.4 m 3.8 (2.3)a 11 2.7 (1.2)a 11
3.0–5.5 m, 40% 74.9 (25.9)b 10 27.1 (20.8)a 10

Mitsui Control 19.2 (9.2)a 10 11.4 (8.4) 10
2.4 m 3.0 (1.6)a 10
3.0–5.5 m, 40% 19.2 (8.0)a 10
*

Unpruned control, targeted pruned height (m), or residual crown length in percent of total height (%).