EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 66 / No 3 (April-May 2009) Ann. For. Sci., 66 3 (2009) 302 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 66, Number 3, April-May 2009
Article Number 302
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009007
Published online 07 April 2009
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 66 (2009) 302
  1. Affleck D.L.R., Gregoire T.G., and Valentine H.T., 2005. Edge effects in line intersect sampling with segmented transects. J. Agr. Biol. Env. Stat. 10: 460–477 [CrossRef].
  2. Böhl J., 2007. Deadwood volume assessment in the third Swiss National Forest Inventory: methods and first results. Eur. J. For. Res. 126: 449–457.
  3. Brin A., Meredieu C., Piou D., Brustel H., and Jactel H., 2008. Changes in quantitative patterns of dead wood in maritime pine plantations over time. For. Ecol. Manage. 256: 913–921 [CrossRef].
  4. Brown J.K. and Roussopoulos PJ., 1974. Eliminating biases in the planar intersect method for estimating volumes of small fuels. For. Sci. 20: 350–356.
  5. Bruciamacchie M., 2005. Méthode d'échantillonnage du bois mort, Bois mort à cavités, une clé pour des forêts vivantes, Lavoisier, Paris, pp. 228–235.
  6. Bull E.L., Parks C.G., and Torgersen T.R., 1997. Trees and logs important to wildlife in the Interior Columbia River Basin. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-391. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 55 p.
  7. Caza C.L., 1993. Woody debris in the forests of British Columbia: a review of literature and current research, British Columbia, Ministry of Forests, Research Branch, Victoria, 99 p.
  8. Chessel D. and Thioulouse J., 2003. Analyse de données spatialisées, Fiche de biostatistique, Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Université Lyon1, 30 p.
  9. De Vries P.G., 1986. Sampling theory for forest inventory. A teach-yourself course, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 420 p.
  10. Delisle G.P., Woodard P.M., Titus S.J., and Johnson A.F., 1988. Sample size and variability of fuel weight estimates in natural stands of lodgepole pine. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 649–652 [CrossRef].
  11. Feller M.C., 2003. Coarse woody debris in the old-growth forests of British Columbia, Environ. Rev. 11: 135–157.
  12. Filho A.F., Machado S.A., and Carneiro M.R.A., 2000. Testing accuracy of log volume calculation procedures against water displacement techniques (xylometer). Can. J. For. Res. 30: 990–997 [CrossRef].
  13. Gove J.H., Ringvall A., Stahl G., and Ducey M.J., 1999. Point relascope sampling of downed coarse woody debris. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1718–1726 [CrossRef].
  14. Harmon M.E., Franklin J.K., Swanson F.J., Sollins P., Gregory S.V., Lattin S.D., et al., 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15: 133–302.
  15. Harmon M.E. and Sexton J., 1996. Guidelines for measurements for of woody detritus in forest ecosystems. Publication No. 20, U.S. LTER Network, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Wa. 73 p.
  16. Heilmann-Clausen J. and Christensen M., 2004. Does size matter? On the importance of various dead wood fractions for fungal diversity in Danish beech forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 201: 105–117.
  17. Humphrey J.W., Sippola A.L., Lempérière G., and Dodelin B., 2004. Deadwood as an indicator of biodiversity in European forests: from theory to operational guidance. In: Marchetti M. (Ed.), Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe – from ideas to operationality, EFI Proceedings 51: 193–206.
  18. Jordan G.J., Ducey M.J., and Gove J.H., 2004. Comparing line-intersect, fixed-area, and point relascope sampling for dead and downed coarse woody material in a managed northern hardwood forest. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1766–1775 [CrossRef].
  19. Kaiser L., 1983. Unbiased estimation in line-intersect sampling, Biometrics 39: 965–976.
  20. Kruys N. and Jonsson B.G., 1999. Fine woody debris is important for species richness on logs in managed boreal spruce forests of northern Sweden. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1295–1299 [CrossRef].
  21. Marshall P.L., davis G., and Le May V.M., 2000. Using line intersect sampling for coarse woody debris. For. Res. Tech. Rep. 37 p.
  22. McKenzie N., Ryan P., Fogarty P., and Wood J., 2000. Sampling, Measurement and Analytical Protocols for Carbon Estimation in Soil, Litter and Coarse Woody Debris. National Carbon Accounting System, Technical Report No. 14, Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra, 52 p.
  23. MCPFE, 2003. Background information for improved pan-european indicators for sustainable forest management, MCPFE, Vienna, Austria, 46 p.
  24. IPCC, 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. In: Penman J., Gytarsky M., Hiraishi T., Krug T., Kruger D., Pipatti R., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., Tanabe K., and Wagner F. (Eds.), IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan.
  25. Ringvall A. and Ståhl G., 1999. Field aspects of line intersect sampling for assessing coarse woody debris. For. Ecol. Manage.119: 163–170.
  26. Ståhl G., 1997.Transect relascope sampling for assessing coarse woody debris: the case of a $\pi $/2 relascope angle. Scand. J. For. Res. 12: 375–381.
  27. Stevens V., 1997. The Ecological role of coarse woody debris, an overview of the ecological importance of CWD in BC Forests, Working paper 30, British Columbia, Ministry of Forests Research Program, Canada, 32 p.
  28. Stokland J.N., Tomter S.M., and Söderberg G.U., 2004. Development of dead wood indicators for biodiversity monitoring; experiences from Scandinavia. In: Marchetti M. (Ed.), Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe – from ideas to operationality. EFI Proceedings 51: 207–226.
  29. Van Wagner C.E., 1968. The line intercept method in forest fuel sampling. For. Sci. 14: 20–26.
  30. Wadell K.L., 2002. Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple attributes in extensive resource inventories. Ecol. Indic. 1: 139–153 [CrossRef].
  31. Warren W.G. and Olsen P.F., 1964. A line transect technique for assessing logging waste. For. Sci. 10: 267–276.
  32. Woldendorp G., Keenan R.J., Barry S., and Spencer R.D., 2004. Analysis of sampling methods for coarse woody debris. For. Ecol. Manage. 198: 133–148 [CrossRef].
  33. Woodall C. and Williams M., 2005. Sampling protocol, estimation, and analysis procedures for the down woody materials indicator of the FIA program, Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-256. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, 47 p.