EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 65 / No 5 (July-August 2008) Ann. For. Sci., 65 5 (2008) 508 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 65, Number 5, July-August 2008
Article Number 508
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008032
Published online 04 July 2008
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 65 (2008) 508
  1. Ashton P.M.S., Lowe J.S., and Larson B.C., 1991. Some evidence for the cause of epicormic sprouting in blue mahoe (Hibiscus elatus SW.) in the moist limestone region of Puerto Rico. J. Trop. For. Sci. 3: 123-130.
  2. Auchmoody L., 1972. Epicormic branching: seasonal change, influence of fertilization and frequency of occurence in uncut stands. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper NE-228: 1-8.
  3. Barthélémy D. and Caraglio Y., 2007. Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann. Bot. 99: 375-407 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  4. Books D.J. and Tubbs C.H., 1970. Relation of light to epicormic sprouting in sugar maple. US For. Ser. Res. Note NC-93, 2 p.
  5. Church T.W. and Godman R.M., 1966. The formation and development of dormant buds in sugar maple. For. Sci. 12: 301-306.
  6. Collett D., 1991. Modelling binary data. Chapman & Hall, London, 369 p.
  7. Courraud R., 1987. Les gourmands sur les chênes rouvre et pédonculé. Forêt-Entreprise 45: 20-33.
  8. Dhôte J.F., 1997. Effets des éclaircies sur le diamètre dominant dans les futaies régulières de hêtres ou de chênse sessiles. Rev. For. Fr. 49: 557-578.
  9. Evans J., 1965. The control of epicormics branches. In: Proceedings of a Seminar held at the University of York, 10-12 April 1985, Advances in Practical Arboriculture, Forestry Commission Bulletin 65: 115-120.
  10. Evans J., 1982. Silviculture of oak and beech in northern France: observations and current trends. Q. J. For. 76: 75-82.
  11. Fabricius L., 1932. Ursachen der Wasserreiserbildung an Eichen. Forstwissenschaft. Centr.bl. 54: 753-766.
  12. Fink S., 1980. Anatomical studies on the occurrence of shoot and root primordia in the stem region of broadleaved and coniferous trees. 1. Proventitious primordia. Allg. Forst- Jagdztg. 151: 160-180.
  13. Fontaine F., 1999. Les bourgeons épicormiques chez le chêne sessile (Quercus petraea) : établissement des bases en vue de l'évaluation dynamique d'un potentiel épicormique, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Volume I, 101 p., Volume II, 94 p.
  14. Fontaine F., Colin F., Jarret P., and Druelle J.-L., 2001. Evolution of the epicormic potential on 17-year-old Quercus petraea trees: first results. Ann. For. Sci. 58: 583-592 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  15. Harmer R., 1990. The Timing of Canopy and Epicormic shoot growth in Quercus robur L. Forestry 63: 279-283 [CrossRef].
  16. Harmer R., 1992. Do dominant oaks have few epicormic branches? Forestry Commission Research Division, Research Information Note 223, 4 p.
  17. Hedlund A., 1964. Epicormic branching in north Louisiana delta. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note S-O-8: 1-3.
  18. Il'Yyushenko, A.F. and Romanovskij, M.G., 2000. Formation of a secondary crown on pedunculate oak and its role on forest stand dynamics et son rôle dans la dynamique des peuplements forestiers, Lesovedenie 3: 65-72.
  19. Jarret P., 2004. Chênaie atlantique : Guide des sylvicultures. ONF ed., Lavoisier, Paris, 335 p.
  20. Joyce P.M., Huss J., McCarthry R., Pfeifer A., and Hendrick E., 1998. Silvicultural guidelines for ash, sycamore, wild cherry, beech and oak in Ireland. COFORD ed., Dublin, 144 p.
  21. Kormanik P.P., Brown C.L., 1969. Origin and development of epicormic branches in sweetgum. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper SE-54: 1-17.
  22. Krahl-Urban J., 1955. Forstgenetik in der Eichen- und Buchenwirtschaft. Forstarchiv 26 6: 121-131.
  23. McCullagh P. and Nelder J.A., 1983. Generalised linear models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman and Hall, London, 532 p.
  24. Meadows J.S., 1995. Epicormic branches and lumber grade of bottomland oak. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual hardwood symposium Conference Advances in Hardwood Utilisation: Following Profitability from the Woods through Rough Dimension, Cashiers, NC, Memphis, TN: National Hardwood Lumber Association. Lowery G., Meyer D. (Eds.) 19-25.
  25. Meadows J.S. and Burkhardt E.C., 2001. Epicormic branches affect lumber grade and value in willow oak. South. J. Appl. For. 25: 136-141.
  26. Nicolini E., Chanson B., and Bonne F., 2001. Stem growth and epicormic branch formation in understorey beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann. Bot. 87: 1-15 [CrossRef].
  27. Nicolini E.Y., Caraglio Y., Pélissier R., Leroy C., and Roggy J.C., 2003. Epicormic branches: a growth indicator for the tropical forest tree Dicorynia guianensis Amshoff (Caesalpiniaceae). Ann. Bot. 92: 97-105 [PubMed] [CrossRef].
  28. Remphrey W. and Davidson C., 1992. Spatiotemporal distribution of epicormic shoots and their architecture in branches of Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 336-340 [CrossRef].
  29. Rey-Lescure E., 1982. Distribution des gourmands sur les fûts de 25 essences en bordures de déboisement. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 687-698 [CrossRef].
  30. SAS, 1999. http://v8doc.sas.com/sashtml/
  31. Schalenberg O. and Pierce F.J., 2002. Contemporary statistical models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 738 p.
  32. Schmerberg C., 1997. Les arbres face à la lumière. In : La lumière et la forêt, Bulletin Technique ONF N° 34, pp. 45-108.
  33. Schmalz J., Frohlich A., and Gebhardt M., 1997. Quality development in young stands of sessile oak (Quercus petraea) in the Spessart district, Hesse: results of a spacing experiment. Forstarchiv 68: 3-10.
  34. Smith H.C., 1966. Epicormic branching on eight species of Appalachian hardwoods, USDA For. Serv. Res. Note NE-53: 1-4.
  35. Spellmann H., 1995. Holzqualität als Beurteilungskriterium im langfristigen Versuchswesen. Forst Holz 23: 743-747.
  36. Spiecker H., 1991. Zur Steuerung des Dickenwachstums und der Astreinigung von Trauben- und Stieleichen (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. und Quercus robur L.). Schriftenreihe der Landesforstverwaltung, Band 72, 150 p.
  37. Stubbs J., 1986. Hardwood epicormic branching. Small knots but large losses. South. J. Appl. For. 10: 214-220.
  38. Ward J., 1992. Response of woody regeneration to thinning mature upland oak stands in Connecticut, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 49: 219-231 [CrossRef].
  39. Wignall T.A. and Browning G., 1988. The effects of stand thinning and artificial shading on epicormic bud emergence in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). Forestry 61: 46-59.
  40. Yokoi S. and Yamaguchi K., 1996. Origin of epicormic branches and effect of thinning on their development in Quercus mongolica var. Grosseserrata. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 78: 169-174.
  41. Zelterman D., 1999. Models for discrete data. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 233 p.